{"title":"燃烧诱导涡击穿火焰闪回的大涡模拟","authors":"E. Tangermann, M. Klein, M. Pfitzner","doi":"10.1615/tsfp9.170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flame flashback is a major concern during the design of lean premixed gas turbine combustors. One particular mechanism of flame flashback in swirl stabilized combustors is the combustion induced vortex breakdown (CIVB), where the flame can propagate upstream against flow velocities far higher than the local turbulent flame speed. In the present work flame flashback by CIVB has been investigated for two combustors of different scale using large eddy simulation. The LES offers full access to a well resolved flow field and allows a detailed analysis of the fluid mechanical processes happening around the flame tip. The method is shown being able to reproduce the operating points limiting stable operation. The analysis of each flashback process then reveals, that the driving mechanism is different for both combustors depending on their size and the swirl velocity field. Either a baroclinic push or a flame propagation by stretching of the flow can be observed. INTRODUCTION Lean premixed combustion in gas turbine burners is an effective way to reduce NOx emissions. However, a major concern is the stability of the combustion process, since ignitable gas is present upstream of the combustion zone bringing the risk of flame flashback, and since the lean flame needs to be prevented from extinction by sophisticated stabilization mechanisms. Several ways of flame stabilization are common, usually they feature the recirculation of burnt, hot gas to provide activation energy for the ignition of fresh gas. The recirculation can be realized in the wake of a body or by fluid mechanical instabilities like a vortex breakdown, the latter of which has been used in the presently investigated configurations. The premixed flow enters the burner from a plenum through a swirl generator into a mixing tub, where a perfect mixture of the reactants is achieved in the swirling flow. A vortex breakdown is forced at the entry of the combustion chamber caused by the sudden change in diameter of the confining walls. The thus created recirculation zone transports hot burnt gas upstream igniting the arriving fresh gas. The vortex breakdown can also be caused by an obstacle located on the centreline. Inside a recirculation zone the flame front can act as such an obstacle and influence the vortex breakdown. The so called combustion induced vortex breakdown (CIVB) has been described by Fritz et al. (2004). If the flame front is located far enough upstream within the swirl tube it can push the vortex breakdown further upstream, which itself pulls the flame even further upstream. The recirculation zone propagates against the flow at a higher velocity than the local turbulent flame speed. Due to the confinement the experimental access to the propagating flame is very limited. Most of the process takes place inside the mixing tube. By using a silica glass mixing tube optical measurement can be used with some restrictions (Fritz 2004, Konle 2008). The curved surface leads to bending effects of the light and parts of the images are superimposed by reflections and thus become unusable. Numerical simulation offers a far more detailed view to the flow, each component of the flow field can be accessed at every time step regardless of geometrical restrictions. This allows to deeply analyse the fluid mechanical phenomena and to identify the mechanisms which are the reason of the flame flashback by CIVB. Several studies have investigated the phenomenon previously to identify the fluid dynamical mechanism of the CIVB. The dominant production terms of circumferential vorticity, which induce the flow deceleration upstream of the vortex breakdown, have been assessed. From the correlation between flashback and swirl velocities observed in his experiments, Fritz (2004) deduces that the stretching around the flame drives the CIVB. Kiesewetter (2005) has performed RANS simulations of the process and extracted the vorticity production terms from CFD data indicating a baroclinic mechanism. From LES of the CIVB in an unconfined vortex Kröger (2010), in agreement with the model by Fritz, shows the stretching around the flame as the dominant term. Kröger (unlike Kiesewetter) has investigated the flow deceleration induced by the production terms, while Kiesewetter only has regarded the local vorticity production. In the present study two swirl stabilized combustor models without a central body have been investigated using June 30 July 3, 2015 Melbourne, Australia 9 1C-5","PeriodicalId":196124,"journal":{"name":"Proceeding of Ninth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large Eddy Simulation of Flame Flashback by Combustion Induced Vortex Breakdown\",\"authors\":\"E. Tangermann, M. Klein, M. Pfitzner\",\"doi\":\"10.1615/tsfp9.170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Flame flashback is a major concern during the design of lean premixed gas turbine combustors. One particular mechanism of flame flashback in swirl stabilized combustors is the combustion induced vortex breakdown (CIVB), where the flame can propagate upstream against