“警示,改变”:破解文化记忆的叙事与兰金,伊迪和菲利普

J. Shook
{"title":"“警示,改变”:破解文化记忆的叙事与兰金,伊迪和菲利普","authors":"J. Shook","doi":"10.17077/2168-569X.1428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Poet Harryette Mullen connects the long literary tradition of reference and recycling with more recent versions of \"remix\" culture in her Recyclopedia, arguing that \"poetry... remakes and renews words and images, ideas, transforming surplus cultural information into something unexpected,\" even \"salvages and finds imaginative uses for knowledge,\" a generative re-creation that finds not only new art but also new horizons for the human (Mullen vii). Writers have long found power within historical material, and long leaned upon their audiences' collective knowledge of the past in order to enter and amend cultural memory.1As information theory joins literary and cultural criticism, new vocabularies emerge that can expand our understandings of poetry's aesthetic and ethical potentials for meeting the past and for constructing the future. Looking at poetic projects as \"hacks\" in the dataset of cultural memory changes our understanding of narrative to a technology that can proliferate alternatives, rather than ossifying a dominant paradigm. If we visualize the ideas recycled through poetry as information flow, then a \"hack\" can serve as a productive metaphor for generative intervention. Traditionally, \"hacking\" refers to interference in computer networks. McKenzie Wark, however, recuperates the word from its teen basement computer geek prankster image in A Hacker Manifesto. In Wark's hands, \"hack\" becomes an action applicable to any creative act, metaphorized as tapping into the flow of power or diverting restricted information into avenues of greater access.2 While production merely copies, a hack differentiates (Wark paragraph 160). For Wark \"to hack is to release the virtual from the actual\" (Wark paragraph 74). Wark's interest lies in the value of hacking itself, but I propose a more targeted use of the idea: to hack is to break apart collective memory's seemingly fixed narratives, allowing multiple stories to emerge into actual life.Claudia Rankine, Cornelius Eady, and M. NourbeSe Philip further this expansion of social memory, and their formally demanding hacks may be usefully read with N. Katherine Hayles' formulations of database and narrative. For Hayles the technologies of narrative and database/dataset function symbiotically; applying her vocabulary allows a vision of cultural memory as a malleable dataset holding exponentially more possible narratives than normally visible.Such notions of information offer a structure for reading authors who insist that the past is never truly past, never complete, and never contained in one telling. Strategically applying the computer programming term \"database,\" or more accurately here \"dataset,\" allows a continuation of Eric Havelock's and Rachel Blau DuPlessis' interventions in the archives of memory and culture. After all, a dataset \"is not a stable archive but a constantly shifting set of relationships\" (KochnarLindgren 136). Artworks that call attention to their own construction, as Rankine's, Eady's, and Philip's do, also point to the data assembly of culture itself. Hacks must expose that \"what is represented as being real is always partial, limited, perhaps even false\" (Wark paragraph 74). So while narrative masquerades as fixed-the only possible story to be told, the only possible arrangement of parts-in reality the pieces of a dataset may be organized and read in any number of ways, telling any number of stories and voicing any number of perspectives and characters. Hayles' materiality attention also counters Wark's virtuality obsession, so that both may be marshaled in the reading of poetry and performance, theoretical incursions upon time with real-world resonances.Claudia Rankine's Don t Let Me Be Lonely: An American Lyric pries open the seemingly fixed narrative of American memory through the staging of a constructed subjectivity. Cornelius Eady's drama Brutal Imagination invites history's hidden specters into public view, directly confronting the fissures exposed by Rankine's (anti)-lyric. …","PeriodicalId":448595,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"What Alerts, Alters\\\": Hacking the Narratives of Cultural Memory with Rankine, Eady, and Philip\",\"authors\":\"J. Shook\",\"doi\":\"10.17077/2168-569X.1428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Poet Harryette Mullen connects the long literary tradition of reference and recycling with more recent versions of \\\"remix\\\" culture in her Recyclopedia, arguing that \\\"poetry... remakes and renews words and images, ideas, transforming surplus cultural information into something