德国的银行系统。研究问题—前景(第一部分)

H. Rehm
{"title":"德国的银行系统。研究问题—前景(第一部分)","authors":"H. Rehm","doi":"10.3790/KUK.41.2.135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A recurrent element in the debate on the future of the German banking system is the claim that Germany is “overbanked”, as a result of which its banking industry suffers from structurally induced weakness in its profitability. This thesis does not stand up to any thoroughgoing analysis. According to the findings of empirical studies, the productivity of German banks is above average by international standards. The relatively low level of profitability is due not to the banks being too small or to their cost structures being too inefficient, but to the relatively low margins they are able to achieve as a result of the intense competition between them. This is of benefit to consumers, who pay considerably less for banking services than in countries such as Italy or the UK. In view of this (positive) market effect, it is difficult to understand why so many people should be raising their voices to demand changes to the organisational and regulatory framework which would allow a greater consolidation of the German banking market, especially as it has so far not been possible to demonstrate any connection between the size of banking institutions and profitability in the sector. The question needs to be asked – and that not only in view of the most recent crisis on the financial markets – whether the capital market orientated approach is the right one to pursue when determining the regulatory structure of the banking sector. The way the rating agencies, with their less than transparent methodologies, differentiate in their assessments between the various elements of the value chain in banking, the effects of market-orientated accounting practices in terms of high volatility in the reporting of results, and dysfunctional corporate governance all give rise to doubts about the advisability of such an orientation. The recent financial crisis has served only to reinforce these doubts. What consequences in terms of structural and regulatory models for the banking sector can be drawn from the current turbulences on the markets will be discussed in a further article in the next issue of this magazine.","PeriodicalId":280048,"journal":{"name":"Kredit Und Kapital","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Das deutsche Bankensystem. Befund – Probleme – Perspektiven (Teil I)\",\"authors\":\"H. Rehm\",\"doi\":\"10.3790/KUK.41.2.135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A recurrent element in the debate on the future of the German banking system is the claim that Germany is “overbanked”, as a result of which its banking industry suffers from structurally induced weakness in its profitability. This thesis does not stand up to any thoroughgoing analysis. According to the findings of empirical studies, the productivity of German banks is above average by international standards. The relatively low level of profitability is due not to the banks being too small or to their cost structures being too inefficient, but to the relatively low margins they are able to achieve as a result of the intense competition between them. This is of benefit to consumers, who pay considerably less for banking services than in countries such as Italy or the UK. In view of this (positive) market effect, it is difficult to understand why so many people should be raising their voices to demand changes to the organisational and regulatory framework which would allow a greater consolidation of the German banking market, especially as it has so far not been possible to demonstrate any connection between the size of banking institutions and profitability in the sector. The question needs to be asked – and that not only in view of the most recent crisis on the financial markets – whether the capital market orientated approach is the right one to pursue when determining the regulatory structure of the banking sector. The way the rating agencies, with their less than transparent methodologies, differentiate in their assessments between the various elements of the value chain in banking, the effects of market-orientated accounting practices in terms of high volatility in the reporting of results, and dysfunctional corporate governance all give rise to doubts about the advisability of such an orientation. The recent financial crisis has served only to reinforce these doubts. What consequences in terms of structural and regulatory models for the banking sector can be drawn from the current turbulences on the markets will be discussed in a further article in the next issue of this magazine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":280048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kredit Und Kapital\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kredit Und Kapital\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3790/KUK.41.2.135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kredit Und Kapital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/KUK.41.2.135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

在有关德国银行体系未来的辩论中,一个反复出现的因素是,有人声称德国“过度银行化”,其结果是,德国银行业的盈利能力受到结构性因素的影响。这篇论文经不住任何彻底的分析。实证研究发现,以国际标准衡量,德国银行的生产率处于中等偏上水平。相对较低的盈利水平不是由于银行规模太小或其成本结构效率太低,而是由于它们之间的激烈竞争导致它们能够实现相对较低的利润率。这对消费者有利,他们为银行服务支付的费用远低于意大利或英国等国。鉴于这种(积极的)市场效应,很难理解为什么这么多人应该提高他们的声音,要求改变组织和监管框架,这将允许德国银行市场进行更大的整合,特别是因为到目前为止还不可能证明银行机构的规模和该部门的盈利能力之间存在任何联系。在确定银行业监管结构时,以资本市场为导向的方法是否正确,这不仅是考虑到最近金融市场的危机,也是我们需要问的问题。评级机构的评估方法不够透明,它们在评估银行业价值链的各个要素时加以区分,以市场为导向的会计实践在报告结果时的高波动性方面的影响,以及功能失调的公司治理,这些都让人怀疑这种导向的可取性。最近的金融危机只是强化了这些疑虑。从目前的市场动荡中可以得出银行业的结构和监管模式方面的后果,将在下一期杂志的另一篇文章中讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Das deutsche Bankensystem. Befund – Probleme – Perspektiven (Teil I)
A recurrent element in the debate on the future of the German banking system is the claim that Germany is “overbanked”, as a result of which its banking industry suffers from structurally induced weakness in its profitability. This thesis does not stand up to any thoroughgoing analysis. According to the findings of empirical studies, the productivity of German banks is above average by international standards. The relatively low level of profitability is due not to the banks being too small or to their cost structures being too inefficient, but to the relatively low margins they are able to achieve as a result of the intense competition between them. This is of benefit to consumers, who pay considerably less for banking services than in countries such as Italy or the UK. In view of this (positive) market effect, it is difficult to understand why so many people should be raising their voices to demand changes to the organisational and regulatory framework which would allow a greater consolidation of the German banking market, especially as it has so far not been possible to demonstrate any connection between the size of banking institutions and profitability in the sector. The question needs to be asked – and that not only in view of the most recent crisis on the financial markets – whether the capital market orientated approach is the right one to pursue when determining the regulatory structure of the banking sector. The way the rating agencies, with their less than transparent methodologies, differentiate in their assessments between the various elements of the value chain in banking, the effects of market-orientated accounting practices in terms of high volatility in the reporting of results, and dysfunctional corporate governance all give rise to doubts about the advisability of such an orientation. The recent financial crisis has served only to reinforce these doubts. What consequences in terms of structural and regulatory models for the banking sector can be drawn from the current turbulences on the markets will be discussed in a further article in the next issue of this magazine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信