flow velocities far higher than the local turbulent flame speed. In the present work flame flashback by CIVB has been investigated for two combustors of different scale using large eddy simulation. The LES offers full access to a well resolved flow field and allows a detailed analysis of the fluid mechanical processes happening around the flame tip. The method is shown being able to reproduce the operating points limiting stable operation. The analysis of each flashback process then reveals, that the driving mechanism is different for both combustors depending on their size and the swirl velocity field. Either a baroclinic push or a flame propagation by stretching of the flow can be observed. INTRODUCTION Lean premixed combustion in gas turbine burners is an effective way to reduce NOx emissions. However, a major concern is the stability of the combustion process, since ignitable gas is present upstream of the combustion zone bringing the risk of flame flashback, and since the lean flame needs to be prevented from extinction by sophisticated stabilization mechanisms. Several ways of flame stabilization are common, usually they feature the recirculation of burnt, hot gas to provide activation energy for the ignition of fresh gas. The recirculation can be realized in the wake of a body or by fluid mechanical instabilities like a vortex breakdown, the latter of which has been used in the presently investigated configurations. The premixed flow enters the burner from a plenum through a swirl generator into a mixing tub, where a perfect mixture of the reactants is achieved in the swirling flow. A vortex breakdown is forced at the entry of the combustion chamber caused by the sudden change in diameter of the confining walls. The thus created recirculation zone transports hot burnt gas upstream igniting the arriving fresh gas. The vortex breakdown can also be caused by an obstacle located on the centreline. Inside a recirculation zone the flame front can act as such an obstacle and influence the vortex breakdown. The so called combustion induced vortex breakdown (CIVB) has been described by Fritz et al. (2004). If the flame front is located far enough upstream within the swirl tube it can push the vortex breakdown further upstream, which itself pulls the flame even further upstream. The recirculation zone propagates against the flow at a higher velocity than the local turbulent flame speed. Due to the confinement the experimental access to the propagating flame is very limited. Most of the process takes place inside the mixing tube. By using a silica glass mixing tube optical measurement can be used with some restrictions (Fritz 2004, Konle 2008). The curved surface leads to bending effects of the light and parts of the images are superimposed by reflections and thus become unusable. Numerical simulation offers a far more detailed view to the flow, each component of the flow field can be accessed at every time step regardless of geometrical restrictions. This allows to deeply analyse the fluid mechanical phenomena and to identify the mechanisms which are the reason of the flame flashback by CIVB. Several studies have investigated the phenomenon previously to identify the fluid dynamical mechanism of the CIVB. The dominant production terms of circumferential vorticity, which induce the flow deceleration upstream of the vortex breakdown, have been assessed. From the correlation between flashback and swirl velocities observed in his experiments, Fritz (2004) deduces that the stretching around the flame drives the CIVB. Kiesewetter (2005) has performed RANS simulations of the process and extracted the vorticity production terms from CFD data indicating a baroclinic mechanism. From LES of the CIVB in an unconfined vortex Kröger (2010), in agreement with the model by Fritz, shows the stretching around the flame as the dominant term. Kröger (unlike Kiesewetter) has investigated the flow deceleration induced by the production terms, while Kiesewetter only has regarded the local vorticity production. In the present study two swirl stabilized combustor models without a central body have been investigated using June 30 July 3, 2015 Melbourne, Australia 9 1C-5\",\"PeriodicalId\":196124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceeding of Ninth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceeding of Ninth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1615/tsfp9.170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeding of Ninth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/tsfp9.170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
