宪法权利和自由实现机制中的算法:数字时代的挑战

I. Pibaev, S. Simonova
{"title":"宪法权利和自由实现机制中的算法:数字时代的挑战","authors":"I. Pibaev, S. Simonova","doi":"10.21128/1812-7126-2020-6-31-50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development and wide dissemination of new technological solutions lead to mainstreaming of algorithmic decision-making processes. Digital technologies become highly-demanded in state activity as well as social life and this gives the springboard for scientific discussion about the shift in the scope of constitutional rights and freedoms connected with extending and new limitation. Private data processing, content management, unfettered control over information and search results provide IT companies with huge powers concerning fundamental human rights. The article deals with some legal and ethic issues relating to the algorithms and artificial intelligence systems impact on the enforcement and the defense of constitutional rights. Taking into account the algorithmic nature and legal aspects as well as foreign practices the authors note the risks for civil, political and socio-economic rights. Special attention is given to the conceptualization of the ways the algorithms influence on legal status and human rights, justification of the suitable ways of reducing the risks connected with total algorithmization. The paper contains the study of the significance and extensive prospects of the ensuring the right to explanation in the context of the sense and reasons of automated decisions in order to enhance their transparency and accountability. The authors note that in spite of the lack of legal rules regulating algorithmic communication some state make their own steps on the way toward harmonization of algorithms with human rights and legal procedures. It is emphasized that state rejection in human translation of algorithmic processes may lead to further privatization of public powers in human rights protection. At the end of the paper the possible solutions of the discussed problems are suggested through the lens of ethic principles worked out in partnership with religious clerics. The mutual ethic declaration was signed by IBM, Microsoft and Roman Catholic Church and this fact strengthens confidence in the future of artificial intelligence as an instrument not only for narrow groups but for all of mankind.","PeriodicalId":113514,"journal":{"name":"Sravnitel noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie","volume":"209 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Algorithms in the mechanism of implementation of constitutional rights and freedoms: challenges in the digital age\",\"authors\":\"I. Pibaev, S. Simonova\",\"doi\":\"10.21128/1812-7126-2020-6-31-50\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The development and wide dissemination of new technological solutions lead to mainstreaming of algorithmic decision-making processes. Digital technologies become highly-demanded in state activity as well as social life and this gives the springboard for scientific discussion about the shift in the scope of constitutional rights and freedoms connected with extending and new limitation. Private data processing, content management, unfettered control over information and search results provide IT companies with huge powers concerning fundamental human rights. The article deals with some legal and ethic issues relating to the algorithms and artificial intelligence systems impact on the enforcement and the defense of constitutional rights. Taking into account the algorithmic nature and legal aspects as well as foreign practices the authors note the risks for civil, political and socio-economic rights. Special attention is given to the conceptualization of the ways the algorithms influence on legal status and human rights, justification of the suitable ways of reducing the risks connected with total algorithmization. The paper contains the study of the significance and extensive prospects of the ensuring the right to explanation in the context of the sense and reasons of automated decisions in order to enhance their transparency and accountability. The authors note that in spite of the lack of legal rules regulating algorithmic communication some state make their own steps on the way toward harmonization of algorithms with human rights and legal procedures. It is emphasized that state rejection in human translation of algorithmic processes may lead to further privatization of public powers in human rights protection. At the end of the paper the possible solutions of the discussed problems are suggested through the lens of ethic principles worked out in partnership with religious clerics. The mutual ethic declaration was signed by IBM, Microsoft and Roman Catholic Church and this fact strengthens confidence in the future of artificial intelligence as an instrument not only for narrow groups but for all of mankind.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sravnitel noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie\",\"volume\":\"209 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sravnitel noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21128/1812-7126-2020-6-31-50\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sravnitel noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21128/1812-7126-2020-6-31-50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

新技术解决方案的发展和广泛传播导致算法决策过程的主流化。数字技术在国家活动和社会生活中都有很高的需求,这为科学讨论宪法权利和自由范围的变化提供了跳板,这些权利和自由与扩展和新的限制有关。私人数据处理、内容管理、对信息和搜索结果的不受约束的控制,使IT公司在基本人权方面拥有巨大的权力。本文论述了算法和人工智能系统对宪法权利的执行和维护的影响所涉及的一些法律和伦理问题。考虑到算法性质和法律方面以及国外实践,作者注意到公民、政治和社会经济权利的风险。特别注意将算法对法律地位和人权的影响方式概念化,说明减少与全部算法化有关的风险的适当方法。本文研究了在自动决策的意义和原因的背景下确保解释权的意义和广泛前景,以提高其透明度和问责制。作者指出,尽管缺乏规范算法通信的法律规则,但一些国家在实现算法与人权和法律程序协调的道路上采取了自己的步骤。强调在人工翻译算法过程中的国家拒绝可能导致人权保护中的公共权力进一步私有化。在文章的最后,通过与宗教神职人员合作制定的伦理原则,提出了解决所讨论问题的可能方法。共同伦理宣言由IBM、微软和罗马天主教会签署,这一事实增强了人们对人工智能未来的信心,人工智能不仅是少数群体的工具,也是全人类的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Algorithms in the mechanism of implementation of constitutional rights and freedoms: challenges in the digital age
The development and wide dissemination of new technological solutions lead to mainstreaming of algorithmic decision-making processes. Digital technologies become highly-demanded in state activity as well as social life and this gives the springboard for scientific discussion about the shift in the scope of constitutional rights and freedoms connected with extending and new limitation. Private data processing, content management, unfettered control over information and search results provide IT companies with huge powers concerning fundamental human rights. The article deals with some legal and ethic issues relating to the algorithms and artificial intelligence systems impact on the enforcement and the defense of constitutional rights. Taking into account the algorithmic nature and legal aspects as well as foreign practices the authors note the risks for civil, political and socio-economic rights. Special attention is given to the conceptualization of the ways the algorithms influence on legal status and human rights, justification of the suitable ways of reducing the risks connected with total algorithmization. The paper contains the study of the significance and extensive prospects of the ensuring the right to explanation in the context of the sense and reasons of automated decisions in order to enhance their transparency and accountability. The authors note that in spite of the lack of legal rules regulating algorithmic communication some state make their own steps on the way toward harmonization of algorithms with human rights and legal procedures. It is emphasized that state rejection in human translation of algorithmic processes may lead to further privatization of public powers in human rights protection. At the end of the paper the possible solutions of the discussed problems are suggested through the lens of ethic principles worked out in partnership with religious clerics. The mutual ethic declaration was signed by IBM, Microsoft and Roman Catholic Church and this fact strengthens confidence in the future of artificial intelligence as an instrument not only for narrow groups but for all of mankind.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信