错误的无效婚姻判决和正式的第二次婚姻:2013年2月11日第二学院之后的法律apax

Ludovic Danto
{"title":"错误的无效婚姻判决和正式的第二次婚姻:2013年2月11日第二学院之后的法律apax","authors":"Ludovic Danto","doi":"10.21697/im.2019.30.2.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of the article is the 2nd point of rescript of Benedict XVI of February 11, 2013: \"Before the Roman Rota, it is not possible to apply for a new referral (nova causae propositio) after one of the parties has entered into a new canonical marriage\", supplemented by 2nd point, 3 rescript of Francis of August 15, 2015 to add a final clause: \"provided that the decision is clearly unfair\". \nIn the first part of this study, the author discusses the canonical principle about a quasi-judged thing and the truth about the marriage bond, in order to conclude in the second part that both of the above-mentioned papal rescripts (the second one is more restrictive) limit the application of this principle in the cases indicated there, which prompts the question of the status of the second marriage defined by these norms. \nIn the summary Author assumes that if the norm (of the rescript) is expected to last, it cannot conclude that the new \"canonical\" spouses are in the new sacramental marriage, but rather it should be assumed that they are in a canonically recognized, however non-sacramental, relationship.","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sentence matrimoniale pro nullitate erronée et secondes noces canoniques: un apax juridique à la suite de la faculté II du 11 février 2013\",\"authors\":\"Ludovic Danto\",\"doi\":\"10.21697/im.2019.30.2.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The subject of the article is the 2nd point of rescript of Benedict XVI of February 11, 2013: \\\"Before the Roman Rota, it is not possible to apply for a new referral (nova causae propositio) after one of the parties has entered into a new canonical marriage\\\", supplemented by 2nd point, 3 rescript of Francis of August 15, 2015 to add a final clause: \\\"provided that the decision is clearly unfair\\\". \\nIn the first part of this study, the author discusses the canonical principle about a quasi-judged thing and the truth about the marriage bond, in order to conclude in the second part that both of the above-mentioned papal rescripts (the second one is more restrictive) limit the application of this principle in the cases indicated there, which prompts the question of the status of the second marriage defined by these norms. \\nIn the summary Author assumes that if the norm (of the rescript) is expected to last, it cannot conclude that the new \\\"canonical\\\" spouses are in the new sacramental marriage, but rather it should be assumed that they are in a canonically recognized, however non-sacramental, relationship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ius Matrimoniale\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ius Matrimoniale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2019.30.2.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ius Matrimoniale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2019.30.2.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的主题是2013年2月11日本笃十六世诏书的第2点:“在罗马Rota之前,在一方进入新的规范婚姻后,不可能申请新的转请(nova causae proposition)”,并补充了2015年8月15日方济各诏书的第2点第3条,增加了最后一条:“如果该决定明显不公平”。在本研究的第一部分中,作者讨论了准被判事物的规范原则和婚姻关系的真相,以便在第二部分中得出结论,上述两份教皇诏书(第二份更严格)限制了该原则在上述情况下的适用,这引发了这些规范所定义的第二次婚姻地位的问题。在摘要中,作者假设,如果规范(命令)预期将持续下去,它不能得出结论,新的“规范”的配偶是在新的圣礼婚姻,而是应该假设他们是在一个规范承认,但非圣礼,关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sentence matrimoniale pro nullitate erronée et secondes noces canoniques: un apax juridique à la suite de la faculté II du 11 février 2013
The subject of the article is the 2nd point of rescript of Benedict XVI of February 11, 2013: "Before the Roman Rota, it is not possible to apply for a new referral (nova causae propositio) after one of the parties has entered into a new canonical marriage", supplemented by 2nd point, 3 rescript of Francis of August 15, 2015 to add a final clause: "provided that the decision is clearly unfair". In the first part of this study, the author discusses the canonical principle about a quasi-judged thing and the truth about the marriage bond, in order to conclude in the second part that both of the above-mentioned papal rescripts (the second one is more restrictive) limit the application of this principle in the cases indicated there, which prompts the question of the status of the second marriage defined by these norms. In the summary Author assumes that if the norm (of the rescript) is expected to last, it cannot conclude that the new "canonical" spouses are in the new sacramental marriage, but rather it should be assumed that they are in a canonically recognized, however non-sacramental, relationship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信