{"title":"风险”说“平价","authors":"Ryan Poirier","doi":"10.3905/jbis.2023.1.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article we introduce a new allocation strategy called Risk “Dis”-Parity. Much like Risk Parity, it considers the riskiness of both equities and bonds. However, unlike Risk Parity, this strategy explicitly considers the well-documented financial time series characteristics found in both equities and bonds. Using a rank-based methodology, our results suggest Risk “Dis”-Parity ranks higher than Risk Parity, a 60–40 Balanced portfolio, and an Equity Risk Budget approach, all of which are commonly found multi-asset allocation strategies. This result holds for both volatility-managed and non-volatility-managed strategies.","PeriodicalId":284314,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Beta Investment Strategies","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk “Dis”-Parity\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Poirier\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jbis.2023.1.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article we introduce a new allocation strategy called Risk “Dis”-Parity. Much like Risk Parity, it considers the riskiness of both equities and bonds. However, unlike Risk Parity, this strategy explicitly considers the well-documented financial time series characteristics found in both equities and bonds. Using a rank-based methodology, our results suggest Risk “Dis”-Parity ranks higher than Risk Parity, a 60–40 Balanced portfolio, and an Equity Risk Budget approach, all of which are commonly found multi-asset allocation strategies. This result holds for both volatility-managed and non-volatility-managed strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":284314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Beta Investment Strategies\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Beta Investment Strategies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jbis.2023.1.023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Beta Investment Strategies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jbis.2023.1.023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In this article we introduce a new allocation strategy called Risk “Dis”-Parity. Much like Risk Parity, it considers the riskiness of both equities and bonds. However, unlike Risk Parity, this strategy explicitly considers the well-documented financial time series characteristics found in both equities and bonds. Using a rank-based methodology, our results suggest Risk “Dis”-Parity ranks higher than Risk Parity, a 60–40 Balanced portfolio, and an Equity Risk Budget approach, all of which are commonly found multi-asset allocation strategies. This result holds for both volatility-managed and non-volatility-managed strategies.