Kanzi还是不能?

H. Lyn
{"title":"Kanzi还是不能?","authors":"H. Lyn","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198813781.013.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nonhuman animals have been successful in using a number of language abilities through a series of studies initiating from the late 1960s. However, these studies and the researchers faced intense criticism, which resulted in a vicious backlash that almost destroyed the field. In this chapter, the author will review the most frequent criticisms, any data-driven responses, and discuss the validity of each criticism. Ultimately, the findings show that nonhumans can acquire symbols through mechanisms more complex than simple association, that those symbols are referential in nature, they can use those symbols in appropriate contexts, and that their symbolic use is not explained by imitation. Some species have also been shown to use and/or comprehend rule-based ordering systems, but these stop short of true syntactical competence. Given the continuities revealed by these studies, any complete hypothesis regarding the evolution of language must incorporate these findings.","PeriodicalId":410083,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Human Symbolic Evolution","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kanzi or can’t he?\",\"authors\":\"H. Lyn\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198813781.013.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nonhuman animals have been successful in using a number of language abilities through a series of studies initiating from the late 1960s. However, these studies and the researchers faced intense criticism, which resulted in a vicious backlash that almost destroyed the field. In this chapter, the author will review the most frequent criticisms, any data-driven responses, and discuss the validity of each criticism. Ultimately, the findings show that nonhumans can acquire symbols through mechanisms more complex than simple association, that those symbols are referential in nature, they can use those symbols in appropriate contexts, and that their symbolic use is not explained by imitation. Some species have also been shown to use and/or comprehend rule-based ordering systems, but these stop short of true syntactical competence. Given the continuities revealed by these studies, any complete hypothesis regarding the evolution of language must incorporate these findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":410083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Human Symbolic Evolution\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Human Symbolic Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198813781.013.28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Human Symbolic Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198813781.013.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从20世纪60年代末开始的一系列研究表明,非人类动物已经成功地使用了许多语言能力。然而,这些研究和研究人员面临着激烈的批评,这导致了一场几乎摧毁了这个领域的恶性反弹。在本章中,作者将回顾最常见的批评,任何数据驱动的回应,并讨论每个批评的有效性。最终,研究结果表明,非人类可以通过比简单联想更复杂的机制获得符号,这些符号本质上是指涉性的,他们可以在适当的环境中使用这些符号,并且它们的符号使用不能用模仿来解释。一些物种也显示出使用和/或理解基于规则的排序系统,但这些都没有真正的句法能力。鉴于这些研究揭示的连续性,任何关于语言进化的完整假设都必须包含这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kanzi or can’t he?
Nonhuman animals have been successful in using a number of language abilities through a series of studies initiating from the late 1960s. However, these studies and the researchers faced intense criticism, which resulted in a vicious backlash that almost destroyed the field. In this chapter, the author will review the most frequent criticisms, any data-driven responses, and discuss the validity of each criticism. Ultimately, the findings show that nonhumans can acquire symbols through mechanisms more complex than simple association, that those symbols are referential in nature, they can use those symbols in appropriate contexts, and that their symbolic use is not explained by imitation. Some species have also been shown to use and/or comprehend rule-based ordering systems, but these stop short of true syntactical competence. Given the continuities revealed by these studies, any complete hypothesis regarding the evolution of language must incorporate these findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信