Yiran Hu, W. Hua, Shengwen Yang, M. Gu, Hongxia Niu, L. Ding, Jing Wang, Ran Jing, Xiaohan Fan, Shu Zhang
{"title":"I类适应症患者心脏再同步化治疗植入无反应的预测因素:左室舒张末期尺寸明显扩大和QRS碎片化的存在","authors":"Yiran Hu, W. Hua, Shengwen Yang, M. Gu, Hongxia Niu, L. Ding, Jing Wang, Ran Jing, Xiaohan Fan, Shu Zhang","doi":"10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a highly effective treatment in patients with a class I recommendation. However, a small proportion of the strictly selected patients still fail to respond. This study was designed to identify predictors of non-response in patients with class I indications for CRT and determine the non-response probability of the patients. Methods A total of 296 consecutive patients with a class I recommendation received CRT from January 2009 to January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors for non-response (defined as cardiac death, heart transplantation, or HF hospitalization during 1-year follow-up). Results Among 296 patients, 30 (10.1%) met non-response. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that non-response to CRT was associated with a fragmented QRS (odd ratio (OR) = 2.86, 95% CI: 1.14–7.12; P = 0.025) and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) ≥ 77 mm (OR = 3.02, 95% CI: 1.17–7.82; P = 0.022). Patients with both of the predictors had a non-response probability of 46.2% (95% CI: 19.1%–73.3%). Conclusion In patients with left bundle branch block and wider QRS duration, the proportion of non-response to CRT is not low in real world. The presence of the dilated LVEDD or fragmented QRS is a strong predictor of non-response to CRT. The probability of non-response in the patients with the two predictors was 46.2%.","PeriodicalId":285674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation in patients with class I indications: the markedly dilated left ventricular end-diastolic dimension and the presence of fragmented QRS\",\"authors\":\"Yiran Hu, W. Hua, Shengwen Yang, M. Gu, Hongxia Niu, L. Ding, Jing Wang, Ran Jing, Xiaohan Fan, Shu Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.07.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a highly effective treatment in patients with a class I recommendation. However, a small proportion of the strictly selected patients still fail to respond. This study was designed to identify predictors of non-response in patients with class I indications for CRT and determine the non-response probability of the patients. Methods A total of 296 consecutive patients with a class I recommendation received CRT from January 2009 to January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors for non-response (defined as cardiac death, heart transplantation, or HF hospitalization during 1-year follow-up). Results Among 296 patients, 30 (10.1%) met non-response. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that non-response to CRT was associated with a fragmented QRS (odd ratio (OR) = 2.86, 95% CI: 1.14–7.12; P = 0.025) and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) ≥ 77 mm (OR = 3.02, 95% CI: 1.17–7.82; P = 0.022). Patients with both of the predictors had a non-response probability of 46.2% (95% CI: 19.1%–73.3%). Conclusion In patients with left bundle branch block and wider QRS duration, the proportion of non-response to CRT is not low in real world. The presence of the dilated LVEDD or fragmented QRS is a strong predictor of non-response to CRT. The probability of non-response in the patients with the two predictors was 46.2%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.07.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.07.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predictors of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation in patients with class I indications: the markedly dilated left ventricular end-diastolic dimension and the presence of fragmented QRS
Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a highly effective treatment in patients with a class I recommendation. However, a small proportion of the strictly selected patients still fail to respond. This study was designed to identify predictors of non-response in patients with class I indications for CRT and determine the non-response probability of the patients. Methods A total of 296 consecutive patients with a class I recommendation received CRT from January 2009 to January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors for non-response (defined as cardiac death, heart transplantation, or HF hospitalization during 1-year follow-up). Results Among 296 patients, 30 (10.1%) met non-response. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that non-response to CRT was associated with a fragmented QRS (odd ratio (OR) = 2.86, 95% CI: 1.14–7.12; P = 0.025) and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) ≥ 77 mm (OR = 3.02, 95% CI: 1.17–7.82; P = 0.022). Patients with both of the predictors had a non-response probability of 46.2% (95% CI: 19.1%–73.3%). Conclusion In patients with left bundle branch block and wider QRS duration, the proportion of non-response to CRT is not low in real world. The presence of the dilated LVEDD or fragmented QRS is a strong predictor of non-response to CRT. The probability of non-response in the patients with the two predictors was 46.2%.