{"title":"面向兄弟人文主义的教育新视野","authors":"Vincenzo Zani","doi":"10.15365/JOCE.2401152021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers three fundamental perspectives for Catholic education, all mentioned in the encyclical letter Populorum Progressio of Paul VI, which have also been present in the teachings of successive pontiffs. The first perspective is the need to build a new civilization and the idea that ”the world suffers due to lack of thought.” The second perspective is the idea that ”there is no true humanism but in the opening to the Absolute.” The third perspective is the idea that at the origin of injustice there is a lack of fraternity. The second Vatican Council stated that ”true education should promote the formation of the human person both in view of its ultimate purpose and for the good of different societies.” This invitation of the Council Fathers is still very current and is directed especially to those who have positions of responsibility in the world of education. The article is adapted with minor modifications from an address at the closing session of the OIECWorld Congress held in New York in June 2019. T he title of OIEC’s World Congress, Educatio Si, is inspired by a document of our Congregation. It evokes the encyclical letter Populorum Progressio in which St. Paul VI (1967 ), who visited the United Nations on October 4, 1965, suggested an alternative path for the realization of a new humanity that would avoid falling into the temptations of sterile oppositions between countries and barbaric warfare. The Holy See, in its diplomatic activity at the service of reconciliation, peace and integral development, has ever since been inspired by that message. In the context of growing interdependence, the path of dialogue and subsidiarity is preferable to that of conflict. In the words of Paul VI, 1 Congregation for Catholic Education A New Vision for Education 257 some activities of the Church and the State are, in a way, complementary, and the good of the individual and of the community of the peoples requires an open dialogue and a sincere understanding between the Church on the one hand and the states on the other, to establish, foster and strengthen the relations of mutual understanding, coordination and mutual collaboration and to prevent or to remedy any disagreement, in order to reach the realization of great human hopes, of peace between nations, of internal tranquility and of the progress of each country.1 This approach extends to multilateral diplomacy and international cooperation, as discussed in the documents of the Social Doctrine of the Church, in particular following the Second Vatican Council. Gravissimum Educationis (Paul VI, 1965) emphasizes in its conclusion the need for collaboration of educational entities at the diocesan, national and international levels, including with international organizations. There is a profound convergence between Populorum Pprogressio (Paul VI, 1967), the encyclical Caritas in Veritate of Benedict XVI (2009 ), and the magisterium of Pope Francis. Three fundamental perspectives, all mentioned in the encyclical of Paul VI (1967), have been present in successive pontiffs. The first perspective is the need to build a new civilization and the idea that ”the world suffers due to lack of thought” (no. 85). The second perspective is the idea that ”there is no true humanism but in the opening to the Absolute” (no. 42). The third perspective is the idea that at the origin of injustice there is a lack of fraternity (no. 66). These are the three topics that I would like to explore today. Knowing How To Think In today’s world marked by globalization, we must ask questions about the future of humanity. Long-term planning is necessary, but not simply to promote efficiency. While science, technology and economics may increase the reach of man, they do not necessarily improve his humanity. There is a risk for humanity to be placed in a society governed by algorithms which tend to be guided only by artificial intelligence, with serious and real risks of man simply becoming like a superficial and trivial machine.2 Wemust have the courage to impart to young generations the value of “knowing how to think” to help them become truly free and creative, and avoid the risks of a disintegrating society. Today more than ever, we need people who know how to think correctly so that they can make decisions with prudence, moderation and justice. Immersed as we are in the Areopagus of cultures and in the market of technologies, rethinking education means, above all, promoting the unity of knowledge as an antidote to the fragmentation and the disintegration of the sociocultural landscape. 1 Paolo VI, Motu Proprio Sollicitudo omnium Ecclesiarum, 24 giugno 1969. Proemio. 2 Morin, E. Prefazione, in M. Ceruti. 