支持dsml的工作台的比较分析:与重要的模型驱动开发需求的讨论

André Ribeiro, Luís Moreira de Sousa, A. Silva
{"title":"支持dsml的工作台的比较分析:与重要的模型驱动开发需求的讨论","authors":"André Ribeiro, Luís Moreira de Sousa, A. Silva","doi":"10.5220/0005745603230330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development and use of Domain Specific Languages emerged as a way to cope with complex problems using concepts closer to the problem domain. By leveraging the principles proposed by Model-Driven Development (MDD), like the separation of concerns and the use of model transformations, this approach became popular and caused the emergence of a variety of languages, known as Domain Specific Modeling Languages (DSMLs). Moreover, the use of DSMLs with graphical notations abstracts even more the problem domain, either by using extensions of UML or directly using metamodeling languages. The definition and use of DSMLs is only possible through specific tools, known as languages workbenches. This paper discusses the analysis and comparison of three of these tools (namely Papyrus, Enterprise Architect and Sirius) that were used to create the XIS-Mobile language, a non-trivial DSML defined as a UML profile for modeling mobile applications in a platform-independent way. These tools were evaluated considering a set of key criteria (namely learnability, usability, graphical completeness, validation support, transformation support, evolvability and interoperability) which show their suitability to develop non-trivial languages.","PeriodicalId":360028,"journal":{"name":"2016 4th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of workbenches to support DSMLs: Discussion with non-trivial Model-Driven Development needs\",\"authors\":\"André Ribeiro, Luís Moreira de Sousa, A. Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.5220/0005745603230330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The development and use of Domain Specific Languages emerged as a way to cope with complex problems using concepts closer to the problem domain. By leveraging the principles proposed by Model-Driven Development (MDD), like the separation of concerns and the use of model transformations, this approach became popular and caused the emergence of a variety of languages, known as Domain Specific Modeling Languages (DSMLs). Moreover, the use of DSMLs with graphical notations abstracts even more the problem domain, either by using extensions of UML or directly using metamodeling languages. The definition and use of DSMLs is only possible through specific tools, known as languages workbenches. This paper discusses the analysis and comparison of three of these tools (namely Papyrus, Enterprise Architect and Sirius) that were used to create the XIS-Mobile language, a non-trivial DSML defined as a UML profile for modeling mobile applications in a platform-independent way. These tools were evaluated considering a set of key criteria (namely learnability, usability, graphical completeness, validation support, transformation support, evolvability and interoperability) which show their suitability to develop non-trivial languages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 4th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 4th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5220/0005745603230330\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 4th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0005745603230330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

领域特定语言的开发和使用作为一种使用更接近问题领域的概念来处理复杂问题的方法而出现。通过利用模型驱动开发(MDD)提出的原则,比如关注点分离和模型转换的使用,这种方法变得流行起来,并导致了各种语言的出现,这些语言被称为领域特定建模语言(dsml)。此外,通过使用UML的扩展或直接使用元建模语言,使用带有图形符号的dsml甚至更加抽象了问题领域。dsml的定义和使用只能通过特定的工具(称为语言工作台)来实现。本文讨论了用于创建axis - mobile语言的三种工具(即Papyrus、Enterprise Architect和Sirius)的分析和比较,axis - mobile语言是一种重要的DSML,被定义为一种UML概要文件,用于以与平台无关的方式对移动应用程序进行建模。这些工具的评估考虑了一组关键标准(即易学性、可用性、图形完整性、验证支持、转换支持、可演化性和互操作性),这些标准显示了它们适合开发重要语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of workbenches to support DSMLs: Discussion with non-trivial Model-Driven Development needs
The development and use of Domain Specific Languages emerged as a way to cope with complex problems using concepts closer to the problem domain. By leveraging the principles proposed by Model-Driven Development (MDD), like the separation of concerns and the use of model transformations, this approach became popular and caused the emergence of a variety of languages, known as Domain Specific Modeling Languages (DSMLs). Moreover, the use of DSMLs with graphical notations abstracts even more the problem domain, either by using extensions of UML or directly using metamodeling languages. The definition and use of DSMLs is only possible through specific tools, known as languages workbenches. This paper discusses the analysis and comparison of three of these tools (namely Papyrus, Enterprise Architect and Sirius) that were used to create the XIS-Mobile language, a non-trivial DSML defined as a UML profile for modeling mobile applications in a platform-independent way. These tools were evaluated considering a set of key criteria (namely learnability, usability, graphical completeness, validation support, transformation support, evolvability and interoperability) which show their suitability to develop non-trivial languages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信