学习策略:心理学本科生和硕士学生学习年份的差异/学习策略:心理学本科生和硕士学生学习年份的差异

A. Aizpurua
{"title":"学习策略:心理学本科生和硕士学生学习年份的差异/学习策略:心理学本科生和硕士学生学习年份的差异","authors":"A. Aizpurua","doi":"10.1080/11356405.2016.1269500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The strategies used by students are an important element of the teaching/learning process. The CEVEAPEU Questionnaire was administered to 310 students to analyse the use of 25 learning strategies in undergraduate psychology students and students of a Master’s in Education, and to explore any differences according to their year of study. Greater use of strategies was reported in the advanced years in comparison with the initial years, with the exception of strategies related to social skills and the transfer of knowledge, which were particularly notable in the third year in comparison with other years. Furthermore, no changes were noted between students of the first year and the second year, or between those of the third year and the fourth year. These findings indicate that the strategic profile of university students varies according to the academic year they are following and that, in general, it is better in the middle and advanced stages. This aspect should therefore be taken into account in order to improve the quality of teaching/learning processes in higher education.","PeriodicalId":153832,"journal":{"name":"Cultura y Educación","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning strategies: differences according to year of study in undergraduate psychology students and Master’s students / Estrategias de aprendizaje: diferencias por curso académico en estudiantes universitarios de psicología y máster\",\"authors\":\"A. Aizpurua\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/11356405.2016.1269500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The strategies used by students are an important element of the teaching/learning process. The CEVEAPEU Questionnaire was administered to 310 students to analyse the use of 25 learning strategies in undergraduate psychology students and students of a Master’s in Education, and to explore any differences according to their year of study. Greater use of strategies was reported in the advanced years in comparison with the initial years, with the exception of strategies related to social skills and the transfer of knowledge, which were particularly notable in the third year in comparison with other years. Furthermore, no changes were noted between students of the first year and the second year, or between those of the third year and the fourth year. These findings indicate that the strategic profile of university students varies according to the academic year they are following and that, in general, it is better in the middle and advanced stages. This aspect should therefore be taken into account in order to improve the quality of teaching/learning processes in higher education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultura y Educación\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultura y Educación\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2016.1269500\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultura y Educación","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2016.1269500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

学生使用的策略是教学过程的重要组成部分。CEVEAPEU问卷对310名学生进行了调查,分析了心理学本科学生和教育学硕士学生在25种学习策略的使用情况,并根据他们的学习年限探讨了它们之间的差异。据报道,与最初几年相比,在高年级使用的策略更多,但与社交技能和知识转移有关的策略除外,与其他年份相比,这在第三年尤为显著。此外,第一年和第二年的学生之间,或者第三年和第四年的学生之间没有发现任何变化。这些研究结果表明,大学生的战略概况根据他们所遵循的学年而有所不同,总体而言,中高级阶段的战略概况更好。因此,为了提高高等教育教学过程的质量,应该考虑到这一方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning strategies: differences according to year of study in undergraduate psychology students and Master’s students / Estrategias de aprendizaje: diferencias por curso académico en estudiantes universitarios de psicología y máster
Abstract The strategies used by students are an important element of the teaching/learning process. The CEVEAPEU Questionnaire was administered to 310 students to analyse the use of 25 learning strategies in undergraduate psychology students and students of a Master’s in Education, and to explore any differences according to their year of study. Greater use of strategies was reported in the advanced years in comparison with the initial years, with the exception of strategies related to social skills and the transfer of knowledge, which were particularly notable in the third year in comparison with other years. Furthermore, no changes were noted between students of the first year and the second year, or between those of the third year and the fourth year. These findings indicate that the strategic profile of university students varies according to the academic year they are following and that, in general, it is better in the middle and advanced stages. This aspect should therefore be taken into account in order to improve the quality of teaching/learning processes in higher education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信