我们如何谈论人工智能(以及为什么它很重要)

Ryan Calo
{"title":"我们如何谈论人工智能(以及为什么它很重要)","authors":"Ryan Calo","doi":"10.1145/3306618.3314225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How we talk about artificial intelligence matters. Not only do our rhetorical choices influence public expectations of AI, they implicitly make the case for or against specific government interventions. Conceiving of AI as a global project to which each nation can contribute, for instance, suggests a different course of action than understanding AI as a \"race\" America cannot afford to lose. And just as inflammatory terms such as \"killer robot\" aim to catalyze limitations of autonomous weapons, so do the popular terms \"ethics\" and \"governance\" subtly argue for a lesser role for government in setting AI policy. How should we talk about AI? And what's at stake with our rhetorical choices? This presentation explores the interplay between claims about AI and law's capacity to channel AI in the public interest.","PeriodicalId":418125,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How We Talk About AI (and Why It Matters)\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Calo\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3306618.3314225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How we talk about artificial intelligence matters. Not only do our rhetorical choices influence public expectations of AI, they implicitly make the case for or against specific government interventions. Conceiving of AI as a global project to which each nation can contribute, for instance, suggests a different course of action than understanding AI as a \\\"race\\\" America cannot afford to lose. And just as inflammatory terms such as \\\"killer robot\\\" aim to catalyze limitations of autonomous weapons, so do the popular terms \\\"ethics\\\" and \\\"governance\\\" subtly argue for a lesser role for government in setting AI policy. How should we talk about AI? And what's at stake with our rhetorical choices? This presentation explores the interplay between claims about AI and law's capacity to channel AI in the public interest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":418125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

我们如何谈论人工智能很重要。我们的修辞选择不仅会影响公众对人工智能的期望,还会暗含支持或反对特定政府干预的理由。例如,将人工智能视为一个全球项目,每个国家都可以为之做出贡献,这与将人工智能理解为美国输不起的“种族”不同。正如“杀手机器人”(killer robot)等煽动性词汇旨在促进对自主武器的限制一样,“伦理”(ethics)和“治理”(governance)等流行词汇也在巧妙地主张政府在制定人工智能政策方面发挥较小的作用。我们应该如何谈论人工智能?我们的修辞选择有什么利害关系?本演讲探讨了关于人工智能的主张与法律为公共利益引导人工智能的能力之间的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How We Talk About AI (and Why It Matters)
How we talk about artificial intelligence matters. Not only do our rhetorical choices influence public expectations of AI, they implicitly make the case for or against specific government interventions. Conceiving of AI as a global project to which each nation can contribute, for instance, suggests a different course of action than understanding AI as a "race" America cannot afford to lose. And just as inflammatory terms such as "killer robot" aim to catalyze limitations of autonomous weapons, so do the popular terms "ethics" and "governance" subtly argue for a lesser role for government in setting AI policy. How should we talk about AI? And what's at stake with our rhetorical choices? This presentation explores the interplay between claims about AI and law's capacity to channel AI in the public interest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信