窄环境下非完整路径规划的连续碰撞检测方法

Daniel Henning, Georg Schildbach
{"title":"窄环境下非完整路径规划的连续碰撞检测方法","authors":"Daniel Henning, Georg Schildbach","doi":"10.1109/ICSTCC55426.2022.9931874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a new method of collision checking for non-holonomic dynamical systems in environments with narrow passages. This new method is compared with alternative approaches for collision checking, which are widely used in conjunction with different path planners. All methods are evaluated in a systematic simulation study with numerous scenarios, using two of the most popular path planning methods, Hybrid A* and RRT*. On the one hand, the results show that the new collision checking approach can manage the narrow passages better than the compared methods. On the other hand, its computation time can be longer or shorter, depending on the particular scenario.","PeriodicalId":220845,"journal":{"name":"2022 26th International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC)","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Continuous Collision Checking Method for Non-holonomic Path Planning in Narrow Environments\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Henning, Georg Schildbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSTCC55426.2022.9931874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a new method of collision checking for non-holonomic dynamical systems in environments with narrow passages. This new method is compared with alternative approaches for collision checking, which are widely used in conjunction with different path planners. All methods are evaluated in a systematic simulation study with numerous scenarios, using two of the most popular path planning methods, Hybrid A* and RRT*. On the one hand, the results show that the new collision checking approach can manage the narrow passages better than the compared methods. On the other hand, its computation time can be longer or shorter, depending on the particular scenario.\",\"PeriodicalId\":220845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 26th International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC)\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 26th International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTCC55426.2022.9931874\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 26th International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTCC55426.2022.9931874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文提出了窄通道环境下非完整动力系统碰撞检测的一种新方法。该方法与其他碰撞检测方法进行了比较,这些方法通常与不同的路径规划器结合使用。采用两种最流行的路径规划方法Hybrid a *和RRT*,在系统仿真研究中对所有方法进行了评估。结果表明,该碰撞检测方法能较好地处理窄通道。另一方面,它的计算时间可能更长或更短,这取决于特定的场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Continuous Collision Checking Method for Non-holonomic Path Planning in Narrow Environments
This paper presents a new method of collision checking for non-holonomic dynamical systems in environments with narrow passages. This new method is compared with alternative approaches for collision checking, which are widely used in conjunction with different path planners. All methods are evaluated in a systematic simulation study with numerous scenarios, using two of the most popular path planning methods, Hybrid A* and RRT*. On the one hand, the results show that the new collision checking approach can manage the narrow passages better than the compared methods. On the other hand, its computation time can be longer or shorter, depending on the particular scenario.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信