外交关系法是讨价还价的工具?

F. Lange
{"title":"外交关系法是讨价还价的工具?","authors":"F. Lange","doi":"10.1017/9781108942713.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To perceive foreign relations law as a self-standing academic subfield, perspective or theme which enlightens our understanding of the linkages between national and international law is a rather novel phenomenon. In most jurisdictions an academic tradition of foreign relations law as a separate field or theme does not exist. Issues of foreign relations law such as the separation of powers in foreign affairs or the integration of international law into the domestic order are often either discussed in treatises of constitutional or international law, or in both. For instance, not only the Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution contains a chapter on the case law of the Indian Supreme Court dealing with the status of international law in the Indian legal system but also the edited volume Comparative International Law includes a contribution addressing how the Indian Supreme Court integrates human rights law into the domestic order. Moreover, if, like in the United States, a foreign relations law tradition exists, the norms of the US Constitution and the case law of the Supreme Court which relate to foreign affairs are often taught and analyzed by scholars who teach and write on international and domestic","PeriodicalId":231079,"journal":{"name":"Encounters between Foreign Relations Law and International Law","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Foreign Relations Law As a Bargaining Tool?\",\"authors\":\"F. Lange\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781108942713.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To perceive foreign relations law as a self-standing academic subfield, perspective or theme which enlightens our understanding of the linkages between national and international law is a rather novel phenomenon. In most jurisdictions an academic tradition of foreign relations law as a separate field or theme does not exist. Issues of foreign relations law such as the separation of powers in foreign affairs or the integration of international law into the domestic order are often either discussed in treatises of constitutional or international law, or in both. For instance, not only the Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution contains a chapter on the case law of the Indian Supreme Court dealing with the status of international law in the Indian legal system but also the edited volume Comparative International Law includes a contribution addressing how the Indian Supreme Court integrates human rights law into the domestic order. Moreover, if, like in the United States, a foreign relations law tradition exists, the norms of the US Constitution and the case law of the Supreme Court which relate to foreign affairs are often taught and analyzed by scholars who teach and write on international and domestic\",\"PeriodicalId\":231079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Encounters between Foreign Relations Law and International Law\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Encounters between Foreign Relations Law and International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108942713.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encounters between Foreign Relations Law and International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108942713.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将外交关系法视为一个独立的学术分支、视角或主题,从而启发我们对国内法与国际法之间联系的理解,这是一种相当新颖的现象。在大多数司法管辖区,不存在将外交关系法作为单独领域或主题的学术传统。外交关系法的问题,如外交事务中的权力分立或国际法与国内秩序的整合,经常在宪法或国际法的论文中讨论,或在两者中讨论。例如,不仅《牛津印度宪法手册》中有一章是关于印度最高法院的判例法,讨论国际法在印度法律体系中的地位,而且编辑的《比较国际法》一书中也有一章是关于印度最高法院如何将人权法纳入国内秩序的。此外,如果像美国一样存在外交关系法传统,那么美国宪法的规范和最高法院的判例法与外交事务有关,经常由教授和撰写国际和国内问题的学者教授和分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Foreign Relations Law As a Bargaining Tool?
To perceive foreign relations law as a self-standing academic subfield, perspective or theme which enlightens our understanding of the linkages between national and international law is a rather novel phenomenon. In most jurisdictions an academic tradition of foreign relations law as a separate field or theme does not exist. Issues of foreign relations law such as the separation of powers in foreign affairs or the integration of international law into the domestic order are often either discussed in treatises of constitutional or international law, or in both. For instance, not only the Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution contains a chapter on the case law of the Indian Supreme Court dealing with the status of international law in the Indian legal system but also the edited volume Comparative International Law includes a contribution addressing how the Indian Supreme Court integrates human rights law into the domestic order. Moreover, if, like in the United States, a foreign relations law tradition exists, the norms of the US Constitution and the case law of the Supreme Court which relate to foreign affairs are often taught and analyzed by scholars who teach and write on international and domestic
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信