路由协议在真实和模拟环境中的收敛

R. Petija, M. Michalko, F. Jakab, P. Fecil'ak
{"title":"路由协议在真实和模拟环境中的收敛","authors":"R. Petija, M. Michalko, F. Jakab, P. Fecil'ak","doi":"10.1109/ICETA.2018.8572184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the comparative analysis of dynamic routing protocols EIGRP and OSPF is presented. The objective of analysis was to determine which routing protocol is converging faster. For testing, three approaches were used, namely simulation using OPNET simulator, emulation using GNS3 emulator and testing using real devices. Network topology that was used for testing purpose provide three possible paths between source and destination device. Generating large amount of echo request messages and observing echo reply message before and after link failure provide time needed to achieve convergence in network. Comparing the results obtained using real devices and simulator / emulator showed some shortcomings of OPNET and GNS. From the test results, it can be said that the dynamic routing protocol EIGRP is converging faster. This protocol is therefore more suitable for implementation in production infrastructures.","PeriodicalId":304523,"journal":{"name":"2018 16th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Convergence of Routing Protocols in Real and Simulated Environments\",\"authors\":\"R. Petija, M. Michalko, F. Jakab, P. Fecil'ak\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICETA.2018.8572184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, the comparative analysis of dynamic routing protocols EIGRP and OSPF is presented. The objective of analysis was to determine which routing protocol is converging faster. For testing, three approaches were used, namely simulation using OPNET simulator, emulation using GNS3 emulator and testing using real devices. Network topology that was used for testing purpose provide three possible paths between source and destination device. Generating large amount of echo request messages and observing echo reply message before and after link failure provide time needed to achieve convergence in network. Comparing the results obtained using real devices and simulator / emulator showed some shortcomings of OPNET and GNS. From the test results, it can be said that the dynamic routing protocol EIGRP is converging faster. This protocol is therefore more suitable for implementation in production infrastructures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":304523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 16th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA)\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 16th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETA.2018.8572184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 16th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETA.2018.8572184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本文对动态路由协议EIGRP和OSPF进行了比较分析。分析的目的是确定哪种路由协议收敛得更快。测试采用了三种方法,即OPNET模拟器仿真、GNS3模拟器仿真和真实设备测试。用于测试目的的网络拓扑提供了源设备和目标设备之间的三条可能路径。产生大量的echo请求消息和观察链路故障前后的echo应答消息,为网络实现收敛提供了时间。通过对比实际设备和仿真器的结果,发现了OPNET和GNS的一些不足。从测试结果可以看出,动态路由协议EIGRP收敛速度更快。因此,该协议更适合在生产基础设施中实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Convergence of Routing Protocols in Real and Simulated Environments
In this paper, the comparative analysis of dynamic routing protocols EIGRP and OSPF is presented. The objective of analysis was to determine which routing protocol is converging faster. For testing, three approaches were used, namely simulation using OPNET simulator, emulation using GNS3 emulator and testing using real devices. Network topology that was used for testing purpose provide three possible paths between source and destination device. Generating large amount of echo request messages and observing echo reply message before and after link failure provide time needed to achieve convergence in network. Comparing the results obtained using real devices and simulator / emulator showed some shortcomings of OPNET and GNS. From the test results, it can be said that the dynamic routing protocol EIGRP is converging faster. This protocol is therefore more suitable for implementation in production infrastructures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信