近红外光谱联合化学计量学测定乳状制剂中双氯芬酸二乙胺的含量

L. Wulandari, Karima Pratiwi, Y. Retnaningtyas
{"title":"近红外光谱联合化学计量学测定乳状制剂中双氯芬酸二乙胺的含量","authors":"L. Wulandari, Karima Pratiwi, Y. Retnaningtyas","doi":"10.21743/pjaec/2022.12.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diclofenac is an NSAID-class drug with activity as an analgesic and anti-inflammatory recommended for treating various acute and chronic pain conditions. One of the topical preparations of diclofenac that is often used is emulgel. In this study, diclofenac diethylamine levels in emulgel preparations were determined using NIR (Near-Infrared) spectroscopy and chemometric methods. Simulation samples were prepared and divided into 24 training sets and 9 test set samples. NIR spectra of training set samples were correlated with the concentration of diclofenac diethylamine using partial least squares (PLS), principal component regression (PCR), and support vector regression (SVR). The best model was validated using leave one out cross validation (LOOCV) and external validation using test set samples. The comparison method used in this study was the validated TLC Densitometry method. The best calibration model was PLS, with an R2 value of 0.990 and RMSE of 0.171. The results of R2 and RMSE of LOOCV were 0.989 up to 0.990 and 0.167 up to 0.178, respectively. The result of R2 and RMSEP external validation were 0.991 and 0.146, respectively. The precision and accuracy method showed RSD of 3.37% and a % recovery of 99.78%. The results of determining the sample levels obtained from NIR and TLC Densitometry methods tested with the Two-Paired Sample T Test and showed that the two methods have no significant differences with a significance value of more than 0.05.","PeriodicalId":169509,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Analytical and Environmental Chemistry","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of Diclofenac Diethylamine Levels in Emulgel Preparations Using NIR Spectroscopy Combined with Chemometrics\",\"authors\":\"L. Wulandari, Karima Pratiwi, Y. Retnaningtyas\",\"doi\":\"10.21743/pjaec/2022.12.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Diclofenac is an NSAID-class drug with activity as an analgesic and anti-inflammatory recommended for treating various acute and chronic pain conditions. One of the topical preparations of diclofenac that is often used is emulgel. In this study, diclofenac diethylamine levels in emulgel preparations were determined using NIR (Near-Infrared) spectroscopy and chemometric methods. Simulation samples were prepared and divided into 24 training sets and 9 test set samples. NIR spectra of training set samples were correlated with the concentration of diclofenac diethylamine using partial least squares (PLS), principal component regression (PCR), and support vector regression (SVR). The best model was validated using leave one out cross validation (LOOCV) and external validation using test set samples. The comparison method used in this study was the validated TLC Densitometry method. The best calibration model was PLS, with an R2 value of 0.990 and RMSE of 0.171. The results of R2 and RMSE of LOOCV were 0.989 up to 0.990 and 0.167 up to 0.178, respectively. The result of R2 and RMSEP external validation were 0.991 and 0.146, respectively. The precision and accuracy method showed RSD of 3.37% and a % recovery of 99.78%. The results of determining the sample levels obtained from NIR and TLC Densitometry methods tested with the Two-Paired Sample T Test and showed that the two methods have no significant differences with a significance value of more than 0.05.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Analytical and Environmental Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Analytical and Environmental Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21743/pjaec/2022.12.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Analytical and Environmental Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21743/pjaec/2022.12.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

双氯芬酸是一种具有镇痛和抗炎活性的非甾体抗炎药类药物,推荐用于治疗各种急性和慢性疼痛状况。双氯芬酸常用的外用制剂之一是乳凝胶。本研究采用近红外光谱和化学计量学方法测定了乳状制剂中双氯芬酸二乙胺的含量。拟备仿真样本,分为24个训练集和9个测试集样本。利用偏最小二乘法(PLS)、主成分回归(PCR)和支持向量回归(SVR)对训练集样品的近红外光谱与双氯芬酸二乙胺浓度进行相关性分析。使用留一交叉验证(LOOCV)和使用测试集样本的外部验证来验证最佳模型。本研究采用的比较方法为经验证的薄层色谱密度法。最佳的校正模型为PLS, R2为0.990,RMSE为0.171。LOOCV的R2和RMSE分别为0.989 ~ 0.990和0.167 ~ 0.178。R2和RMSEP外部验证结果分别为0.991和0.146。精密度和准确度的RSD为3.37%,回收率为99.78%。近红外法和薄层法测定样品水平的结果经双配对样本T检验,两种方法无显著性差异,显著性值均大于0.05。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determination of Diclofenac Diethylamine Levels in Emulgel Preparations Using NIR Spectroscopy Combined with Chemometrics
Diclofenac is an NSAID-class drug with activity as an analgesic and anti-inflammatory recommended for treating various acute and chronic pain conditions. One of the topical preparations of diclofenac that is often used is emulgel. In this study, diclofenac diethylamine levels in emulgel preparations were determined using NIR (Near-Infrared) spectroscopy and chemometric methods. Simulation samples were prepared and divided into 24 training sets and 9 test set samples. NIR spectra of training set samples were correlated with the concentration of diclofenac diethylamine using partial least squares (PLS), principal component regression (PCR), and support vector regression (SVR). The best model was validated using leave one out cross validation (LOOCV) and external validation using test set samples. The comparison method used in this study was the validated TLC Densitometry method. The best calibration model was PLS, with an R2 value of 0.990 and RMSE of 0.171. The results of R2 and RMSE of LOOCV were 0.989 up to 0.990 and 0.167 up to 0.178, respectively. The result of R2 and RMSEP external validation were 0.991 and 0.146, respectively. The precision and accuracy method showed RSD of 3.37% and a % recovery of 99.78%. The results of determining the sample levels obtained from NIR and TLC Densitometry methods tested with the Two-Paired Sample T Test and showed that the two methods have no significant differences with a significance value of more than 0.05.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信