储层流体物性预测的随机森林集合模型

Y. Adeeyo
{"title":"储层流体物性预测的随机森林集合模型","authors":"Y. Adeeyo","doi":"10.2118/212044-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Reservoir fluid PVT properties are measured in the laboratory for various use in reservoir engineering evaluation and estimation. Despite the indispensability of these PVT parameters, PVT lab data are seldomly available and if available may be unreliable. Instead, various empirical models have been developed and used in the industry. These empirical models are inherently inaccurate when used to predict PVT properties of fluid from different geological region with different depositional environment and fingerprint. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has evolved over the years and provided some algorithms with potentials to develop accurate predictive model for the prediction of bubblepoint pressure.\n This work tested some AI algorithms, compared performances and choose random forest regression algorithm in developing a robust predictive model for the estimation of bubblepoint pressure.\n Two thousand five hundred and twenty-two datasets obtained from oil reservoirs in different geographical locations were used for the feature scaling of input data, training and testing of the models. The independent variables, gas-oil ratio, temperature, oil density and gas density were confirmed to have key influence on the dependent variable Bubblepoint pressure\n The random forest model developed uses ensemble learning approach, combines predictions from multiple machine learning algorithms by averaging all predictions to make a more accurate prediction. The ‘forest’ generated by the random forest algorithm was trained through bootstrap aggregating. This is an ensemble meta-algorithm that improves the accuracy of machine learning algorithms. Percentage data split was 70% training and 30% testing.\n The reliability, accuracy and completeness of the predictive model capability were computed through performance indices such as the root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). The best network architecture was determined along with the corresponding test set RMSE, and Correlation coefficient.\n Statistical and graphical error analysis of the results showed that the random forest model performed better than existing models with 0.98 correlation coefficients for bubblepoint pressure. Better accuracy of reservoir properties prediction could be achieved using this random forest reservoir fluid properties prediction model.","PeriodicalId":399294,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, August 02, 2022","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Random Forest Ensemble Model for Reservoir Fluid Property Prediction\",\"authors\":\"Y. Adeeyo\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/212044-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Reservoir fluid PVT properties are measured in the laboratory for various use in reservoir engineering evaluation and estimation. Despite the indispensability of these PVT parameters, PVT lab data are seldomly available and if available may be unreliable. Instead, various empirical models have been developed and used in the industry. These empirical models are inherently inaccurate when used to predict PVT properties of fluid from different geological region with different depositional environment and fingerprint. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has evolved over the years and provided some algorithms with potentials to develop accurate predictive model for the prediction of bubblepoint pressure.\\n This work tested some AI algorithms, compared performances and choose random forest regression algorithm in developing a robust predictive model for the estimation of bubblepoint pressure.\\n Two thousand five hundred and twenty-two datasets obtained from oil reservoirs in different geographical locations were used for the feature scaling of input data, training and testing of the models. The independent variables, gas-oil ratio, temperature, oil density and gas density were confirmed to have key influence on the dependent variable Bubblepoint pressure\\n The random forest model developed uses ensemble learning approach, combines predictions from multiple machine learning algorithms by averaging all predictions to make a more accurate prediction. The ‘forest’ generated by the random forest algorithm was trained through bootstrap aggregating. This is an ensemble meta-algorithm that improves the accuracy of machine learning algorithms. Percentage data split was 70% training and 30% testing.\\n The reliability, accuracy and completeness of the predictive model capability were computed through performance indices such as the root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). The best network architecture was determined along with the corresponding test set RMSE, and Correlation coefficient.\\n Statistical and graphical error analysis of the results showed that the random forest model performed better than existing models with 0.98 correlation coefficients for bubblepoint pressure. Better accuracy of reservoir properties prediction could be achieved using this random forest reservoir fluid properties prediction model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":399294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, August 02, 2022\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, August 02, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/212044-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, August 02, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212044-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

为了油藏工程评价和评价的各种用途,在实验室中测量了储层流体的PVT特性。尽管这些PVT参数是不可或缺的,但PVT实验室数据很少可用,即使可用也可能不可靠。相反,各种经验模型已经开发出来并在行业中使用。这些经验模型在预测不同地质区域、不同沉积环境和不同指纹的流体PVT性质时存在着固有的不准确性。人工智能(AI)经过多年的发展,提供了一些有潜力的算法来开发准确的气泡点压力预测模型。本文测试了一些人工智能算法,比较了它们的性能,并选择了随机森林回归算法来开发一个鲁棒的预测模型来估计气泡点压力。利用来自不同地理位置的2522个油藏数据集对输入数据进行特征缩放,并对模型进行训练和测试。自变量气油比、温度、油密度和气体密度对因变量气泡点压力有重要影响。建立的随机森林模型采用集成学习方法,将多种机器学习算法的预测结合起来,通过平均所有预测来进行更准确的预测。随机森林算法生成的“森林”通过自举聚合进行训练。这是一个集成元算法,提高了机器学习算法的准确性。百分比数据分割为70%训练和30%测试。通过均方根误差(RMSE)和平均绝对误差(MAE)等性能指标计算预测模型能力的可靠性、准确性和完整性。通过相应的测试集RMSE和相关系数确定了最佳网络架构。统计误差和图形误差分析结果表明,随机森林模型对气泡点压力的相关系数为0.98,优于现有模型。利用该随机森林储层流体物性预测模型可以获得较好的储层物性预测精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Random Forest Ensemble Model for Reservoir Fluid Property Prediction
Reservoir fluid PVT properties are measured in the laboratory for various use in reservoir engineering evaluation and estimation. Despite the indispensability of these PVT parameters, PVT lab data are seldomly available and if available may be unreliable. Instead, various empirical models have been developed and used in the industry. These empirical models are inherently inaccurate when used to predict PVT properties of fluid from different geological region with different depositional environment and fingerprint. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has evolved over the years and provided some algorithms with potentials to develop accurate predictive model for the prediction of bubblepoint pressure. This work tested some AI algorithms, compared performances and choose random forest regression algorithm in developing a robust predictive model for the estimation of bubblepoint pressure. Two thousand five hundred and twenty-two datasets obtained from oil reservoirs in different geographical locations were used for the feature scaling of input data, training and testing of the models. The independent variables, gas-oil ratio, temperature, oil density and gas density were confirmed to have key influence on the dependent variable Bubblepoint pressure The random forest model developed uses ensemble learning approach, combines predictions from multiple machine learning algorithms by averaging all predictions to make a more accurate prediction. The ‘forest’ generated by the random forest algorithm was trained through bootstrap aggregating. This is an ensemble meta-algorithm that improves the accuracy of machine learning algorithms. Percentage data split was 70% training and 30% testing. The reliability, accuracy and completeness of the predictive model capability were computed through performance indices such as the root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). The best network architecture was determined along with the corresponding test set RMSE, and Correlation coefficient. Statistical and graphical error analysis of the results showed that the random forest model performed better than existing models with 0.98 correlation coefficients for bubblepoint pressure. Better accuracy of reservoir properties prediction could be achieved using this random forest reservoir fluid properties prediction model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信