大学中的无形资产:衡量和报告的当前挑战

L. Cañibano, M. Sánchez
{"title":"大学中的无形资产:衡量和报告的当前挑战","authors":"L. Cañibano, M. Sánchez","doi":"10.1108/14013380910968610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss whether the mechanisms used to measure and manage intangibles in companies can be applied to universities and other research institutions. Design/methodology/approach – The characteristics of the issues is addressed by companies in relation to their intellectual capital (IC) and how they manage them are reviewed to discuss whether universities can apply the same framework. External pressures for change and barriers universities encounter, particularly due to the current governance system, are discussed. The experience of some universities are briefly described. Findings – The companies’ framework is possible to be used by universities, with some specificity. Research limitations/implications – The number of universities actually applying this framework is small and therefore the results cannot be generalized. Practical implications – Policy measures are needed to encourage research institutions and universities to measure and manage their IC. In a knowledge-based society, the main knowledge producers should be more accountable for their activities. Originality/value – The use of IC concepts to analyze universities’ performance is still scarce. This is an attempt to fill such lacuna.","PeriodicalId":119134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"48","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intangibles in universities: current challenges for measuring and reporting\",\"authors\":\"L. Cañibano, M. Sánchez\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/14013380910968610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss whether the mechanisms used to measure and manage intangibles in companies can be applied to universities and other research institutions. Design/methodology/approach – The characteristics of the issues is addressed by companies in relation to their intellectual capital (IC) and how they manage them are reviewed to discuss whether universities can apply the same framework. External pressures for change and barriers universities encounter, particularly due to the current governance system, are discussed. The experience of some universities are briefly described. Findings – The companies’ framework is possible to be used by universities, with some specificity. Research limitations/implications – The number of universities actually applying this framework is small and therefore the results cannot be generalized. Practical implications – Policy measures are needed to encourage research institutions and universities to measure and manage their IC. In a knowledge-based society, the main knowledge producers should be more accountable for their activities. Originality/value – The use of IC concepts to analyze universities’ performance is still scarce. This is an attempt to fill such lacuna.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"48\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/14013380910968610\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/14013380910968610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

摘要

目的-本文的目的是讨论用于衡量和管理公司无形资产的机制是否可以应用于大学和其他研究机构。设计/方法/方法-公司解决与他们的智力资本(IC)有关的问题的特点,以及他们如何管理这些问题,讨论大学是否可以应用相同的框架。讨论了变革的外部压力和大学遇到的障碍,特别是由于当前的治理体系。简要介绍了一些大学的经验。研究发现——这些公司的框架有可能被大学采用,但有一些特殊性。研究限制/影响——实际应用这一框架的大学数量很少,因此结果不能一概推而广之。实际影响-需要采取政策措施,鼓励研究机构和大学衡量和管理他们的知识创新。在知识型社会,主要的知识生产者应该对他们的活动更负责。独创性/价值——利用集成电路概念来分析大学绩效的方法仍然很少。这是填补这一空白的一种尝试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intangibles in universities: current challenges for measuring and reporting
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss whether the mechanisms used to measure and manage intangibles in companies can be applied to universities and other research institutions. Design/methodology/approach – The characteristics of the issues is addressed by companies in relation to their intellectual capital (IC) and how they manage them are reviewed to discuss whether universities can apply the same framework. External pressures for change and barriers universities encounter, particularly due to the current governance system, are discussed. The experience of some universities are briefly described. Findings – The companies’ framework is possible to be used by universities, with some specificity. Research limitations/implications – The number of universities actually applying this framework is small and therefore the results cannot be generalized. Practical implications – Policy measures are needed to encourage research institutions and universities to measure and manage their IC. In a knowledge-based society, the main knowledge producers should be more accountable for their activities. Originality/value – The use of IC concepts to analyze universities’ performance is still scarce. This is an attempt to fill such lacuna.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信