{"title":"MTTR预测的PC软件解决方案","authors":"R.J. Fousch","doi":"10.1109/ARMS.1989.49655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The various methods available in computerized maintainability prediction methods (for MIL-HDBK-472, Notice 1, Procedure 5) and the relative factors that should be considered in evaluating software techniques for MTTR (mean time to repair) and associated predictions are discussed. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are described, with a more detailed focus on the best method presented. A microcomputer is used as the basis for design evaluations, since PCs are widely available.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":430861,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings., Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PC software solutions for MTTR predictions\",\"authors\":\"R.J. Fousch\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ARMS.1989.49655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The various methods available in computerized maintainability prediction methods (for MIL-HDBK-472, Notice 1, Procedure 5) and the relative factors that should be considered in evaluating software techniques for MTTR (mean time to repair) and associated predictions are discussed. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are described, with a more detailed focus on the best method presented. A microcomputer is used as the basis for design evaluations, since PCs are widely available.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":430861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings., Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings., Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARMS.1989.49655\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings., Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARMS.1989.49655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The various methods available in computerized maintainability prediction methods (for MIL-HDBK-472, Notice 1, Procedure 5) and the relative factors that should be considered in evaluating software techniques for MTTR (mean time to repair) and associated predictions are discussed. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are described, with a more detailed focus on the best method presented. A microcomputer is used as the basis for design evaluations, since PCs are widely available.<>
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
