并购中被忽视的伦理问题:法律、经济和哲学问题透视

Robert W. McGee
{"title":"并购中被忽视的伦理问题:法律、经济和哲学问题透视","authors":"Robert W. McGee","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.242514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Practically every article that has ever been written about the economic, legal or ethical aspects of acquisitions and mergers has proceeded to discuss the topic from the viewpoint of the initiators, the predators, to use a pejorative term. Very little has been written about the individuals who try to prevent an acquisition or a merger. Still less has been written about the ethical issues involved in attempting to prevent an acquisition or merger. This article attempts to fill that gap in the literature. The author looks at attempts to prevent consenting adults from entering into an acquisition or merger from both the utilitarian and rights perspectives and concludes that individuals who attempt to prevent consensual activity in the area of acquisitions and mergers engage in unethical conduct, whether viewed from the utilitarian ethical perspective or the perspective of property and contract rights.","PeriodicalId":162065,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Law & Economics: Private Law (Topic)","volume":"145 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overlooked Ethical Questions in Acquisitions and Mergers: A Look at Some Legal, Economic and Philosophical Issues\",\"authors\":\"Robert W. McGee\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.242514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Practically every article that has ever been written about the economic, legal or ethical aspects of acquisitions and mergers has proceeded to discuss the topic from the viewpoint of the initiators, the predators, to use a pejorative term. Very little has been written about the individuals who try to prevent an acquisition or a merger. Still less has been written about the ethical issues involved in attempting to prevent an acquisition or merger. This article attempts to fill that gap in the literature. The author looks at attempts to prevent consenting adults from entering into an acquisition or merger from both the utilitarian and rights perspectives and concludes that individuals who attempt to prevent consensual activity in the area of acquisitions and mergers engage in unethical conduct, whether viewed from the utilitarian ethical perspective or the perspective of property and contract rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":162065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Law & Economics: Private Law (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Law & Economics: Private Law (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.242514\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Law & Economics: Private Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.242514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

实际上,每一篇关于收购和合并的经济、法律或道德方面的文章都是从发起者的角度来讨论这个话题的,用一个贬义的术语来说,就是掠夺者。很少有人写过那些试图阻止收购或合并的人。关于试图阻止收购或合并所涉及的道德问题的文章就更少了。本文试图填补这一文献空白。作者从功利主义和权利两方面考察了阻止同意的成年人进行收购或合并的企图,并得出结论认为,无论是从功利主义的伦理角度还是从财产和合同权利的角度来看,试图阻止收购和合并领域的双方同意活动的个人都从事不道德的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Overlooked Ethical Questions in Acquisitions and Mergers: A Look at Some Legal, Economic and Philosophical Issues
Practically every article that has ever been written about the economic, legal or ethical aspects of acquisitions and mergers has proceeded to discuss the topic from the viewpoint of the initiators, the predators, to use a pejorative term. Very little has been written about the individuals who try to prevent an acquisition or a merger. Still less has been written about the ethical issues involved in attempting to prevent an acquisition or merger. This article attempts to fill that gap in the literature. The author looks at attempts to prevent consenting adults from entering into an acquisition or merger from both the utilitarian and rights perspectives and concludes that individuals who attempt to prevent consensual activity in the area of acquisitions and mergers engage in unethical conduct, whether viewed from the utilitarian ethical perspective or the perspective of property and contract rights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信