{"title":"开放式肌后下补片修补术与腹腔镜腹膜内补片修补术治疗腹疝的随机对照试验","authors":"Awadhesh Pratap Singh Parihar","doi":"10.46889/jsrp.2023.4109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The precise treatment of ventral hernias is still a topic of considerable debate. The aim of this study was to compare the methods of open retromuscular sublay versus laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for ventral hernias.\n\nMethods: Following approval by the Institutional Ethics Committee, Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital, Bareilly, 88 patients were randomly divided into two groups in 1:1 allocation ratio, each compromising 44 patients. Patients characteristics, hernia size and postoperative complications were recorded.\n\nResults: Mean operative time was significantly (p= <0.001) lower in the SUBLAY group (55.66±8.34 minutes) than in the IPOM group (68.75±10.44 minutes). The post-operative pain(VAS) was significantly (p=0.001) lower amongst patients of the IPOM group (2.36±0.61) as compared to the sublay (4.52±0.66) group. The hospital stay was significantly (p=0.001) lower among patients of the IPOM group (3.61±2.28 days) than the sublay group (6.50±1.68 days).\n\nConclusion: Laparoscopic repair in medium- and large-sized defects is a feasible and safe approach. IPOM compared to SUBLAY significantly reduces postoperative complications and hospital stay.","PeriodicalId":101514,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgery Research and Practice","volume":"245 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open Retromuscular Sublay Mesh Repair Versus Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Repair for Ventral Hernias-A Randomized Control Trial\",\"authors\":\"Awadhesh Pratap Singh Parihar\",\"doi\":\"10.46889/jsrp.2023.4109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The precise treatment of ventral hernias is still a topic of considerable debate. The aim of this study was to compare the methods of open retromuscular sublay versus laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for ventral hernias.\\n\\nMethods: Following approval by the Institutional Ethics Committee, Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital, Bareilly, 88 patients were randomly divided into two groups in 1:1 allocation ratio, each compromising 44 patients. Patients characteristics, hernia size and postoperative complications were recorded.\\n\\nResults: Mean operative time was significantly (p= <0.001) lower in the SUBLAY group (55.66±8.34 minutes) than in the IPOM group (68.75±10.44 minutes). The post-operative pain(VAS) was significantly (p=0.001) lower amongst patients of the IPOM group (2.36±0.61) as compared to the sublay (4.52±0.66) group. The hospital stay was significantly (p=0.001) lower among patients of the IPOM group (3.61±2.28 days) than the sublay group (6.50±1.68 days).\\n\\nConclusion: Laparoscopic repair in medium- and large-sized defects is a feasible and safe approach. IPOM compared to SUBLAY significantly reduces postoperative complications and hospital stay.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgery Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"245 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgery Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46889/jsrp.2023.4109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgery Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46889/jsrp.2023.4109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Open Retromuscular Sublay Mesh Repair Versus Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Repair for Ventral Hernias-A Randomized Control Trial
Background: The precise treatment of ventral hernias is still a topic of considerable debate. The aim of this study was to compare the methods of open retromuscular sublay versus laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for ventral hernias.
Methods: Following approval by the Institutional Ethics Committee, Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital, Bareilly, 88 patients were randomly divided into two groups in 1:1 allocation ratio, each compromising 44 patients. Patients characteristics, hernia size and postoperative complications were recorded.
Results: Mean operative time was significantly (p= <0.001) lower in the SUBLAY group (55.66±8.34 minutes) than in the IPOM group (68.75±10.44 minutes). The post-operative pain(VAS) was significantly (p=0.001) lower amongst patients of the IPOM group (2.36±0.61) as compared to the sublay (4.52±0.66) group. The hospital stay was significantly (p=0.001) lower among patients of the IPOM group (3.61±2.28 days) than the sublay group (6.50±1.68 days).
Conclusion: Laparoscopic repair in medium- and large-sized defects is a feasible and safe approach. IPOM compared to SUBLAY significantly reduces postoperative complications and hospital stay.