在L2中利用非目标生产

Arnaldo Robles-Reyes
{"title":"在L2中利用非目标生产","authors":"Arnaldo Robles-Reyes","doi":"10.17265/2161-623X/2017.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent, second language acquisition (SLA) research has suggested language learners’ errors can be the opportunities for teachers to facilitate learners’ second language (L2) development and performance through the use of elicitation strategies. They are known as an explicit manner of motivating learners to correct their original erroneous utterance without the expert providing the learner with the correct form or any explanations of errors. Furthermore, when prompts (e.g., repetition of learners’ error) are added to the elicitations, the combination is prone to encourage learners to produce their own target-like output by serving to assist learners in the transition of declarative knowledge to procedural knowledge. Unfortunately, despite the existing structures of research available, there is still a great area of concern inside and outside the classroom with professionals unbearably providing ill-advised protocols that include, most often than not, giving away the correct answer before the learner has been given an opportunity to reformulate their utterance. Likewise, this current empirical study made up of 34 intermediate level Spanish students in a middle size university, elicitations with prompts were suggested to be more effective in promoting the production of modified output (MO) when compared to no feedback and elicitations alone (without prompts). The full and partial repairs formed by the learners were indicative of a more target-like production in regards to the higher rate of reformulations, regardless of the tense and aspect in the target structures.","PeriodicalId":159185,"journal":{"name":"US-China education review","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taking Advantage of Non-Target-Like Production in the L2\",\"authors\":\"Arnaldo Robles-Reyes\",\"doi\":\"10.17265/2161-623X/2017.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent, second language acquisition (SLA) research has suggested language learners’ errors can be the opportunities for teachers to facilitate learners’ second language (L2) development and performance through the use of elicitation strategies. They are known as an explicit manner of motivating learners to correct their original erroneous utterance without the expert providing the learner with the correct form or any explanations of errors. Furthermore, when prompts (e.g., repetition of learners’ error) are added to the elicitations, the combination is prone to encourage learners to produce their own target-like output by serving to assist learners in the transition of declarative knowledge to procedural knowledge. Unfortunately, despite the existing structures of research available, there is still a great area of concern inside and outside the classroom with professionals unbearably providing ill-advised protocols that include, most often than not, giving away the correct answer before the learner has been given an opportunity to reformulate their utterance. Likewise, this current empirical study made up of 34 intermediate level Spanish students in a middle size university, elicitations with prompts were suggested to be more effective in promoting the production of modified output (MO) when compared to no feedback and elicitations alone (without prompts). The full and partial repairs formed by the learners were indicative of a more target-like production in regards to the higher rate of reformulations, regardless of the tense and aspect in the target structures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":159185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"US-China education review\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"US-China education review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623X/2017.10.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"US-China education review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623X/2017.10.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,第二语言习得(SLA)研究表明,语言学习者的错误可以成为教师通过使用启发策略促进学习者第二语言发展和表现的机会。他们被认为是一种明确的方式来激励学习者纠正他们原来的错误话语,而不需要专家向学习者提供正确的形式或任何错误的解释。此外,当提示(例如,重复学习者的错误)添加到引出时,这种组合容易通过帮助学习者从陈述性知识过渡到程序性知识来鼓励学习者产生自己的目标输出。不幸的是,尽管现有的研究结构是可用的,但在课堂内外仍然存在很大的关注领域,专业人士提供了令人难以忍受的不明智的协议,其中包括,通常情况下,在学习者有机会重新表述他们的话语之前就给出了正确的答案。同样,这项由一所中等规模大学的34名中级西班牙语学生组成的实证研究表明,与没有反馈和单独的引出(没有提示)相比,带有提示的引出在促进修改输出(MO)的产生方面更有效。学习者形成的全部和部分修复表明,无论目标结构的时态和方面如何,在更高的重新表述率方面,学习者产生了更像目标的产物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Taking Advantage of Non-Target-Like Production in the L2
Recent, second language acquisition (SLA) research has suggested language learners’ errors can be the opportunities for teachers to facilitate learners’ second language (L2) development and performance through the use of elicitation strategies. They are known as an explicit manner of motivating learners to correct their original erroneous utterance without the expert providing the learner with the correct form or any explanations of errors. Furthermore, when prompts (e.g., repetition of learners’ error) are added to the elicitations, the combination is prone to encourage learners to produce their own target-like output by serving to assist learners in the transition of declarative knowledge to procedural knowledge. Unfortunately, despite the existing structures of research available, there is still a great area of concern inside and outside the classroom with professionals unbearably providing ill-advised protocols that include, most often than not, giving away the correct answer before the learner has been given an opportunity to reformulate their utterance. Likewise, this current empirical study made up of 34 intermediate level Spanish students in a middle size university, elicitations with prompts were suggested to be more effective in promoting the production of modified output (MO) when compared to no feedback and elicitations alone (without prompts). The full and partial repairs formed by the learners were indicative of a more target-like production in regards to the higher rate of reformulations, regardless of the tense and aspect in the target structures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信