2018. Il tempo della complessità, Raffaello Cortina Editore, Milano.","PeriodicalId":248502,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Catholic Education","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Vision for Education Towards Fraternal Humanism\",\"authors\":\"Vincenzo Zani\",\"doi\":\"10.15365/JOCE.2401152021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article considers three fundamental perspectives for Catholic education, all mentioned in the encyclical letter Populorum Progressio of Paul VI, which have also been present in the teachings of successive pontiffs. The first perspective is the need to build a new civilization and the idea that ”the world suffers due to lack of thought.” The second perspective is the idea that ”there is no true humanism but in the opening to the Absolute.” The third perspective is the idea that at the origin of injustice there is a lack of fraternity. The second Vatican Council stated that ”true education should promote the formation of the human person both in view of its ultimate purpose and for the good of different societies.” This invitation of the Council Fathers is still very current and is directed especially to those who have positions of responsibility in the world of education. The article is adapted with minor modifications from an address at the closing session of the OIECWorld Congress held in New York in June 2019. T he title of OIEC’s World Congress, Educatio Si, is inspired by a document of our Congregation. It evokes the encyclical letter Populorum Progressio in which St. Paul VI (1967 ), who visited the United Nations on October 4, 1965, suggested an alternative path for the realization of a new humanity that would avoid falling into the temptations of sterile oppositions between countries and barbaric warfare. The Holy See, in its diplomatic activity at the service of reconciliation, peace and integral development, has ever since been inspired by that message. In the context of growing interdependence, the path of dialogue and subsidiarity is preferable to that of conflict. In the words of Paul VI, 1 Congregation for Catholic Education A New Vision for Education 257 some activities of the Church and the State are, in a way, complementary, and the good of the individual and of the community of the peoples requires an open dialogue and a sincere understanding between the Church on the one hand and the states on the other, to establish, foster and strengthen the relations of mutual understanding, coordination and mutual collaboration and to prevent or to remedy any disagreement, in order to reach the realization of great human hopes, of peace between nations, of internal tranquility and of the progress of each country.1 This approach extends to multilateral diplomacy and international cooperation, as discussed in the documents of the Social Doctrine of the Church, in particular following the Second Vatican Council. Gravissimum Educationis (Paul VI, 1965) emphasizes in its conclusion the need for collaboration of educational entities at the diocesan, national and international levels, including with international organizations. There is a profound convergence between Populorum Pprogressio (Paul VI, 1967), the encyclical Caritas in Veritate of Benedict XVI (2009 ), and the magisterium of Pope Francis. Three fundamental perspectives, all mentioned in the encyclical of Paul VI (1967), have been present in successive pontiffs. The first perspective is the need to build a new civilization and the idea that ”the world suffers due to lack of thought” (no. 85). The second perspective is the idea that ”there is no true humanism but in the opening to the Absolute” (no. 42). The third perspective is the idea that at the origin of injustice there is a lack of fraternity (no. 66). These are the three topics that I would like to explore today. Knowing How To Think In today’s world marked by globalization, we must ask questions about the future of humanity. Long-term planning is necessary, but not simply to promote efficiency. While science, technology and economics may increase the reach of man, they do not necessarily improve his humanity. There is a risk for humanity to be placed in a society governed by algorithms which tend to be guided only by artificial intelligence, with serious and real risks of man simply becoming like a superficial and trivial machine.2 Wemust have the courage to impart to young generations the value of “knowing how to think” to help them become truly free and creative, and avoid the risks of a disintegrating society. Today more than ever, we need people who know how to think correctly so that they can make decisions with prudence, moderation and justice. Immersed as we are in the Areopagus of cultures and in the market of technologies, rethinking education means, above all, promoting the unity of knowledge as an antidote to the fragmentation and the disintegration of the sociocultural landscape. 1 Paolo VI, Motu Proprio Sollicitudo omnium Ecclesiarum, 24 giugno 1969. Proemio. 2 Morin, E. Prefazione, in M. Ceruti. 2018. Il tempo della complessità, Raffaello Cortina Editore, Milano.\",\"PeriodicalId\":248502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Catholic Education\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Catholic Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15365/JOCE.2401152021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Catholic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15365/JOCE.2401152021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文考虑了天主教教育的三个基本观点,所有这些观点都在保罗六世的通谕《人民进步》中提到,这些观点也出现在历任教皇的教导中。第一个视角是建设新文明的需要和“世界因缺乏思想而受苦”的观点。第二种观点认为“只有向绝对开放,才有真正的人文主义”。第三种观点认为,不公正的根源在于缺乏博爱。梵蒂冈第二届大公会议指出:“真正的教育应促进人的形成,既考虑到其最终目的,也考虑到不同社会的利益。”大公会议神长的这一邀请仍然是最新的,特别针对那些在教育界负有责任的人。本文改编自2019年6月在纽约举行的OIECWorld大会闭幕会议上的讲话,并进行了轻微修改。OIEC世界大会的标题“教育大会”的灵感来自于我们大会的一份文件。这让人想起1965年10月4日访问联合国的圣保禄六世(1967年)在《人民进步》通谕中提出的避免陷入国与国之间毫无结果的对立和野蛮战争的诱惑,实现新人类的替代道路。罗马教廷在其为和解、和平与整体发展服务的外交活动中一直受到这一信息的鼓舞。在日益相互依存的情况下,对话和辅助的道路比冲突的道路更可取。用保禄六世的话说,1天主教教育部:教育的新愿景257教会和国家的一些活动在某种程度上是相辅相成的,为了个人和人民团体的利益,需要教会和国家之间进行公开的对话和真诚的理解,以建立、促进和加强相互理解的关系。协调和相互合作,防止或纠正任何分歧,以实现人类的伟大希望,实现国家间的和平,实现国内的安宁和每个国家的进步正如《教会社会训导》的文件所讨论的,特别是在梵蒂冈第二届大公会议之后,这种做法扩展到多边外交和国际合作。《重大教育》(保禄六世,1965年)在其结论中强调需要在教区、国家和国际各级的教育机构合作,包括与国际组织合作。在《人民进步》(保禄六世,1967年)、本笃十六世的《真理中的明爱》通谕(2009年)和教宗方济各的训导之间存在着深刻的融合。三个基本的观点,所有提到在通谕保罗六世(1967年),已经出现在历届教皇。第一个观点是需要建立一个新的文明,以及“世界因缺乏思想而受苦”的观点。85)。第二种观点认为,“除了向绝对敞开大门之外,没有真正的人文主义”。42)。第三种观点认为,不公正的根源在于缺乏博爱。66)。这就是我今天想探讨的三个主题。在以全球化为标志的当今世界,我们必须对人类的未来提出问题。长期规划是必要的,但不仅仅是为了提高效率。虽然科学、技术和经济可以扩大人类的活动范围,但它们并不一定能改善人类的人性。人类处在一个由算法统治的社会中是有风险的,而这些算法往往只受人工智能的引导,人类有严重而真实的风险,可能会变得像一台肤浅而琐碎的机器我们必须有勇气向年轻一代传授“懂得思考”的价值,帮助他们真正获得自由和创造力,避免社会解体的风险。今天,我们比以往任何时候都更需要懂得正确思考的人,这样他们才能做出审慎、适度和公正的决定。当我们沉浸在文化的竞技场和技术的市场中时,重新思考教育首先意味着促进知识的统一,作为社会文化景观碎片化和解体的解毒剂。1保禄六世,《教会自告之理》,1969年9月24日。[2]陈建平,《中国科学院学报》,2018。Il tempo della complessit,拉斐尔·科尔蒂纳·伊迪托雷,米兰。
