动态能力与组织学习:组织更新中的社会政治紧张关系

E. Antonacopoulou, J. Ferdinand, M. Graça, M. Easterby-Smith
{"title":"动态能力与组织学习:组织更新中的社会政治紧张关系","authors":"E. Antonacopoulou, J. Ferdinand, M. Graça, M. Easterby-Smith","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1306958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If organizational renewal (becoming) is key to organizational survival why is it so difficult to come about and how might it be supported? This is the central question this paper will seek to explore by problematizing the current conceptualizations of organizational renewal, which are often limited to dualisms between stability, order and harmony on the one hand, and on the other hand, conflict, change and transformation. These dualisms are reflective of the kind of 'distal' mode of thinking Cooper and Law (1995) refer to which, prevent us from understanding and supporting organizational renewal as integral to the emergence of organization. This paper, therefore, argues for the need to understand multiplicities of organizing through dualities that permit us to come closer to the dynamic interaction between apparently oppositional forces. The analysis presented, will show that at the core of organizational renewal lie the balancing acts between macro and micro forces as they interact and negotiate order and disorder, which are central to self-organization (renewal). The paper explores these balancing acts by drawing on two recent ideas in Organisation Studies, which seek to support organisational renewal; Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Learning. The analysis focuses on the tensions that underpin the interaction between exogenous and endogenous forces. These tensions are examined through a socio-political lens revealing dynamic forms of organizing in the way macro (strategic activities) and micro (operational activities) practices are interconnected.","PeriodicalId":280189,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Institute of Management Research (AIM) Research Paper Series","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Learning: Socio-Political Tensions in Organizational Renewal\",\"authors\":\"E. Antonacopoulou, J. Ferdinand, M. Graça, M. Easterby-Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1306958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"If organizational renewal (becoming) is key to organizational survival why is it so difficult to come about and how might it be supported? This is the central question this paper will seek to explore by problematizing the current conceptualizations of organizational renewal, which are often limited to dualisms between stability, order and harmony on the one hand, and on the other hand, conflict, change and transformation. These dualisms are reflective of the kind of 'distal' mode of thinking Cooper and Law (1995) refer to which, prevent us from understanding and supporting organizational renewal as integral to the emergence of organization. This paper, therefore, argues for the need to understand multiplicities of organizing through dualities that permit us to come closer to the dynamic interaction between apparently oppositional forces. The analysis presented, will show that at the core of organizational renewal lie the balancing acts between macro and micro forces as they interact and negotiate order and disorder, which are central to self-organization (renewal). The paper explores these balancing acts by drawing on two recent ideas in Organisation Studies, which seek to support organisational renewal; Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Learning. The analysis focuses on the tensions that underpin the interaction between exogenous and endogenous forces. These tensions are examined through a socio-political lens revealing dynamic forms of organizing in the way macro (strategic activities) and micro (operational activities) practices are interconnected.\",\"PeriodicalId\":280189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Institute of Management Research (AIM) Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Institute of Management Research (AIM) Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1306958\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Institute of Management Research (AIM) Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1306958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

如果组织更新(成为)是组织生存的关键,为什么它如此难以实现?如何支持它?这是本文将通过对当前组织更新概念的问题化来探索的核心问题,这些概念通常局限于一方面是稳定、秩序与和谐,另一方面是冲突、变化和转型之间的二元论。这些二元论反映了Cooper和Law(1995)所提到的那种“远端”思维模式,这种思维模式阻止我们理解和支持组织更新作为组织出现的组成部分。因此,本文认为有必要通过二元性来理解组织的多样性,这使我们能够更接近明显对立力量之间的动态相互作用。所提出的分析将表明,组织更新的核心在于宏观和微观力量之间的平衡行为,因为它们相互作用并协商有序和无序,这是自组织(更新)的核心。本文通过借鉴组织研究中的两种最新观点来探讨这些平衡行为,这两种观点寻求支持组织更新;动态能力和组织学习。分析的重点是支撑外生和内生力量之间相互作用的紧张关系。这些紧张关系是通过社会政治的视角来审视的,揭示了宏观(战略活动)和微观(业务活动)实践相互联系的动态组织形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Learning: Socio-Political Tensions in Organizational Renewal
If organizational renewal (becoming) is key to organizational survival why is it so difficult to come about and how might it be supported? This is the central question this paper will seek to explore by problematizing the current conceptualizations of organizational renewal, which are often limited to dualisms between stability, order and harmony on the one hand, and on the other hand, conflict, change and transformation. These dualisms are reflective of the kind of 'distal' mode of thinking Cooper and Law (1995) refer to which, prevent us from understanding and supporting organizational renewal as integral to the emergence of organization. This paper, therefore, argues for the need to understand multiplicities of organizing through dualities that permit us to come closer to the dynamic interaction between apparently oppositional forces. The analysis presented, will show that at the core of organizational renewal lie the balancing acts between macro and micro forces as they interact and negotiate order and disorder, which are central to self-organization (renewal). The paper explores these balancing acts by drawing on two recent ideas in Organisation Studies, which seek to support organisational renewal; Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Learning. The analysis focuses on the tensions that underpin the interaction between exogenous and endogenous forces. These tensions are examined through a socio-political lens revealing dynamic forms of organizing in the way macro (strategic activities) and micro (operational activities) practices are interconnected.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信