Michael Janis
{"title":"Amina (review)","authors":"Michael Janis","doi":"10.1353/afr.0.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"unpropitious surroundings. Neither country comes under focus in this book (South Africa is mentioned on one page only). The book under review is not a straightforward survey of the trials and tribulations of recent democratization attempts in Africa. Instead, it is a rather odd hybrid, structured in three separate sections. The first section is entitled ‘Intellectuals, writers and soldiers’ and features three chapters that collectively look at how three of Africa’s literary giants – Soyinka, Ngugi and Achebe – have viewed the problematic of Africa’s political vicissitudes. In addition, the section also includes a chapter on how Africa’s (many) military rulers have sought to justify their regimes through literary defences. The second section is entitled ‘Students, youths and people’. It has three fieldwork-based chapters covering what might be called bottom-up political opposition in three countries: Cameroon, Nigeria, and Malawi. Seemingly tacked on to the end is a rather unrelated chapter about ‘identity and knowledge production in the fourth generation’ that does not really fit well with the preceding three chapters. There is no concluding chapter to tie things together. Overall, it is not clear to whom this book is supposed to appeal. It is too variable and poorly focused for the political scientists, while I suspect that those interested in the use of literature as a political weapon will not find much here with which they were not already familiar.","PeriodicalId":337749,"journal":{"name":"Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute","volume":"495 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/afr.0.0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不吉利的环境。这两个国家在这本书中都没有受到关注(南非只在一页上被提到)。书评中的这本书并不是对非洲最近民主化尝试的考验和磨难的直接调查。相反,它是一个相当奇怪的混合体,由三个独立的部分组成。第一部分的标题是“知识分子、作家和士兵”,其中有三章共同探讨了三位非洲文学巨子——索因卡、恩古吉和阿奇贝——如何看待非洲政治变迁的问题。此外,本节还包括一章关于非洲(许多)军事统治者如何通过文学辩护来为他们的政权辩护。第二部分的题目是“学生、青年和人民”。它有三个基于实地工作的章节,涵盖了喀麦隆、尼日利亚和马拉维这三个国家的自下而上的政治反对。似乎附在最后的是一个相当不相关的章节,关于“第四代的身份和知识生产”,这与前面的三章不太吻合。没有结束语来把事情联系起来。总的来说,不清楚这本书应该吸引谁。对于政治科学家来说,这本书太多变,而且重点不明确,而我怀疑,那些对文学作为政治武器的使用感兴趣的人,在这里不会发现很多他们不熟悉的东西。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Amina (review)
unpropitious surroundings. Neither country comes under focus in this book (South Africa is mentioned on one page only). The book under review is not a straightforward survey of the trials and tribulations of recent democratization attempts in Africa. Instead, it is a rather odd hybrid, structured in three separate sections. The first section is entitled ‘Intellectuals, writers and soldiers’ and features three chapters that collectively look at how three of Africa’s literary giants – Soyinka, Ngugi and Achebe – have viewed the problematic of Africa’s political vicissitudes. In addition, the section also includes a chapter on how Africa’s (many) military rulers have sought to justify their regimes through literary defences. The second section is entitled ‘Students, youths and people’. It has three fieldwork-based chapters covering what might be called bottom-up political opposition in three countries: Cameroon, Nigeria, and Malawi. Seemingly tacked on to the end is a rather unrelated chapter about ‘identity and knowledge production in the fourth generation’ that does not really fit well with the preceding three chapters. There is no concluding chapter to tie things together. Overall, it is not clear to whom this book is supposed to appeal. It is too variable and poorly focused for the political scientists, while I suspect that those interested in the use of literature as a political weapon will not find much here with which they were not already familiar.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信