unexpected,\\\" even \\\"salvages and finds imaginative uses for knowledge,\\\" a generative re-creation that finds not only new art but also new horizons for the human (Mullen vii). Writers have long found power within historical material, and long leaned upon their audiences' collective knowledge of the past in order to enter and amend cultural memory.1As information theory joins literary and cultural criticism, new vocabularies emerge that can expand our understandings of poetry's aesthetic and ethical potentials for meeting the past and for constructing the future. Looking at poetic projects as \\\"hacks\\\" in the dataset of cultural memory changes our understanding of narrative to a technology that can proliferate alternatives, rather than ossifying a dominant paradigm. If we visualize the ideas recycled through poetry as information flow, then a \\\"hack\\\" can serve as a productive metaphor for generative intervention. Traditionally, \\\"hacking\\\" refers to interference in computer networks. McKenzie Wark, however, recuperates the word from its teen basement computer geek prankster image in A Hacker Manifesto. In Wark's hands, \\\"hack\\\" becomes an action applicable to any creative act, metaphorized as tapping into the flow of power or diverting restricted information into avenues of greater access.2 While production merely copies, a hack differentiates (Wark paragraph 160). For Wark \\\"to hack is to release the virtual from the actual\\\" (Wark paragraph 74). Wark's interest lies in the value of hacking itself, but I propose a more targeted use of the idea: to hack is to break apart collective memory's seemingly fixed narratives, allowing multiple stories to emerge into actual life.Claudia Rankine, Cornelius Eady, and M. NourbeSe Philip further this expansion of social memory, and their formally demanding hacks may be usefully read with N. Katherine Hayles' formulations of database and narrative. For Hayles the technologies of narrative and database/dataset function symbiotically; applying her vocabulary allows a vision of cultural memory as a malleable dataset holding exponentially more possible narratives than normally visible.Such notions of information offer a structure for reading authors who insist that the past is never truly past, never complete, and never contained in one telling. Strategically applying the computer programming term \\\"database,\\\" or more accurately here \\\"dataset,\\\" allows a continuation of Eric Havelock's and Rachel Blau DuPlessis' interventions in the archives of memory and culture. After all, a dataset \\\"is not a stable archive but a constantly shifting set of relationships\\\" (KochnarLindgren 136). Artworks that call attention to their own construction, as Rankine's, Eady's, and Philip's do, also point to the data assembly of culture itself. Hacks must expose that \\\"what is represented as being real is always partial, limited, perhaps even false\\\" (Wark paragraph 74). So while narrative masquerades as fixed-the only possible story to be told, the only possible arrangement of parts-in reality the pieces of a dataset may be organized and read in any number of ways, telling any number of stories and voicing any number of perspectives and characters. Hayles' materiality attention also counters Wark's virtuality obsession, so that both may be marshaled in the reading of poetry and performance, theoretical incursions upon time with real-world resonances.Claudia Rankine's Don t Let Me Be Lonely: An American Lyric pries open the seemingly fixed narrative of American memory through the staging of a constructed subjectivity. Cornelius Eady's drama Brutal Imagination invites history's hidden specters into public view, directly confronting the fissures exposed by Rankine's (anti)-lyric. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":448595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17077/2168-569X.1428\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17077/2168-569X.1428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

诗人哈里耶特·马伦在她的《循环百科全书》中,将参考和循环的悠久文学传统与最近版本的“混合”文化联系起来,认为“诗歌……重新制作和更新文字、图像、思想,将过剩的文化信息转化为意想不到的东西,“甚至”挽救和发现知识的想象性用途,“一种生成式的再创造,不仅为人类找到了新的艺术,也为人类找到了新的视野(马伦七)。作家们长期以来一直在历史材料中找到力量,并长期依赖于他们的观众对过去的集体知识,以进入和修正文化记忆。随着信息理论与文学和文化批评的结合,新的词汇出现了,这些词汇可以扩展我们对诗歌的审美和伦理潜力的理解,以满足过去和构建未来。将诗歌项目视为文化记忆数据集中的“黑客”,改变了我们对叙事的理解,使其成为一种可以增殖替代方案的技术,而不是僵化主导范式。如果我们把通过诗歌循环的思想想象成信息流,那么“黑客”就可以作为生产性干预的一个富有成效的隐喻。传统上,“黑客”指的是对计算机网络的干扰。然而,麦肯齐·沃克(McKenzie Wark)从《黑客宣言》(A Hacker Manifesto)中十几岁的地下室电脑极客恶作剧形象中恢复了这个词。在沃克的笔下,“黑客”变成了一种适用于任何创造性行为的行为,隐喻为利用权力的流动,或将受限制的信息转移到更容易获得的途径而生产只是复制,黑客区分(Wark第160段)。对沃克来说,“黑客就是将虚拟从现实中释放出来”(沃克第74段)。沃克的兴趣在于黑客行为本身的价值,但我提出了一个更有针对性的想法:黑客行为就是打破集体记忆中看似固定的叙事,让多个故事出现在现实生活中。克劳迪娅·兰金、科尼利厄斯·伊迪和诺贝斯·菲利普进一步扩展了社会记忆,他们的正式要求可以用n·凯瑟琳·海尔斯关于数据库和叙事的构想来解读。