Humphrey O. Obie, Waqar Hussain, Xin Xia, J. Grundy, Li Li, Burak Turhan, J. Whittle, Mojtaba Shahin
{"title":"A First Look at Human Values-Violation in App Reviews","authors":"Humphrey O. Obie, Waqar Hussain, Xin Xia, J. Grundy, Li Li, Burak Turhan, J. Whittle, Mojtaba Shahin","doi":"10.1109/ICSE-SEIS52602.2021.00012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ubiquitous technologies such as mobile software applications (mobile apps) have a tremendous influence on the evolution of the social, cultural, economic, and political facets of life in society. Mobile apps fulfil many practical purposes for users including entertainment, transportation, financial management, etc. Given the ubiquity of mobile apps in the lives of individuals and the consequent effect of these technologies on society, it is essential to consider the relationship between human values and the development and deployment of mobile apps. The many negative consequences of violating human values such as privacy, fairness or social justice by technology have been documented in recent times. If we can detect these violations in a timely manner, developers can look to better address them. To understand the violation of human values in a range of common mobile apps, we analysed 22,119 app reviews from Google Play Store using natural language processing techniques. We base our values violation detection approach on a widely accepted model of human values; the Schwartz theory of basic human values. The results of our analysis show that 26.5% of the reviews contained text indicating user perceived violations of human values. We found that benevolence and self-direction were the most violated value categories, and conformity and tradition were the least violated categories. Our results also highlight the need for a proactive approach to the alignment of values amongst stakeholders and the use of app reviews as a valuable additional source for mining values requirements.","PeriodicalId":441365,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society (ICSE-SEIS)","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society (ICSE-SEIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEIS52602.2021.00012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

无处不在的技术,如移动软件应用程序(移动应用程序)对社会生活的社会、文化、经济和政治方面的演变产生了巨大的影响。移动应用程序为用户实现了许多实际目的,包括娱乐、交通、财务管理等。鉴于移动应用程序在个人生活中无处不在,以及这些技术对社会的影响,有必要考虑人类价值观与移动应用程序的开发和部署之间的关系。近年来,技术侵犯隐私、公平或社会正义等人类价值观的许多负面后果已被记录在案。如果我们能够及时发现这些违规行为,开发人员就可以更好地解决它们。为了理解一系列常见手机应用中违反人类价值观的行为,我们使用自然语言处理技术分析了来自Google Play Store的22119条应用评论。我们的价值观违规检测方法基于一个被广泛接受的人类价值观模型;施瓦茨关于人类基本价值的理论我们的分析结果显示,26.5%的评论包含了表明用户认为违反人类价值观的文本。我们发现仁爱和自我导向是最被违背的价值范畴,顺从和传统是最不被违背的价值范畴。我们的研究结果还强调,需要采取积极主动的方法来协调利益相关者之间的价值观,并使用应用程序评论作为挖掘价值需求的有价值的额外来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A First Look at Human Values-Violation in App Reviews
Ubiquitous technologies such as mobile software applications (mobile apps) have a tremendous influence on the evolution of the social, cultural, economic, and political facets of life in society. Mobile apps fulfil many practical purposes for users including entertainment, transportation, financial management, etc. Given the ubiquity of mobile apps in the lives of individuals and the consequent effect of these technologies on society, it is essential to consider the relationship between human values and the development and deployment of mobile apps. The many negative consequences of violating human values such as privacy, fairness or social justice by technology have been documented in recent times. If we can detect these violations in a timely manner, developers can look to better address them. To understand the violation of human values in a range of common mobile apps, we analysed 22,119 app reviews from Google Play Store using natural language processing techniques. We base our values violation detection approach on a widely accepted model of human values; the Schwartz theory of basic human values. The results of our analysis show that 26.5% of the reviews contained text indicating user perceived violations of human values. We found that benevolence and self-direction were the most violated value categories, and conformity and tradition were the least violated categories. Our results also highlight the need for a proactive approach to the alignment of values amongst stakeholders and the use of app reviews as a valuable additional source for mining values requirements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信