书评:从圣经中的男人和女人中恢复过来:教会如何需要重新发现她的目的,作者:艾米·伯德

Gracilynn J. Hanson
{"title":"书评:从圣经中的男人和女人中恢复过来:教会如何需要重新发现她的目的,作者:艾米·伯德","authors":"Gracilynn J. Hanson","doi":"10.1177/07398913221122947h","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"secondary. Yet, Barr points out that as a woman’s so-called “calling” would be the “highest” if she remained at home, the calling of men grew even more broad and public facing. This is a message the church must hear: attaching calling language to any job, task or role only maintains the patriarchy. God’s people are called to be righteous and holy in relationship to him. While tasks may indicate one’s commitment to respond to that call, the tasks do not become the call. Barr demonstrates how the abuse of the word “calling” has kept women silent in their homes. Barr’s historical expertise adds to the courageous body of knowledge that is continually revealing the consequences of complementarianism. Her work comes alongside the biblical scholarship of Cynthia Westfall (2016), the cultural-theological perspective of Alice Matthews (2017) and the socio-political work of Kristin Kobes Du Mez (2020). She is in good company. While some parts of the book say what other voices have said (i.e., regarding Paul’s general view of women), other parts could only have been said by a careful historian. The reader of this book must be willing to challenge assumptions that have grown long roots in church, family, and political structures. It takes willingness to read this and lay down the stereotypes of how women are viewed both in the church and in the world. Men in leadership need to read this book so that they can grow in their advocacy for women. Women who don’t need another agenda, but who need plainly spoken perspective in order to put words to pain and confusion related to this topic will be enlivened by its implications. Because the biblical womanhood movement does not stay in one domain, neither does Barr. Biblical womanhood affects how evangelicals vote, organize, and contribute to the world and this book meets these adherents at every turn with valid questions of legitimacy, decency, and spirituality. If these devotees are willing to listen, then they are the primary reader Barr hopes to reach.","PeriodicalId":135435,"journal":{"name":"Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book review: Recovering from biblical manhood and womanhood: How the church needs to rediscover her purpose by Aimee Byrd\",\"authors\":\"Gracilynn J. Hanson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07398913221122947h\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"secondary. Yet, Barr points out that as a woman’s so-called “calling” would be the “highest” if she remained at home, the calling of men grew even more broad and public facing. This is a message the church must hear: attaching calling language to any job, task or role only maintains the patriarchy. God’s people are called to be righteous and holy in relationship to him. While tasks may indicate one’s commitment to respond to that call, the tasks do not become the call. Barr demonstrates how the abuse of the word “calling” has kept women silent in their homes. Barr’s historical expertise adds to the courageous body of knowledge that is continually revealing the consequences of complementarianism. Her work comes alongside the biblical scholarship of Cynthia Westfall (2016), the cultural-theological perspective of Alice Matthews (2017) and the socio-political work of Kristin Kobes Du Mez (2020). She is in good company. While some parts of the book say what other voices have said (i.e., regarding Paul’s general view of women), other parts could only have been said by a careful historian. The reader of this book must be willing to challenge assumptions that have grown long roots in church, family, and political structures. It takes willingness to read this and lay down the stereotypes of how women are viewed both in the church and in the world. Men in leadership need to read this book so that they can grow in their advocacy for women. Women who don’t need another agenda, but who need plainly spoken perspective in order to put words to pain and confusion related to this topic will be enlivened by its implications. Because the biblical womanhood movement does not stay in one domain, neither does Barr. Biblical womanhood affects how evangelicals vote, organize, and contribute to the world and this book meets these adherents at every turn with valid questions of legitimacy, decency, and spirituality. If these devotees are willing to listen, then they are the primary reader Barr hopes to reach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":135435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07398913221122947h\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07398913221122947h","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

次要的。然而,巴尔指出,如果一个女人呆在家里,她所谓的“使命”将是“最高的”,而男人的使命则变得更加广泛和公开。这是教会必须听到的信息:将呼召的语言附加到任何工作、任务或角色上,只会维持父权制。神的子民被呼召在与神的关系中成为公义和圣洁的。虽然任务可能表明一个人对该调用的响应承诺,但任务不会成为该调用。巴尔展示了滥用“呼召”这个词是如何让女性在家中保持沉默的。巴尔的历史专业知识增加了勇敢的知识体系,不断揭示互补主义的后果。她的作品与辛西娅·韦斯特福尔(2016)的圣经学术、爱丽丝·马修斯(2017)的文化神学视角和克里斯汀·科比斯·杜·梅兹(2020)的社会政治作品齐名。她有个好伙伴。虽然这本书的某些部分说的是其他人说过的话(即,关于保罗对女性的总体看法),但其他部分只能由细心的历史学家说出来。这本书的读者必须愿意挑战那些在教会、家庭和政治结构中长期扎根的假设。读这篇文章,放下教会和世界对女性的刻板印象,这需要你的意愿。领导阶层的男性需要阅读这本书,这样他们才能在支持女性方面成长。那些不需要另一个议程,但需要明确的观点来表达与这个话题相关的痛苦和困惑的女性,将会被它的含义所激活。因为圣经中的女性运动并不局限于一个领域,巴尔也是如此。圣经中的女性影响着福音派的投票、组织和对世界的贡献,这本书在每一个转折点都以合法性、体面和灵性的有效问题满足了这些信徒。如果这些忠实读者愿意倾听,那么他们就是巴尔希望触及的主要读者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book review: Recovering from biblical manhood and womanhood: How the church needs to rediscover her purpose by Aimee Byrd
secondary. Yet, Barr points out that as a woman’s so-called “calling” would be the “highest” if she remained at home, the calling of men grew even more broad and public facing. This is a message the church must hear: attaching calling language to any job, task or role only maintains the patriarchy. God’s people are called to be righteous and holy in relationship to him. While tasks may indicate one’s commitment to respond to that call, the tasks do not become the call. Barr demonstrates how the abuse of the word “calling” has kept women silent in their homes. Barr’s historical expertise adds to the courageous body of knowledge that is continually revealing the consequences of complementarianism. Her work comes alongside the biblical scholarship of Cynthia Westfall (2016), the cultural-theological perspective of Alice Matthews (2017) and the socio-political work of Kristin Kobes Du Mez (2020). She is in good company. While some parts of the book say what other voices have said (i.e., regarding Paul’s general view of women), other parts could only have been said by a careful historian. The reader of this book must be willing to challenge assumptions that have grown long roots in church, family, and political structures. It takes willingness to read this and lay down the stereotypes of how women are viewed both in the church and in the world. Men in leadership need to read this book so that they can grow in their advocacy for women. Women who don’t need another agenda, but who need plainly spoken perspective in order to put words to pain and confusion related to this topic will be enlivened by its implications. Because the biblical womanhood movement does not stay in one domain, neither does Barr. Biblical womanhood affects how evangelicals vote, organize, and contribute to the world and this book meets these adherents at every turn with valid questions of legitimacy, decency, and spirituality. If these devotees are willing to listen, then they are the primary reader Barr hopes to reach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信