两种再压缩方式治疗实验性脑空气栓塞的比较。

Undersea biomedical research Pub Date : 1992-05-01
J J McDermott, A J Dutka, W A Koller, R R Pearson, E T Flynn
{"title":"两种再压缩方式治疗实验性脑空气栓塞的比较。","authors":"J J McDermott,&nbsp;A J Dutka,&nbsp;W A Koller,&nbsp;R R Pearson,&nbsp;E T Flynn","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The standard treatment for cerebral arterial gas embolism (CAGE) is an initial recompression to 6 atm abs on air for 30 min followed by oxygen breathing at 2.8 and 1.9 atm abs. It has been suggested that initial recompression to 2.8 atm abs on O2 may be as beneficial, thus avoiding potential treatment complications associated with the deeper depth. To test this hypothesis, we measured the recovery of the somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) following air embolism in anesthetized, ventilated cats. Air was infused into the carotid artery in increments of 0.08 ml until the SEP amplitude was reduced to less than 10% of the baseline value for 15 min. Three groups were studied. A control group (n = 10) received no further treatment after SEP suppression. The second group (6 atm abs/HBO] (n = 8) was compressed to 6 atm abs on air for 30 min followed by O2 breathing at 2.8 atm abs for 100 min. The third group (HBO) (n = 8) was compressed to 2.8 atm abs on O2 for 130 min. The control group recovered 28.8 +/- 18.2% (mean +/- SD) of the baseline amplitude, whereas the 6 atm abs/HBO group recovered 48.6 +/- 22.6%, and the HBO group recovered 62.0 +/- 20.3%. An analysis of variance revealed that only the HBO group had significantly (P less than 0.01) better recovery than the control group. There was no significant difference in SEP recovery between the 2 treatment groups. These results suggest that treating CAGE at 2.8 atm abs with O2 is a viable alternative to the current therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":76778,"journal":{"name":"Undersea biomedical research","volume":"19 3","pages":"171-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of two recompression profiles in treating experimental cerebral air embolism.\",\"authors\":\"J J McDermott,&nbsp;A J Dutka,&nbsp;W A Koller,&nbsp;R R Pearson,&nbsp;E T Flynn\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The standard treatment for cerebral arterial gas embolism (CAGE) is an initial recompression to 6 atm abs on air for 30 min followed by oxygen breathing at 2.8 and 1.9 atm abs. It has been suggested that initial recompression to 2.8 atm abs on O2 may be as beneficial, thus avoiding potential treatment complications associated with the deeper depth. To test this hypothesis, we measured the recovery of the somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) following air embolism in anesthetized, ventilated cats. Air was infused into the carotid artery in increments of 0.08 ml until the SEP amplitude was reduced to less than 10% of the baseline value for 15 min. Three groups were studied. A control group (n = 10) received no further treatment after SEP suppression. The second group (6 atm abs/HBO] (n = 8) was compressed to 6 atm abs on air for 30 min followed by O2 breathing at 2.8 atm abs for 100 min. The third group (HBO) (n = 8) was compressed to 2.8 atm abs on O2 for 130 min. The control group recovered 28.8 +/- 18.2% (mean +/- SD) of the baseline amplitude, whereas the 6 atm abs/HBO group recovered 48.6 +/- 22.6%, and the HBO group recovered 62.0 +/- 20.3%. An analysis of variance revealed that only the HBO group had significantly (P less than 0.01) better recovery than the control group. There was no significant difference in SEP recovery between the 2 treatment groups. These results suggest that treating CAGE at 2.8 atm abs with O2 is a viable alternative to the current therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Undersea biomedical research\",\"volume\":\"19 3\",\"pages\":\"171-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Undersea biomedical research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Undersea biomedical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脑动脉气体栓塞(CAGE)的标准治疗是在空气中初始再压缩至6atm腹肌30分钟,然后在2.8和1.9 atm腹肌的氧气呼吸。有研究表明,在氧气下初始再压缩至2.8 atm腹肌可能是有益的,从而避免了与更深深度相关的潜在治疗并发症。为了验证这一假设,我们测量了麻醉、通气的猫在空气栓塞后的体感诱发电位(SEP)的恢复情况。以0.08 ml的增量向颈动脉内注入空气,直至SEP振幅降至基线值的10%以下,持续15 min。对照组(n = 10)经SEP抑制后不再治疗。第二组(6 atm abs / HBO] (n = 8)被压缩到6 atm abs为30分钟紧随其后的是空气氧气呼吸在100分钟2.8 atm abs。第三组(HBO) (n = 8)被压缩为130分钟2.8 atm abs O2。对照组恢复28.8 + / - 18.2%(平均+ / - SD)的基线振幅,而6 atm abs / HBO组恢复48.6 + / - 22.6%,和HBO组恢复62.0 + / - 20.3%。方差分析显示,只有高压氧治疗组的恢复明显优于对照组(P < 0.01)。两组间SEP恢复无显著差异。这些结果表明,在2.8 atm腹肌用O2治疗CAGE是目前治疗的可行替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of two recompression profiles in treating experimental cerebral air embolism.

The standard treatment for cerebral arterial gas embolism (CAGE) is an initial recompression to 6 atm abs on air for 30 min followed by oxygen breathing at 2.8 and 1.9 atm abs. It has been suggested that initial recompression to 2.8 atm abs on O2 may be as beneficial, thus avoiding potential treatment complications associated with the deeper depth. To test this hypothesis, we measured the recovery of the somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) following air embolism in anesthetized, ventilated cats. Air was infused into the carotid artery in increments of 0.08 ml until the SEP amplitude was reduced to less than 10% of the baseline value for 15 min. Three groups were studied. A control group (n = 10) received no further treatment after SEP suppression. The second group (6 atm abs/HBO] (n = 8) was compressed to 6 atm abs on air for 30 min followed by O2 breathing at 2.8 atm abs for 100 min. The third group (HBO) (n = 8) was compressed to 2.8 atm abs on O2 for 130 min. The control group recovered 28.8 +/- 18.2% (mean +/- SD) of the baseline amplitude, whereas the 6 atm abs/HBO group recovered 48.6 +/- 22.6%, and the HBO group recovered 62.0 +/- 20.3%. An analysis of variance revealed that only the HBO group had significantly (P less than 0.01) better recovery than the control group. There was no significant difference in SEP recovery between the 2 treatment groups. These results suggest that treating CAGE at 2.8 atm abs with O2 is a viable alternative to the current therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信