概念变化模型学习辅助PhET模拟的批判性思维能力分析

Zul Hidayatullah, I. Wilujeng, Aminatul Munawaroh
{"title":"概念变化模型学习辅助PhET模拟的批判性思维能力分析","authors":"Zul Hidayatullah, I. Wilujeng, Aminatul Munawaroh","doi":"10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210305.091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aims of this research were 1) to analyze the level of critical thinking skills of students through learning based on the Conceptual Change Model (CCM) assisted by PhET simulation on momentum and impulse material; 2) to determine the differences in critical thinking skills between students who received learning with CCM assisted by PhET simulations and students who received conventional learning. The type of this research is a quasi-experimental research design with Posttest Control Group Design. The study population was all students of class X MIPA SMAN 1 Ngaglik with the sampling technique using simple random sampling. The research sample was students in class X MIPA 2 which were used as the experimental class and students in class X MIPA 1 as the control class. Critical thinking skills are obtained using multiple-choice tests and description tests. The aspects of critical thinking that are measured are basic clarification, inference, analysis, evaluation, and explanation. The analysis in this study uses descriptive statistics and independent t-test. Statistical test results provide a conclusion that there are differences in students' critical thinking skills in the experimental class with the control class. The critical thinking skills of students in the experimental class are higher than those of students in the control class for aspects of basic clarification, inference, evaluation, and explanation. As for the analysis aspect, the control class students were higher than the experimental class. The Critical thinking skill in the experimental class is good with an average of 68.03 and the control class in the moderate category","PeriodicalId":378773,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Sciences (ICRIEMS 2020)","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Critical Thinking Skill Through Conceptual Change Model Learning Assisted with PhET Simulation\",\"authors\":\"Zul Hidayatullah, I. Wilujeng, Aminatul Munawaroh\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210305.091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aims of this research were 1) to analyze the level of critical thinking skills of students through learning based on the Conceptual Change Model (CCM) assisted by PhET simulation on momentum and impulse material; 2) to determine the differences in critical thinking skills between students who received learning with CCM assisted by PhET simulations and students who received conventional learning. The type of this research is a quasi-experimental research design with Posttest Control Group Design. The study population was all students of class X MIPA SMAN 1 Ngaglik with the sampling technique using simple random sampling. The research sample was students in class X MIPA 2 which were used as the experimental class and students in class X MIPA 1 as the control class. Critical thinking skills are obtained using multiple-choice tests and description tests. The aspects of critical thinking that are measured are basic clarification, inference, analysis, evaluation, and explanation. The analysis in this study uses descriptive statistics and independent t-test. Statistical test results provide a conclusion that there are differences in students' critical thinking skills in the experimental class with the control class. The critical thinking skills of students in the experimental class are higher than those of students in the control class for aspects of basic clarification, inference, evaluation, and explanation. As for the analysis aspect, the control class students were higher than the experimental class. The Critical thinking skill in the experimental class is good with an average of 68.03 and the control class in the moderate category\",\"PeriodicalId\":378773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Sciences (ICRIEMS 2020)\",\"volume\":\"137 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Sciences (ICRIEMS 2020)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210305.091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Sciences (ICRIEMS 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210305.091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究的目的是:1)基于概念变化模型(CCM),辅以PhET模拟动量和冲量材料,分析学生在学习过程中的批判性思维能力水平;2)确定采用模拟PhET辅助CCM学习的学生与常规学习的学生在批判性思维技能上的差异。本研究类型为准实验研究设计,采用后测控制组设计。研究人群为MIPA SMAN 1 Ngaglik X班所有学生,采用简单随机抽样的抽样技术。研究样本为X MIPA 2班学生作为实验班,X MIPA 1班学生作为对照班。批判性思维能力是通过多项选择测验和描述测验获得的。衡量批判性思维的几个方面是基本的澄清、推理、分析、评价和解释。本研究采用描述性统计和独立t检验进行分析。统计检验结果表明,实验班学生的批判性思维能力与对照组存在差异。实验班学生在基本澄清、推理、评价、解释等方面的批判性思维能力均高于对照组学生。在分析方面,控制班学生高于实验班学生。实验班的批判性思维能力较好,平均为68.03分,对照组为中等
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Critical Thinking Skill Through Conceptual Change Model Learning Assisted with PhET Simulation
The aims of this research were 1) to analyze the level of critical thinking skills of students through learning based on the Conceptual Change Model (CCM) assisted by PhET simulation on momentum and impulse material; 2) to determine the differences in critical thinking skills between students who received learning with CCM assisted by PhET simulations and students who received conventional learning. The type of this research is a quasi-experimental research design with Posttest Control Group Design. The study population was all students of class X MIPA SMAN 1 Ngaglik with the sampling technique using simple random sampling. The research sample was students in class X MIPA 2 which were used as the experimental class and students in class X MIPA 1 as the control class. Critical thinking skills are obtained using multiple-choice tests and description tests. The aspects of critical thinking that are measured are basic clarification, inference, analysis, evaluation, and explanation. The analysis in this study uses descriptive statistics and independent t-test. Statistical test results provide a conclusion that there are differences in students' critical thinking skills in the experimental class with the control class. The critical thinking skills of students in the experimental class are higher than those of students in the control class for aspects of basic clarification, inference, evaluation, and explanation. As for the analysis aspect, the control class students were higher than the experimental class. The Critical thinking skill in the experimental class is good with an average of 68.03 and the control class in the moderate category
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信