Ziyou Xiong, R. Radhakrishnan, Ajay Divakaran, Thomas S. Huang
{"title":"比较MFCC和MPEG-7音频特征提取、最大似然HMM和熵先验HMM对运动音频分类的影响","authors":"Ziyou Xiong, R. Radhakrishnan, Ajay Divakaran, Thomas S. Huang","doi":"10.1109/ICASSP.2003.1200048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a comparison of 6 methods for classification of sports audio. For feature extraction, we have two choices: MPEG-7 audio features and Mel-scale frequency cepstrum coefficients (MFCC). For classification, we also have two choices: maximum likelihood hidden Markov models (ML-HMM) and entropic prior HMMs (EP-HMM). EP-HMMs, in turn, have two variations: with and without trimming of the model parameters. We thus have 6 possible methods, each of which corresponds to a combination. Our results show that all the combinations achieve classification accuracy of around 90% with the best and the second best being, respectively, MPEG-7 features with EP-HMM and MFCC with ML-HMM.","PeriodicalId":104473,"journal":{"name":"2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings. (ICASSP '03).","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing MFCC and MPEG-7 audio features for feature extraction, maximum likelihood HMM and entropic prior HMM for sports audio classification\",\"authors\":\"Ziyou Xiong, R. Radhakrishnan, Ajay Divakaran, Thomas S. Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICASSP.2003.1200048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present a comparison of 6 methods for classification of sports audio. For feature extraction, we have two choices: MPEG-7 audio features and Mel-scale frequency cepstrum coefficients (MFCC). For classification, we also have two choices: maximum likelihood hidden Markov models (ML-HMM) and entropic prior HMMs (EP-HMM). EP-HMMs, in turn, have two variations: with and without trimming of the model parameters. We thus have 6 possible methods, each of which corresponds to a combination. Our results show that all the combinations achieve classification accuracy of around 90% with the best and the second best being, respectively, MPEG-7 features with EP-HMM and MFCC with ML-HMM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":104473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings. (ICASSP '03).\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings. (ICASSP '03).\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2003.1200048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings. (ICASSP '03).","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2003.1200048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparing MFCC and MPEG-7 audio features for feature extraction, maximum likelihood HMM and entropic prior HMM for sports audio classification
We present a comparison of 6 methods for classification of sports audio. For feature extraction, we have two choices: MPEG-7 audio features and Mel-scale frequency cepstrum coefficients (MFCC). For classification, we also have two choices: maximum likelihood hidden Markov models (ML-HMM) and entropic prior HMMs (EP-HMM). EP-HMMs, in turn, have two variations: with and without trimming of the model parameters. We thus have 6 possible methods, each of which corresponds to a combination. Our results show that all the combinations achieve classification accuracy of around 90% with the best and the second best being, respectively, MPEG-7 features with EP-HMM and MFCC with ML-HMM.