以岩石为花岗岩:国际比赛用冰壶石的地质、矿物学和质地综合研究

Derek. D. V. Leung, A. McDonald
{"title":"以岩石为花岗岩:国际比赛用冰壶石的地质、矿物学和质地综合研究","authors":"Derek. D. V. Leung, A. McDonald","doi":"10.3749/canmin.2100052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The duopoly of curling stone sources suitable for international competition (Ailsa Craig, Firth of Clyde, Scotland and Trefor, Llŷn Peninsula, North Wales) has led to a long-held paradigm that the rocks from these localities are geologically unique. To evaluate this paradigm, we provide the first comprehensive, detailed analyses of the geological, mineralogical, and textural properties of curling stones, with a focus on three main areas: (1) the collective features of all curling stone lithologies, (2) the differences among the lithologies used for running bands versus striking bands, and (3) the presence of quartz, whose brittleness was previously considered to be undesirable in curling stones. The four curling stone varieties from the two localities (Ailsa Craig Blue Hone, Ailsa Craig Common Green, Blue Trefor, and Red Trefor) were analyzed using petrography, scanning electron microscopy, digital image analysis, powder X-ray diffraction, and normative mineralogy, with the following results: The curling stone varieties that are suitable for international competition can be broadly characterized as fine- to medium-grained, sparsely porphyritic to glomeroporphyritic, weakly to moderately altered, massive to weakly foliated, Phanerozoic granitoids (sensu lato). All four varieties are composed of feldspar (65–80 mod.%, with albite being the dominant component) and quartz (15–25 mod.%), along with mafic and accessory minerals (5–20 mod.%). The Ailsa Craig suite is classified as alkali feldspar quartz syenite, whereas the Trefor suite ranges from quartz monzogabbro (Blue Trefor) to granodiorite-granite (Red Trefor). None are strictly classified as granite.Predominantly equigranular textures are preferred for running bands (Ailsa Craig Blue Hone), whereas seriate to glomeroporphyritic textures are preferred for striking bands (Ailsa Craig Common Green, Blue Trefor, and Red Trefor). These are consistent with observations of used curling stones: pitting adversely affects larger grains in the running band, whereas a wider grain-size distribution correlates with fewer crescent-shaped fractures in the striking band.The appreciable abundance of unstrained, interstitial quartz (15–25 mod.%) in all curling stone samples challenges the longstanding belief of its absence and undesirability in curling stones. The degree of strain in quartz is likely to be a key criterion for selecting prospective curling stone materials.\n In conclusion, none of the examined characteristics of curling stones are unique in comparison to granitoids worldwide.","PeriodicalId":134244,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian Mineralogist","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taking Rocks for Granite: An Integrated Geological, Mineralogical, and Textural Study of Curling Stones Used in International Competition\",\"authors\":\"Derek. D. V. Leung, A. McDonald\",\"doi\":\"10.3749/canmin.2100052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The duopoly of curling stone sources suitable for international competition (Ailsa Craig, Firth of Clyde, Scotland and Trefor, Llŷn Peninsula, North Wales) has led to a long-held paradigm that the rocks from these localities are geologically unique. To evaluate this paradigm, we provide the first comprehensive, detailed analyses of the geological, mineralogical, and textural properties of curling stones, with a focus on three main areas: (1) the collective features of all curling stone lithologies, (2) the differences among the lithologies used for running bands versus striking bands, and (3) the presence of quartz, whose brittleness was previously considered to be undesirable in curling stones. The four curling stone varieties from the two localities (Ailsa Craig Blue Hone, Ailsa Craig Common Green, Blue Trefor, and Red Trefor) were analyzed using petrography, scanning electron microscopy, digital image analysis, powder X-ray diffraction, and normative mineralogy, with the following results: The curling stone varieties that are suitable for international competition can be broadly characterized as fine- to medium-grained, sparsely porphyritic to glomeroporphyritic, weakly to moderately altered, massive to weakly foliated, Phanerozoic granitoids (sensu lato). All four varieties are composed of feldspar (65–80 mod.%, with albite being the dominant component) and quartz (15–25 mod.%), along with mafic and accessory minerals (5–20 mod.