A New Vision for Education Towards Fraternal Humanism
This article considers three fundamental perspectives for Catholic education, all mentioned in the encyclical letter Populorum Progressio of Paul VI, which have also been present in the teachings of successive pontiffs. The first perspective is the need to build a new civilization and the idea that ”the world suffers due to lack of thought.” The second perspective is the idea that ”there is no true humanism but in the opening to the Absolute.” The third perspective is the idea that at the origin of injustice there is a lack of fraternity. The second Vatican Council stated that ”true education should promote the formation of the human person both in view of its ultimate purpose and for the good of different societies.” This invitation of the Council Fathers is still very current and is directed especially to those who have positions of responsibility in the world of education. The article is adapted with minor modifications from an address at the closing session of the OIECWorld Congress held in New York in June 2019. T he title of OIEC’s World Congress, Educatio Si, is inspired by a document of our Congregation. It evokes the encyclical letter Populorum Progressio in which St. Paul VI (1967 ), who visited the United Nations on October 4, 1965, suggested an alternative path for the realization of a new humanity that would avoid falling into the temptations of sterile oppositions between countries and barbaric warfare. The Holy See, in its diplomatic activity at the service of reconciliation, peace and integral development, has ever since been inspired by that message. In the context of growing interdependence, the path of dialogue and subsidiarity is preferable to that of conflict. In the words of Paul VI, 1 Congregation for Catholic Education A New Vision for Education 257 some activities of the Church and the State are, in a way, complementary, and the good of the individual and of the community of the peoples requires an open dialogue and a sincere understanding between the Church on the one hand and the states on the other, to establish, foster and strengthen the relations of mutual understanding, coordination and mutual collaboration and to prevent or to remedy any disagreement, in order to reach the realization of great human hopes, of peace between nations, of internal tranquility and of the progress of each country.1 This approach extends to multilateral diplomacy and international cooperation, as discussed in the documents of the Social Doctrine of the Church, in particular following the Second Vatican Council. Gravissimum Educationis (Paul VI, 1965) emphasizes in its conclusion the need for collaboration of educational entities at the diocesan, national and international levels, including with international organizations. There is a profound convergence between Populorum Pprogressio (Paul VI, 1967), the encyclical Caritas in Veritate of Benedict XVI (2009 ), and the magisterium of Pope Francis. Three fundamental perspectives, all mentioned in the encyclical of Paul VI (1967), have been present in successive pontiffs. The first perspective is the need to build a new civilization and the idea that ”the world suffers due to lack of thought” (no. 85). The second perspective is the idea that ”there is no true humanism but in the opening to the Absolute” (no. 42). The third perspective is the idea that at the origin of injustice there is a lack of fraternity (no. 66). These are the three topics that I would like to explore today. Knowing How To Think In today’s world marked by globalization, we must ask questions about the future of humanity. Long-term planning is necessary, but not simply to promote efficiency. While science, technology and economics may increase the reach of man, they do not necessarily improve his humanity. There is a risk for humanity to be placed in a society governed by algorithms which tend to be guided only by artificial intelligence, with serious and real risks of man simply becoming like a superficial and trivial machine.2 Wemust have the courage to impart to young generations the value of “knowing how to think” to help them become truly free and creative, and avoid the risks of a disintegrating society. Today more than ever, we need people who know how to think correctly so that they can make decisions with prudence, moderation and justice. Immersed as we are in the Areopagus of cultures and in the market of technologies, rethinking education means, above all, promoting the unity of knowledge as an antidote to the fragmentation and the disintegration of the sociocultural landscape. 1 Paolo VI, Motu Proprio Sollicitudo omnium Ecclesiarum, 24 giugno 1969. Proemio. 2 Morin, E. Prefazione, in M. Ceruti. 2018. Il tempo della complessità, Raffaello Cortina Editore, Milano.