{"title":"风险量化的大小和倾向","authors":"O. Faugeras, G. Pagès","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3854467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose a novel approach in the assessment of a random risk variable <i>X</i> by introducing magnitude-propensity risk measures (<i>m<sub>X</sub>, p<sub>X</sub></i>). This bivariate measure intends to account for the dual aspect of risk, where the magnitudes <i>x</i> of <i>X</i> tell how high are the losses incurred, whereas the probabilities <i>P(X = x)</i> reveal how often one has to expect to suffer such losses. The basic idea is to simultaneously quantify both the severity <i>mX</i> and the propensity <i>pX</i> of the real-valued risk <i>X</i>. This is to be contrasted with traditional univariate risk measures, like VaR or Expected shortfall, which typically conflate both effects.<br><br>In its simplest form, <i>(m<sub>X</sub>, p <sub>X</sub>)</i> is obtained by mass transportation in Wasserstein metric of the law <i>P<sup>X</sup></i> of <i>X</i> to a two-points {0,<i>m<sub>X</sub></i>} discrete distribution with mass <i>p<sub>X</sub></i> at <i>m<sub>X</sub></i>. The approach can also be formulated as a constrained optimal quantization problem. <br><br>This allows for an informative comparison of risks on both the magnitude and propensity scales. Several examples illustrate the proposed approach.","PeriodicalId":306152,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Quantization by Magnitude and Propensity\",\"authors\":\"O. Faugeras, G. Pagès\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3854467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We propose a novel approach in the assessment of a random risk variable <i>X</i> by introducing magnitude-propensity risk measures (<i>m<sub>X</sub>, p<sub>X</sub></i>). This bivariate measure intends to account for the dual aspect of risk, where the magnitudes <i>x</i> of <i>X</i> tell how high are the losses incurred, whereas the probabilities <i>P(X = x)</i> reveal how often one has to expect to suffer such losses. The basic idea is to simultaneously quantify both the severity <i>mX</i> and the propensity <i>pX</i> of the real-valued risk <i>X</i>. This is to be contrasted with traditional univariate risk measures, like VaR or Expected shortfall, which typically conflate both effects.<br><br>In its simplest form, <i>(m<sub>X</sub>, p <sub>X</sub>)</i> is obtained by mass transportation in Wasserstein metric of the law <i>P<sup>X</sup></i> of <i>X</i> to a two-points {0,<i>m<sub>X</sub></i>} discrete distribution with mass <i>p<sub>X</sub></i> at <i>m<sub>X</sub></i>. The approach can also be formulated as a constrained optimal quantization problem. <br><br>This allows for an informative comparison of risks on both the magnitude and propensity scales. Several examples illustrate the proposed approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3854467\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3854467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We propose a novel approach in the assessment of a random risk variable X by introducing magnitude-propensity risk measures (mX, pX). This bivariate measure intends to account for the dual aspect of risk, where the magnitudes x of X tell how high are the losses incurred, whereas the probabilities P(X = x) reveal how often one has to expect to suffer such losses. The basic idea is to simultaneously quantify both the severity mX and the propensity pX of the real-valued risk X. This is to be contrasted with traditional univariate risk measures, like VaR or Expected shortfall, which typically conflate both effects.
In its simplest form, (mX, p X) is obtained by mass transportation in Wasserstein metric of the law PX of X to a two-points {0,mX} discrete distribution with mass pX at mX. The approach can also be formulated as a constrained optimal quantization problem.
This allows for an informative comparison of risks on both the magnitude and propensity scales. Several examples illustrate the proposed approach.