不亦步亦趋,也不总是亦步亦趋——衡平法和时效法

M. Leeming
{"title":"不亦步亦趋,也不总是亦步亦趋——衡平法和时效法","authors":"M. Leeming","doi":"10.5040/9781509995110.ch-014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Equity has applied limitation statutes by analogy for centuries. The way in which that occurs is complex and poorly understood but of considerable theoretical and practical interest. It is after all no small thing for a plaintiff to be denied relief by reason of a statutory limitation which does not in terms apply to the claim, but which is regarded as applicable by analogy. An analysis of the equitable doctrine illustrates a recurring phenomenon, that of the interrelationship between statute and judge-made law, including with concepts such as concealed fraud and even the equitable doctrine of applying statutes of limitation by analogy itself being enacted in terms in statutes.","PeriodicalId":166493,"journal":{"name":"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Not Slavishly Nor Always - Equity and Limitation Statutes\",\"authors\":\"M. Leeming\",\"doi\":\"10.5040/9781509995110.ch-014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Equity has applied limitation statutes by analogy for centuries. The way in which that occurs is complex and poorly understood but of considerable theoretical and practical interest. It is after all no small thing for a plaintiff to be denied relief by reason of a statutory limitation which does not in terms apply to the claim, but which is regarded as applicable by analogy. An analysis of the equitable doctrine illustrates a recurring phenomenon, that of the interrelationship between statute and judge-made law, including with concepts such as concealed fraud and even the equitable doctrine of applying statutes of limitation by analogy itself being enacted in terms in statutes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509995110.ch-014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509995110.ch-014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几个世纪以来,衡平法一直以类推的方式适用限制法规。发生这种情况的方式是复杂的,很难理解,但具有相当大的理论和实践意义。对于原告来说,由于法定时效而被拒绝给予救济,这毕竟不是一件小事,而法定时效在条款上并不适用于该索赔,但被认为是通过类比适用的。对衡平法原则的分析说明了一个反复出现的现象,即成文法和法官制定的法律之间的相互关系,包括诸如隐蔽欺诈等概念,甚至通过类比适用时效法的衡平法原则本身都是以成文法的术语颁布的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Not Slavishly Nor Always - Equity and Limitation Statutes
Equity has applied limitation statutes by analogy for centuries. The way in which that occurs is complex and poorly understood but of considerable theoretical and practical interest. It is after all no small thing for a plaintiff to be denied relief by reason of a statutory limitation which does not in terms apply to the claim, but which is regarded as applicable by analogy. An analysis of the equitable doctrine illustrates a recurring phenomenon, that of the interrelationship between statute and judge-made law, including with concepts such as concealed fraud and even the equitable doctrine of applying statutes of limitation by analogy itself being enacted in terms in statutes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信