证据的证据

Charles Muniak
{"title":"证据的证据","authors":"Charles Muniak","doi":"10.56094/jss.v56i3.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A few years ago, a colleague contacted me about a paper they were working on concerning the “evidence” they felt was needed to show that safety-critical software was indeed safe. I asked if there was any evidence that the long list of items they were developing had any proven efficacy for safety. That is, is there any evidence that the items actually reduce the risk of a mishap?","PeriodicalId":250838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of System Safety","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence for the Evidence\",\"authors\":\"Charles Muniak\",\"doi\":\"10.56094/jss.v56i3.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A few years ago, a colleague contacted me about a paper they were working on concerning the “evidence” they felt was needed to show that safety-critical software was indeed safe. I asked if there was any evidence that the long list of items they were developing had any proven efficacy for safety. That is, is there any evidence that the items actually reduce the risk of a mishap?\",\"PeriodicalId\":250838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of System Safety\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of System Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56094/jss.v56i3.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of System Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56094/jss.v56i3.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几年前,一位同事联系我,说他们正在写一篇论文,他们认为需要“证据”来证明安全关键型软件确实是安全的。我问他们,是否有证据表明,他们正在开发的那一长串产品有任何已证实的安全功效。也就是说,是否有证据表明这些物品确实降低了事故发生的风险?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidence for the Evidence
A few years ago, a colleague contacted me about a paper they were working on concerning the “evidence” they felt was needed to show that safety-critical software was indeed safe. I asked if there was any evidence that the long list of items they were developing had any proven efficacy for safety. That is, is there any evidence that the items actually reduce the risk of a mishap?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信