健康影响评估公众范围的PATH(人民评估他们的健康)过程和审议性民意调查

S. Kotamas
{"title":"健康影响评估公众范围的PATH(人民评估他们的健康)过程和审议性民意调查","authors":"S. Kotamas","doi":"10.4172/2332-0761.1000216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this literature review to compare the process to develop a suitable process for public scoping in health impact assessment, which found that the PATH and the Deliberative Opinion Poll are suitable to be developed for use by the public scoping process. The PATH is a process-oriented quality data. It helps to understand the community context deeply, the relationship between cultural traditions, community resources and valuable resource comments on the project and concerns on the impact that will affect your health. In the process of deliberative opinion poll is a process that allows for the acquisition of quantitative data to support qualitative data. Remember, making a clear picture even further. The data values and the benefits of resource comments on the project awareness, understanding of the project and Issue concerns the potential impact on the community. So these two processes are suitable for use in public scoping process.","PeriodicalId":118558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PATH (People Assessing Their Health) Process and Deliberative Opinion Poll for Public Scoping in Health Impact Assessment\",\"authors\":\"S. Kotamas\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2332-0761.1000216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this literature review to compare the process to develop a suitable process for public scoping in health impact assessment, which found that the PATH and the Deliberative Opinion Poll are suitable to be developed for use by the public scoping process. The PATH is a process-oriented quality data. It helps to understand the community context deeply, the relationship between cultural traditions, community resources and valuable resource comments on the project and concerns on the impact that will affect your health. In the process of deliberative opinion poll is a process that allows for the acquisition of quantitative data to support qualitative data. Remember, making a clear picture even further. The data values and the benefits of resource comments on the project awareness, understanding of the project and Issue concerns the potential impact on the community. So these two processes are suitable for use in public scoping process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2332-0761.1000216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2332-0761.1000216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文的文献综述中,比较了在卫生影响评估中制定合适的公共范围评估过程的过程,发现适宜卫生技术方案和审议性意见调查适合开发供公共范围评估过程使用。PATH是一个面向过程的质量数据。它有助于深入了解社区背景、文化传统、社区资源和对项目的宝贵资源评论之间的关系以及对影响您健康的影响的关注。在协商民意调查的过程中,是一个允许获得定量数据来支持定性数据的过程。记住,要画得更清晰。数据价值和资源评论对项目的认识、对项目的理解以及对社区潜在影响的关注。因此,这两个过程适合用于公共范围界定过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PATH (People Assessing Their Health) Process and Deliberative Opinion Poll for Public Scoping in Health Impact Assessment
In this literature review to compare the process to develop a suitable process for public scoping in health impact assessment, which found that the PATH and the Deliberative Opinion Poll are suitable to be developed for use by the public scoping process. The PATH is a process-oriented quality data. It helps to understand the community context deeply, the relationship between cultural traditions, community resources and valuable resource comments on the project and concerns on the impact that will affect your health. In the process of deliberative opinion poll is a process that allows for the acquisition of quantitative data to support qualitative data. Remember, making a clear picture even further. The data values and the benefits of resource comments on the project awareness, understanding of the project and Issue concerns the potential impact on the community. So these two processes are suitable for use in public scoping process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信