在Hayles看来,叙事技术与数据库/数据集功能是共生的;运用她的词汇,可以将文化记忆视为一个可延展的数据集,其中包含比通常情况下更多的可能叙事。这些信息概念为那些坚持认为过去从未真正过去、从未完整、从未包含在一次叙述中的阅读作者提供了一种结构。策略性地使用计算机编程术语“数据库”,或者更准确地说是“数据集”,可以延续埃里克·哈夫洛克和雷切尔·布劳·杜普莱西斯对记忆和文化档案的干预。毕竟,数据集“不是一个稳定的档案,而是一组不断变化的关系”(KochnarLindgren 136)。像Rankine, Eady和Philip的作品一样,唤起人们对自身结构的关注的艺术作品也指向了文化本身的数据集合。黑客必须揭露“被描绘为真实的东西总是部分的、有限的,甚至可能是错误的”(Wark第74段)。因此,虽然叙事伪装成固定的——唯一可能被讲述的故事,唯一可能的部分安排——但实际上,数据集的片段可能以任何方式被组织和阅读,讲述任何数量的故事,表达任何数量的观点和角色。海尔斯对物质的关注也对抗了沃克对虚拟的痴迷,所以两者都可以在诗歌和表演的阅读中被整理出来,理论入侵与现实世界的共鸣。克劳迪娅·兰金的《别让我孤独:一首美国抒情诗》通过一种建构的主体性舞台,揭开了美国记忆中看似固定的叙事。科尼利厄斯·伊迪的戏剧《残酷的想象》将历史中隐藏的幽灵引入公众视野,直接面对兰金(反)抒情所暴露的裂缝。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"What Alerts, Alters": Hacking the Narratives of Cultural Memory with Rankine, Eady, and Philip
Poet Harryette Mullen connects the long literary tradition of reference and recycling with more recent versions of "remix" culture in her Recyclopedia, arguing that "poetry... remakes and renews words and images, ideas, transforming surplus cultural information into something unexpected," even "salvages and finds imaginative uses for knowledge," a generative re-creation that finds not only new art but also new horizons for the human (Mullen vii). Writers have long found power within historical material, and long leaned upon their audiences' collective knowledge of the past in order to enter and amend cultural memory.1As information theory joins literary and cultural criticism, new vocabularies emerge that can expand our understandings of poetry's aesthetic and ethical potentials for meeting the past and for constructing the future. Looking at poetic projects as "hacks" in the dataset of cultural memory changes our understanding of narrative to a technology that can proliferate alternatives, rather than ossifying a dominant paradigm. If we visualize the ideas recycled through poetry as information flow, then a "hack" can serve as a productive metaphor for generative intervention. Traditionally, "hacking" refers to interference in computer networks. McKenzie Wark, however, recuperates the word from its teen basement computer geek prankster image in A Hacker Manifesto. In Wark's hands, "hack" becomes an action applicable to any creative act, metaphorized as tapping into the flow of power or diverting restricted information into avenues of greater access.2 While production merely copies, a hack differentiates (Wark paragraph 160). For Wark "to hack is to release the virtual from the actual" (Wark paragraph 74). Wark's interest lies in the value of hacking itself, but I propose a more targeted use of the idea: to hack is to break apart collective memory's seemingly fixed narratives, allowing multiple stories to emerge into actual life.Claudia Rankine, Cornelius Eady, and M. NourbeSe Philip further this expansion of social memory, and their formally demanding hacks may be usefully read with N. Katherine Hayles' formulations of database and narrative. For Hayles the technologies of narrative and database/dataset function symbiotically; applying her vocabulary allows a vision of cultural memory as a malleable dataset holding exponentially more possible narratives than normally visible.Such notions of information offer a structure for reading authors who insist that the past is never truly past, never complete, and never contained in one telling. Strategically applying the computer programming term "database," or more accurately here "dataset," allows a continuation of Eric Havelock's and Rachel Blau DuPlessis' interventions in the archives of memory and culture. After all, a dataset "is not a stable archive but a constantly shifting set of relationships" (KochnarLindgren 136). Artworks that call attention to their own construction, as Rankine's, Eady's, and Philip's do, also point to the data assembly of culture itself. Hacks must expose that "what is represented as being real is always partial, limited, perhaps even false" (Wark paragraph 74). So while narrative masquerades as fixed-the only possible story to be told, the only possible arrangement of parts-in reality the pieces of a dataset may be organized and read in any number of ways, telling any number of stories and voicing any number of perspectives and characters. Hayles' materiality attention also counters Wark's virtuality obsession, so that both may be marshaled in the reading of poetry and performance, theoretical incursions upon time with real-world resonances.Claudia Rankine's Don t Let Me Be Lonely: An American Lyric pries open the seemingly fixed narrative of American memory through the staging of a constructed subjectivity. Cornelius Eady's drama Brutal Imagination invites history's hidden specters into public view, directly confronting the fissures exposed by Rankine's (anti)-lyric. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信