火焰闪回是精益预混燃气轮机燃烧室设计中的一个重要问题。涡流稳定燃烧器中火焰闪回的一种特殊机制是燃烧诱导涡流击穿(CIVB),其中火焰可以在远高于局部湍流火焰速度的流速下向上传播。本文采用大涡模拟的方法,对两种不同规模燃烧室的CIVB火焰闪回进行了研究。LES提供了完整的流场解析,并允许对火焰尖端周围发生的流体力学过程进行详细分析。结果表明,该方法能够再现出限制稳定运行的工作点。通过对每次闪回过程的分析,发现两种燃烧室的驱动机制是不同的,这取决于燃烧室的大小和旋流速度场。可以观察到斜压推进或通过拉伸流动的火焰传播。燃气轮机燃烧器的精益预混燃烧是减少NOx排放的有效途径。然而,一个主要的问题是燃烧过程的稳定性,因为可燃气体存在于燃烧区域的上游,带来了火焰闪回的风险,而且由于稀薄的火焰需要通过复杂的稳定机制来防止熄灭。几种稳定火焰的方法是常见的,通常它们的特点是燃烧的热气体的再循环,为新鲜气体的点火提供活化能。再循环可以在物体的尾迹中实现,也可以通过流体力学不稳定性(如漩涡破裂)来实现,后者已用于目前研究的构型。预混合流从一个静压室进入燃烧器,通过一个涡流发生器进入一个混合盆,在那里,在旋转流中实现了反应物的完美混合。由于围壁直径的突然变化,在燃烧室入口处产生涡流破裂。由此形成的再循环区向上游输送热燃烧气体,点燃到达的新鲜气体。位于中线的障碍物也可能导致漩涡破裂。在再循环区内,火焰锋面可以作为这样一个障碍,并影响漩涡的破裂。Fritz et al.(2004)描述了所谓的燃烧诱导涡击穿(CIVB)。如果火焰锋面位于漩涡管内足够远的上游,它可以推动漩涡破裂进一步上游,这本身将火焰拉到更远的上游。再循环区以比局部湍流火焰速度更高的速度逆流传播。由于这种限制,实验对火焰传播的接近非常有限。大部分的过程在混合管内进行。通过使用硅玻璃混合管,光学测量可以在一些限制下使用(Fritz 2004, Konle 2008)。弯曲的表面导致光的弯曲效应,部分图像被反射叠加,从而变得不可用。数值模拟提供了一个更详细的流动视图,流场的每个组成部分都可以在每个时间步上访问,而不受几何限制。这可以深入分析流体力学现象,并确定CIVB火焰闪回的原因机制。一些研究已经调查了这一现象,以确定CIVB的流体动力学机制。在涡旋破裂上游引起气流减速的周向涡量的主要产生项已被评估。Fritz(2004)从他在实验中观察到的闪回和漩涡速度之间的相关性推断出火焰周围的拉伸驱动了CIVB。Kiesewetter(2005)对这一过程进行了RANS模拟,并从表明斜压机制的CFD数据中提取了涡度产生项。来自CIVB在无约束涡Kröger(2010)的LES,与Fritz的模型一致,表明火焰周围的拉伸是主导项。Kröger(与Kiesewetter不同)研究了由生产项引起的流动减速,而Kiesewetter只考虑了局部涡量产生。在目前的研究中,两种没有中心体的涡流稳定燃烧室模型已经在2015年6月30日至7月3日在澳大利亚墨尔本进行了研究
Large Eddy Simulation of Flame Flashback by Combustion Induced Vortex Breakdown
Flame flashback is a major concern during the design of lean premixed gas turbine combustors. One particular mechanism of flame flashback in swirl stabilized combustors is the combustion induced vortex breakdown (CIVB), where the flame can propagate upstream against flow velocities far higher than the local turbulent flame speed. In the present work flame flashback by CIVB has been investigated for two combustors of different scale using large eddy simulation. The LES offers full access to a well resolved flow field and allows a detailed analysis of the fluid mechanical processes happening around the flame tip. The method is shown being able to reproduce the operating points limiting stable operation. The analysis of each flashback process then reveals, that the driving mechanism is different for both combustors depending on their size and the swirl velocity field. Either a baroclinic push or a flame propagation by stretching of the flow can be observed. INTRODUCTION Lean premixed combustion in gas turbine burners is an effective way to reduce NOx emissions. However, a major concern is the stability of the combustion process, since ignitable gas is present upstream of the combustion zone bringing the risk of flame flashback, and since the lean flame needs to be prevented from extinction by sophisticated stabilization mechanisms. Several ways of flame stabilization are common, usually they feature the recirculation of burnt, hot gas to provide activation energy for the ignition of fresh gas. The recirculation can be realized in the wake of a body or by fluid mechanical instabilities like a vortex breakdown, the latter of which has been used in the presently investigated configurations. The premixed flow enters the burner from a plenum through a swirl generator into a mixing tub, where a perfect mixture of the reactants is achieved in the swirling flow. A vortex breakdown is forced at the entry of the combustion chamber caused by the sudden change in diameter of the confining walls. The thus created recirculation zone transports hot burnt gas upstream igniting the arriving fresh gas. The vortex breakdown can also be caused by an obstacle located on the centreline. Inside a recirculation zone the flame front can act as such an obstacle and influence the vortex breakdown. The so called combustion induced vortex breakdown (CIVB) has been described by Fritz et al. (2004). If the flame front is located far enough upstream within the swirl tube it can push the vortex breakdown further upstream, which itself pulls the flame even further upstream. The recirculation zone propagates against the flow at a higher velocity than the local turbulent flame speed. Due to the confinement the experimental access to the propagating flame is very limited. Most of the process takes place inside the mixing tube. By using a silica glass mixing tube optical measurement can be used with some restrictions (Fritz 2004, Konle 2008). The curved surface leads to bending effects of the light and parts of the images are superimposed by reflections and thus become unusable. Numerical simulation offers a far more detailed view to the flow, each component of the flow field can be accessed at every time step regardless of geometrical restrictions. This allows to deeply analyse the fluid mechanical phenomena and to identify the mechanisms which are the reason of the flame flashback by CIVB. Several studies have investigated the phenomenon previously to identify the fluid dynamical mechanism of the CIVB. The dominant production terms of circumferential vorticity, which induce the flow deceleration upstream of the vortex breakdown, have been assessed. From the correlation between flashback and swirl velocities observed in his experiments, Fritz (2004) deduces that the stretching around the flame drives the CIVB. Kiesewetter (2005) has performed RANS simulations of the process and extracted the vorticity production terms from CFD data indicating a baroclinic mechanism. From LES of the CIVB in an unconfined vortex Kröger (2010), in agreement with the model by Fritz, shows the stretching around the flame as the dominant term. Kröger (unlike Kiesewetter) has investigated the flow deceleration induced by the production terms, while Kiesewetter only has regarded the local vorticity production. In the present study two swirl stabilized combustor models without a central body have been investigated using June 30 July 3, 2015 Melbourne, Australia 9 1C-5