%). The Ailsa Craig suite is classified as alkali feldspar quartz syenite, whereas the Trefor suite ranges from quartz monzogabbro (Blue Trefor) to granodiorite-granite (Red Trefor). None are strictly classified as granite.Predominantly equigranular textures are preferred for running bands (Ailsa Craig Blue Hone), whereas seriate to glomeroporphyritic textures are preferred for striking bands (Ailsa Craig Common Green, Blue Trefor, and Red Trefor). These are consistent with observations of used curling stones: pitting adversely affects larger grains in the running band, whereas a wider grain-size distribution correlates with fewer crescent-shaped fractures in the striking band.The appreciable abundance of unstrained, interstitial quartz (15–25 mod.%) in all curling stone samples challenges the longstanding belief of its absence and undesirability in curling stones. The degree of strain in quartz is likely to be a key criterion for selecting prospective curling stone materials.\\n In conclusion, none of the examined characteristics of curling stones are unique in comparison to granitoids worldwide.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Canadian Mineralogist\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Canadian Mineralogist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3749/canmin.2100052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian Mineralogist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3749/canmin.2100052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

适合国际比赛的冰壶石资源的双寡头垄断(苏格兰克莱德湾的艾尔萨克雷格和北威尔士Llŷn半岛的特雷弗)导致了一个长期存在的模式,即来自这些地方的岩石在地质上是独一无二的。为了评估这一模式,我们对冰壶石的地质、矿物学和质地特性进行了首次全面、详细的分析,重点关注三个主要领域:(1)所有冰壶石岩性的共同特征,(2)用于跑带和冲击带的岩性之间的差异,以及(3)石英的存在,石英的脆性以前被认为是冰壶石中不希望出现的。采用岩石学、扫描电镜、数字图像分析、粉末x射线衍射和规范矿物学等方法,对两个地区的4个冰壶石品种(Ailsa Craig Blue Hone、Ailsa Craig Common Green、Blue Trefor和Red Trefor)进行了分析,结果如下:适合参加国际竞争的冰壶石品种大致可分为细粒到中粒、稀斑状到肾小球斑状、弱蚀变到中等蚀变、块状到弱叶理、显生宙花岗岩类(sensu lato)。这四个品种均由长石(65-80莫德%,钠长石为主要成分)和石英(15-25莫德%)以及镁铁质和辅助矿物(5-20莫德%)组成。alsa Craig套属碱长石石英正长岩,而Trefor套属石英二长辉长岩(蓝长辉长岩)至花岗闪长花岗岩(红长辉长岩)。没有一个被严格归类为花岗岩。主要是等边纹理优先用于跑步带(艾尔萨·克雷格蓝带),而连续到肾小球状纹理优先用于击打带(艾尔萨·克雷格普通绿带、蓝带和红带)。这与对使用过的冰壶石的观察结果一致:在运行带中,点蚀对较大的颗粒产生不利影响,而在冲击带中,较宽的颗粒尺寸分布与较少的新月形裂缝相关。在所有的冰壶石样品中,未拉伸的间隙石英(15 - 25%)的可观丰度挑战了长期以来认为其在冰壶石中不存在和不受欢迎的观点。石英的应变程度可能是选择有前途的冰壶石材料的关键标准。总之,与世界范围内的花岗岩相比,没有任何一种冰壶石的特征是独一无二的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Taking Rocks for Granite: An Integrated Geological, Mineralogical, and Textural Study of Curling Stones Used in International Competition
The duopoly of curling stone sources suitable for international competition (Ailsa Craig, Firth of Clyde, Scotland and Trefor, Llŷn Peninsula, North Wales) has led to a long-held paradigm that the rocks from these localities are geologically unique. To evaluate this paradigm, we provide the first comprehensive, detailed analyses of the geological, mineralogical, and textural properties of curling stones, with a focus on three main areas: (1) the collective features of all curling stone lithologies, (2) the differences among the lithologies used for running bands versus striking bands, and (3) the presence of quartz, whose brittleness was previously considered to be undesirable in curling stones. The four curling stone varieties from the two localities (Ailsa Craig Blue Hone, Ailsa Craig Common Green, Blue Trefor, and Red Trefor) were analyzed using petrography, scanning electron microscopy, digital image analysis, powder X-ray diffraction, and normative mineralogy, with the following results: The curling stone varieties that are suitable for international competition can be broadly characterized as fine- to medium-grained, sparsely porphyritic to glomeroporphyritic, weakly to moderately altered, massive to weakly foliated, Phanerozoic granitoids (sensu lato). All four varieties are composed of feldspar (65–80 mod.%, with albite being the dominant component) and quartz (15–25 mod.%), along with mafic and accessory minerals (5–20 mod.%). The Ailsa Craig suite is classified as alkali feldspar quartz syenite, whereas the Trefor suite ranges from quartz monzogabbro (Blue Trefor) to granodiorite-granite (Red Trefor). None are strictly classified as granite.Predominantly equigranular textures are preferred for running bands (Ailsa Craig Blue Hone), whereas seriate to glomeroporphyritic textures are preferred for striking bands (Ailsa Craig Common Green, Blue Trefor, and Red Trefor). These are consistent with observations of used curling stones: pitting adversely affects larger grains in the running band, whereas a wider grain-size distribution correlates with fewer crescent-shaped fractures in the striking band.The appreciable abundance of unstrained, interstitial quartz (15–25 mod.%) in all curling stone samples challenges the longstanding belief of its absence and undesirability in curling stones. The degree of strain in quartz is likely to be a key criterion for selecting prospective curling stone materials. In conclusion, none of the examined characteristics of curling stones are unique in comparison to granitoids worldwide.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信