预防性静脉注射地塞米松与右美托咪定治疗下段剖宫产术中脊柱后寒战:一项前瞻性随机双盲研究

P. Shah, K. Ummu Habeeba
{"title":"预防性静脉注射地塞米松与右美托咪定治疗下段剖宫产术中脊柱后寒战:一项前瞻性随机双盲研究","authors":"P. Shah, K. Ummu Habeeba","doi":"10.4103/jica.jica_6_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Shivering is one of the most common encountered little big problems with spinal anesthesia. There are only few published studies comparing intravenous (iv) dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine for the prevention of postspinal shivering (PSS). Aim: The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of iv dexamethasone and iv dexmedetomidine in the prevention of PSS during lower segment cesarean section. Methods: Total 160 parturients were randomly allocated into 2 groups by a Sequentially Numbered Opaque Sealed Envelope technique, namely Group Dx and Dm (n = 80). Group Dx received iv dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg whereas Group Dm received iv dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg. Incidence of shivering and shivering score were the primary outcomes and the secondary outcomes were sedation score, level of blockade, duration of surgery, axillary temperature, adverse effects, Apgar score, and hemodynamic parameters. Results: Incidence of shivering was significantly low in dexmedetomidine compared to dexamethasone (13.75% vs. 31.25%; P = 0.00468). Group Dx also had comparatively higher shivering score. Overall incidence of sedation was higher in Group Dm compared to Group Dx (15% vs. 3.75%; P = 0.0022). Five parturients in Group Dm (6.25%) had bradycardia compared to none in Group Dx. Respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and Apgar score were statistically comparable between the 2 Groups. Conclusion: iv dexmedetomidine is more effective in preventing PSS compared to dexamethasone. Additional sedation with dexmedetomidine aids more comfort to the parturients.","PeriodicalId":361779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian College of Anaesthesiologists","volume":"2017 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prophylactic intravenous dexamethasone versus dexmedetomidine for postspinal shivering during lower segment cesarean section: A prospective randomized, double-blind study\",\"authors\":\"P. Shah, K. Ummu Habeeba\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jica.jica_6_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Shivering is one of the most common encountered little big problems with spinal anesthesia. There are only few published studies comparing intravenous (iv) dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine for the prevention of postspinal shivering (PSS). Aim: The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of iv dexamethasone and iv dexmedetomidine in the prevention of PSS during lower segment cesarean section. Methods: Total 160 parturients were randomly allocated into 2 groups by a Sequentially Numbered Opaque Sealed Envelope technique, namely Group Dx and Dm (n = 80). Group Dx received iv dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg whereas Group Dm received iv dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg. Incidence of shivering and shivering score were the primary outcomes and the secondary outcomes were sedation score, level of blockade, duration of surgery, axillary temperature, adverse effects, Apgar score, and hemodynamic parameters. Results: Incidence of shivering was significantly low in dexmedetomidine compared to dexamethasone (13.75% vs. 31.25%; P = 0.00468). Group Dx also had comparatively higher shivering score. Overall incidence of sedation was higher in Group Dm compared to Group Dx (15% vs. 3.75%; P = 0.0022). Five parturients in Group Dm (6.25%) had bradycardia compared to none in Group Dx. Respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and Apgar score were statistically comparable between the 2 Groups. Conclusion: iv dexmedetomidine is more effective in preventing PSS compared to dexamethasone. Additional sedation with dexmedetomidine aids more comfort to the parturients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":361779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Indian College of Anaesthesiologists\",\"volume\":\"2017 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Indian College of Anaesthesiologists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jica.jica_6_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian College of Anaesthesiologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jica.jica_6_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

简介:颤抖是脊髓麻醉中最常见的小问题之一。只有少数发表的研究比较静脉注射地塞米松和右美托咪定预防脊髓后寒战(PSS)。目的:比较静脉地塞米松和静脉右美托咪定预防下段剖宫产术中PSS的有效性和安全性。方法:采用顺序编号不透明封膜技术将160例产妇随机分为Dx组和Dm组(n = 80)。Dx组静脉注射地塞米松0.1 mg/kg, Dm组静脉注射右美托咪定1 μg/kg。寒战发生率和寒战评分为主要结局,镇静评分、阻断水平、手术时间、腋窝温度、不良反应、Apgar评分和血流动力学参数为次要结局。结果:与地塞米松相比,右美托咪定的寒战发生率明显较低(13.75% vs. 31.25%;P = 0.00468)。Dx组的寒战得分也相对较高。Dm组镇静的总发生率高于Dx组(15% vs. 3.75%;P = 0.0022)。Dm组有5例(6.25%)出现心动过缓,而Dx组无一例。两组患者呼吸频率、血氧饱和度、Apgar评分差异有统计学意义。结论:与地塞米松相比,静脉注射右美托咪定预防PSS更有效。右美托咪定的额外镇静有助于提高产妇的舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prophylactic intravenous dexamethasone versus dexmedetomidine for postspinal shivering during lower segment cesarean section: A prospective randomized, double-blind study
Introduction: Shivering is one of the most common encountered little big problems with spinal anesthesia. There are only few published studies comparing intravenous (iv) dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine for the prevention of postspinal shivering (PSS). Aim: The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of iv dexamethasone and iv dexmedetomidine in the prevention of PSS during lower segment cesarean section. Methods: Total 160 parturients were randomly allocated into 2 groups by a Sequentially Numbered Opaque Sealed Envelope technique, namely Group Dx and Dm (n = 80). Group Dx received iv dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg whereas Group Dm received iv dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg. Incidence of shivering and shivering score were the primary outcomes and the secondary outcomes were sedation score, level of blockade, duration of surgery, axillary temperature, adverse effects, Apgar score, and hemodynamic parameters. Results: Incidence of shivering was significantly low in dexmedetomidine compared to dexamethasone (13.75% vs. 31.25%; P = 0.00468). Group Dx also had comparatively higher shivering score. Overall incidence of sedation was higher in Group Dm compared to Group Dx (15% vs. 3.75%; P = 0.0022). Five parturients in Group Dm (6.25%) had bradycardia compared to none in Group Dx. Respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and Apgar score were statistically comparable between the 2 Groups. Conclusion: iv dexmedetomidine is more effective in preventing PSS compared to dexamethasone. Additional sedation with dexmedetomidine aids more comfort to the parturients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信