重新获得存在的奖学金

M. Kaika, H. Ernstson, E. Swyngedouw
{"title":"重新获得存在的奖学金","authors":"M. Kaika, H. Ernstson, E. Swyngedouw","doi":"10.4324/9781315210537-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter questions the rapid ascent of “the Anthropocene” within critical humanities and social science, arguing that the imaginary of the Anthropocene itself may in fact be the most political thing about it. Even critical engagement adds symbolic power and scholarly weight to an emergent new master narrative that “naturalizes” capitalism. The chapter traces how a renewed intellectual responsibility could be configured through co-researching processes of subjectification, commoning, resistance, and hope—to give symbolic and ontological gravitas to alternative reconfigurations. This “scholarship of presence” can construct an archaeology for a new future, producing alternative master frames and radical imaginaries for socio-environmental change.","PeriodicalId":383819,"journal":{"name":"Urban Political Ecology in the Anthropo-obscene","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reclaiming a scholarship of presence\",\"authors\":\"M. Kaika, H. Ernstson, E. Swyngedouw\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315210537-13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter questions the rapid ascent of “the Anthropocene” within critical humanities and social science, arguing that the imaginary of the Anthropocene itself may in fact be the most political thing about it. Even critical engagement adds symbolic power and scholarly weight to an emergent new master narrative that “naturalizes” capitalism. The chapter traces how a renewed intellectual responsibility could be configured through co-researching processes of subjectification, commoning, resistance, and hope—to give symbolic and ontological gravitas to alternative reconfigurations. This “scholarship of presence” can construct an archaeology for a new future, producing alternative master frames and radical imaginaries for socio-environmental change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Political Ecology in the Anthropo-obscene\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Political Ecology in the Anthropo-obscene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315210537-13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Political Ecology in the Anthropo-obscene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315210537-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本章质疑“人类世”在批判性人文和社会科学中的迅速崛起,认为人类世本身的想象实际上可能是最具政治性的东西。即使是批判性的参与,也为新兴的“自然化”资本主义的大师叙事增添了象征力量和学术分量。本章追溯了如何通过主体化、共通性、抵抗和希望的共同研究过程来配置一种新的知识责任——为可选择的重新配置赋予象征性和本体论的庄严。这种“存在的学术”可以为新的未来构建考古学,为社会环境变化产生替代的主框架和激进的想象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reclaiming a scholarship of presence
This chapter questions the rapid ascent of “the Anthropocene” within critical humanities and social science, arguing that the imaginary of the Anthropocene itself may in fact be the most political thing about it. Even critical engagement adds symbolic power and scholarly weight to an emergent new master narrative that “naturalizes” capitalism. The chapter traces how a renewed intellectual responsibility could be configured through co-researching processes of subjectification, commoning, resistance, and hope—to give symbolic and ontological gravitas to alternative reconfigurations. This “scholarship of presence” can construct an archaeology for a new future, producing alternative master frames and radical imaginaries for socio-environmental change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信