对伊斯兰教法筛选股票门槛的批判性审查

Batuhan Buğra Akartepe
{"title":"对伊斯兰教法筛选股票门槛的批判性审查","authors":"Batuhan Buğra Akartepe","doi":"10.54427/ijisef.1129328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Capital markets represent the second main application area of Islamic finance after the banking sector. The most important instrument traded in these markets is stocks. The character of companies is important on the legitimacy (shariah compliance) of investing in stocks. The fact that the companies with a completely Shariah compliant structure are few in number brings about investing in mixed companies that carry out Shariah non-compliant activities even though their main activity is legitimate. Depending on this necessity, companies are allowed to carry out financial activities that do not comply with Shariah principles to a certain extent. In this context, thresholds are used within the scope of Shariah screening to determine the level of non-compliant elements to Shariah in the company. There are two different approaches to determining thresholds; the minority-majority-centered approach and the necessity-centered approach. The first approach uses Shar'i evidence showing the less or more borderline when setting thresholds for all analysis of Shariah screening. The necessity-centered approach, on the other hand, focuses on determining the amount of necessity based on market data. Both methods contain methodological problems in the threshold determination processes. This study aims to reveal the problems of both methods and to propose the sectoral necessity-centered method as an alternative.","PeriodicalId":136568,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critical Review of the Thresholds of Sharia Screening for Stocks\",\"authors\":\"Batuhan Buğra Akartepe\",\"doi\":\"10.54427/ijisef.1129328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Capital markets represent the second main application area of Islamic finance after the banking sector. The most important instrument traded in these markets is stocks. The character of companies is important on the legitimacy (shariah compliance) of investing in stocks. The fact that the companies with a completely Shariah compliant structure are few in number brings about investing in mixed companies that carry out Shariah non-compliant activities even though their main activity is legitimate. Depending on this necessity, companies are allowed to carry out financial activities that do not comply with Shariah principles to a certain extent. In this context, thresholds are used within the scope of Shariah screening to determine the level of non-compliant elements to Shariah in the company. There are two different approaches to determining thresholds; the minority-majority-centered approach and the necessity-centered approach. The first approach uses Shar'i evidence showing the less or more borderline when setting thresholds for all analysis of Shariah screening. The necessity-centered approach, on the other hand, focuses on determining the amount of necessity based on market data. Both methods contain methodological problems in the threshold determination processes. This study aims to reveal the problems of both methods and to propose the sectoral necessity-centered method as an alternative.\",\"PeriodicalId\":136568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54427/ijisef.1129328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54427/ijisef.1129328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

资本市场是继银行业之后伊斯兰金融的第二个主要应用领域。在这些市场上交易的最重要的工具是股票。公司的性质对股票投资的合法性(符合伊斯兰教法)很重要。完全符合伊斯兰教法结构的公司数量很少,这一事实导致投资于从事不符合伊斯兰教法活动的混合公司,即使它们的主要活动是合法的。根据这种必要性,公司可以在一定程度上进行不符合伊斯兰教法原则的金融活动。在这种情况下,阈值在伊斯兰教法筛选范围内使用,以确定公司中不符合伊斯兰教法的元素的水平。确定阈值有两种不同的方法;以少数为中心的方法和以需求为中心的方法。第一种方法使用伊斯兰教法证据,在为所有伊斯兰教法筛选分析设置阈值时,显示出或多或少的边界。另一方面,以需求为中心的方法侧重于根据市场数据确定必需品的数量。两种方法在阈值确定过程中都存在方法学问题。本研究旨在揭示两种方法的问题,并提出以部门必要性为中心的方法作为替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Critical Review of the Thresholds of Sharia Screening for Stocks
Capital markets represent the second main application area of Islamic finance after the banking sector. The most important instrument traded in these markets is stocks. The character of companies is important on the legitimacy (shariah compliance) of investing in stocks. The fact that the companies with a completely Shariah compliant structure are few in number brings about investing in mixed companies that carry out Shariah non-compliant activities even though their main activity is legitimate. Depending on this necessity, companies are allowed to carry out financial activities that do not comply with Shariah principles to a certain extent. In this context, thresholds are used within the scope of Shariah screening to determine the level of non-compliant elements to Shariah in the company. There are two different approaches to determining thresholds; the minority-majority-centered approach and the necessity-centered approach. The first approach uses Shar'i evidence showing the less or more borderline when setting thresholds for all analysis of Shariah screening. The necessity-centered approach, on the other hand, focuses on determining the amount of necessity based on market data. Both methods contain methodological problems in the threshold determination processes. This study aims to reveal the problems of both methods and to propose the sectoral necessity-centered method as an alternative.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信