基于胶囊网络的离线签名识别与验证

Dilara Gumusbas, T. Yıldırım
{"title":"基于胶囊网络的离线签名识别与验证","authors":"Dilara Gumusbas, T. Yıldırım","doi":"10.1109/INISTA.2019.8778228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In offline signature identification and verification systems, hand -crafted feature extraction methods, such as local binary patterns, have recently been set aside for automatic feature extraction methods such as convolutional neural networks (CNN). Although these CNN-based algorithms often obtain satisfying results, they require either many samples to find the best data representations or pre-trained network weights. To obviate the necessity of many samples as well as pre-trained weights, Capsule Network has recently claimed to achieve the best data representation using only a limited amount of data. This network not only obtains many variations of limited input samples via affine transformations in the algorithm but also uses hierarchical layers to select the most informative features without losing the exact informational position of the others. It is from this point of view that this paper first aims to evaluate performances of Capsule Network and the CNN-based equivalent model for the signature identification task. This evaluation is done under two lower resolutions than is usual to understand whether texture patterns are still staying as informative as they usually are for both algorithms. While Capsule Network achieves 98,8% and 98,6 % accuracies for 64×64 and 32×32 input resolutions, respectively, CNN obtains 55,4% and 54,7% accuracies. The second aim of the paper is to generalize the capability of Capsule Network concerning the verification task. Through this evaluation, the capability of Capsule Network is shown to obtain better feature extraction and classification results compared to the CNN-based equivalent model for the verification task as well as the identification task.","PeriodicalId":262143,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Symposium on INnovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Offline Signature Identification and Verification Using Capsule Network\",\"authors\":\"Dilara Gumusbas, T. Yıldırım\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INISTA.2019.8778228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In offline signature identification and verification systems, hand -crafted feature extraction methods, such as local binary patterns, have recently been set aside for automatic feature extraction methods such as convolutional neural networks (CNN). Although these CNN-based algorithms often obtain satisfying results, they require either many samples to find the best data representations or pre-trained network weights. To obviate the necessity of many samples as well as pre-trained weights, Capsule Network has recently claimed to achieve the best data representation using only a limited amount of data. This network not only obtains many variations of limited input samples via affine transformations in the algorithm but also uses hierarchical layers to select the most informative features without losing the exact informational position of the others. It is from this point of view that this paper first aims to evaluate performances of Capsule Network and the CNN-based equivalent model for the signature identification task. This evaluation is done under two lower resolutions than is usual to understand whether texture patterns are still staying as informative as they usually are for both algorithms. While Capsule Network achieves 98,8% and 98,6 % accuracies for 64×64 and 32×32 input resolutions, respectively, CNN obtains 55,4% and 54,7% accuracies. The second aim of the paper is to generalize the capability of Capsule Network concerning the verification task. Through this evaluation, the capability of Capsule Network is shown to obtain better feature extraction and classification results compared to the CNN-based equivalent model for the verification task as well as the identification task.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE International Symposium on INnovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA)\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE International Symposium on INnovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INISTA.2019.8778228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Symposium on INnovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INISTA.2019.8778228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

在离线签名识别和验证系统中,手工特征提取方法(如局部二进制模式)最近已被卷积神经网络(CNN)等自动特征提取方法所取代。虽然这些基于cnn的算法通常会获得令人满意的结果,但它们要么需要大量的样本来找到最佳的数据表示,要么需要预先训练好的网络权重。为了避免大量样本和预训练权重的必要性,Capsule Network最近声称仅使用有限数量的数据就能实现最佳的数据表示。该网络不仅通过算法中的仿射变换获得有限输入样本的许多变化,而且在不丢失其他特征的确切信息位置的情况下,利用分层层选择信息量最大的特征。正是从这个角度出发,本文首先旨在评估胶囊网络和基于cnn的等效模型在签名识别任务中的性能。这个评估是在两个比通常更低的分辨率下完成的,以了解纹理模式是否仍然像它们通常对两种算法一样保持信息。Capsule Network在64×64和32×32输入分辨率下的准确率分别为98.8%和98.6%,而CNN的准确率分别为55.4%和54.7%。本文的第二个目的是概括胶囊网络在验证任务方面的能力。通过评价,在验证任务和识别任务上,与基于cnn的等效模型相比,Capsule Network能够获得更好的特征提取和分类结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Offline Signature Identification and Verification Using Capsule Network
In offline signature identification and verification systems, hand -crafted feature extraction methods, such as local binary patterns, have recently been set aside for automatic feature extraction methods such as convolutional neural networks (CNN). Although these CNN-based algorithms often obtain satisfying results, they require either many samples to find the best data representations or pre-trained network weights. To obviate the necessity of many samples as well as pre-trained weights, Capsule Network has recently claimed to achieve the best data representation using only a limited amount of data. This network not only obtains many variations of limited input samples via affine transformations in the algorithm but also uses hierarchical layers to select the most informative features without losing the exact informational position of the others. It is from this point of view that this paper first aims to evaluate performances of Capsule Network and the CNN-based equivalent model for the signature identification task. This evaluation is done under two lower resolutions than is usual to understand whether texture patterns are still staying as informative as they usually are for both algorithms. While Capsule Network achieves 98,8% and 98,6 % accuracies for 64×64 and 32×32 input resolutions, respectively, CNN obtains 55,4% and 54,7% accuracies. The second aim of the paper is to generalize the capability of Capsule Network concerning the verification task. Through this evaluation, the capability of Capsule Network is shown to obtain better feature extraction and classification results compared to the CNN-based equivalent model for the verification task as well as the identification task.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信