海因里希·申克、沃尔特·达姆斯和南方音乐

John Koslovsky
{"title":"海因里希·申克、沃尔特·达姆斯和南方音乐","authors":"John Koslovsky","doi":"10.1525/JM.2017.34.3.391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years scholars have made great strides in contextualizing the theories of Heinrich Schenker (1868−1935) within the politics and culture of the interwar period. Many of Schenker’s closest pupils and disciples have now also come under investigation. Few present as bewildering a story as Walter Dahms (1887−1973), a music critic and one of Schenker’s fiercest advocates in the German press. Though they met on just one occasion, Dahms and Schenker corresponded extensively over a period of eighteen years (1913−31), revealing a mutual concern for the social and political climate of interwar Germany. In some cases their correspondence served as a springboard for many of the extra-musical ideas Schenker published in his analytical pamphlets of the 1920s, Der Tonwille and Das Meisterwerk in der Musik . In other cases it demonstrated Dahms’s and Schenker’s bitter disagreements about the Great War and its main perpetrators. Along with an array of articles he wrote on Schenker, Dahms published two books that brought Friedrich Nietzsche’s notion of the “Music of the South” into contact with Schenker’s developing theories of musical structure. Dahms further proposed a concept of “vocality” that he saw as the key to restoring the notion of musical genius in Western music. Schenker’s analysis of Mendelssohn’s Venetianisches Gondellied in F-sharp minor, op. 30, no. 6, published in issue 10 of Der Tonwille , unearths Schenker’s own take on the South and on Dahms’s vocal principle. In the end, this case study exemplifies the intermingling of aesthetic, performative, and analytical concerns within Schenker’s work at this time, and it exposes the many ideological tensions between Schenker’s and Dahms’s outlooks on music, culture, and politics.","PeriodicalId":413730,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Musicology","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heinrich Schenker, Walter Dahms, and the Music of the South\",\"authors\":\"John Koslovsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/JM.2017.34.3.391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years scholars have made great strides in contextualizing the theories of Heinrich Schenker (1868−1935) within the politics and culture of the interwar period. Many of Schenker’s closest pupils and disciples have now also come under investigation. Few present as bewildering a story as Walter Dahms (1887−1973), a music critic and one of Schenker’s fiercest advocates in the German press. Though they met on just one occasion, Dahms and Schenker corresponded extensively over a period of eighteen years (1913−31), revealing a mutual concern for the social and political climate of interwar Germany. In some cases their correspondence served as a springboard for many of the extra-musical ideas Schenker published in his analytical pamphlets of the 1920s, Der Tonwille and Das Meisterwerk in der Musik . In other cases it demonstrated Dahms’s and Schenker’s bitter disagreements about the Great War and its main perpetrators. Along with an array of articles he wrote on Schenker, Dahms published two books that brought Friedrich Nietzsche’s notion of the “Music of the South” into contact with Schenker’s developing theories of musical structure. Dahms further proposed a concept of “vocality” that he saw as the key to restoring the notion of musical genius in Western music. Schenker’s analysis of Mendelssohn’s Venetianisches Gondellied in F-sharp minor, op. 30, no. 6, published in issue 10 of Der Tonwille , unearths Schenker’s own take on the South and on Dahms’s vocal principle. In the end, this case study exemplifies the intermingling of aesthetic, performative, and analytical concerns within Schenker’s work at this time, and it exposes the many ideological tensions between Schenker’s and Dahms’s outlooks on music, culture, and politics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Musicology\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Musicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/JM.2017.34.3.391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Musicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/JM.2017.34.3.391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,学者们在将海因里希·申克(1868 - 1935)的理论置于两次世界大战之间的政治和文化背景中进行研究方面取得了很大进展。许多申克最亲近的学生和门徒现在也在接受调查。沃尔特·达姆斯(Walter Dahms, 1887 - 1973)是一位音乐评论家,也是德国媒体上申克最坚定的拥护者之一,很少有人能像他那样讲述一个令人困惑的故事。虽然他们只见过一次面,但达姆斯和申克在长达18年的时间里(1913 - 31)进行了广泛的通信,揭示了他们对两次世界大战之间德国社会和政治气候的共同关注。在某些情况下,他们的通信成为了Schenker在20世纪20年代出版的分析小册子《音乐中的大师》(Der Tonwille)和《音乐中的大师》(Das Meisterwerk In Der Musik)中许多音乐之外的想法的跳板。在其他情况下,它显示了达姆斯和申克对第一次世界大战及其主要肇事者的激烈分歧。随着他写了一系列关于申克的文章,达姆斯出版了两本书,将弗里德里希·尼采的“南方音乐”概念与申克正在发展的音乐结构理论联系起来。达姆斯进一步提出了“声乐”的概念,他认为这是恢复西方音乐天才概念的关键。申克对门德尔松的升f小调《威尼斯人的刚德尔利》的分析,作品30,no。第6期发表在《德尔·汤维尔》(Der Tonwille)第10期的文章,揭示了申克对南方的看法和达姆斯的发声原则。最后,这个案例研究例证了当时申克作品中美学、表演和分析问题的融合,并揭示了申克和达姆斯在音乐、文化和政治方面的许多意识形态上的紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Heinrich Schenker, Walter Dahms, and the Music of the South
In recent years scholars have made great strides in contextualizing the theories of Heinrich Schenker (1868−1935) within the politics and culture of the interwar period. Many of Schenker’s closest pupils and disciples have now also come under investigation. Few present as bewildering a story as Walter Dahms (1887−1973), a music critic and one of Schenker’s fiercest advocates in the German press. Though they met on just one occasion, Dahms and Schenker corresponded extensively over a period of eighteen years (1913−31), revealing a mutual concern for the social and political climate of interwar Germany. In some cases their correspondence served as a springboard for many of the extra-musical ideas Schenker published in his analytical pamphlets of the 1920s, Der Tonwille and Das Meisterwerk in der Musik . In other cases it demonstrated Dahms’s and Schenker’s bitter disagreements about the Great War and its main perpetrators. Along with an array of articles he wrote on Schenker, Dahms published two books that brought Friedrich Nietzsche’s notion of the “Music of the South” into contact with Schenker’s developing theories of musical structure. Dahms further proposed a concept of “vocality” that he saw as the key to restoring the notion of musical genius in Western music. Schenker’s analysis of Mendelssohn’s Venetianisches Gondellied in F-sharp minor, op. 30, no. 6, published in issue 10 of Der Tonwille , unearths Schenker’s own take on the South and on Dahms’s vocal principle. In the end, this case study exemplifies the intermingling of aesthetic, performative, and analytical concerns within Schenker’s work at this time, and it exposes the many ideological tensions between Schenker’s and Dahms’s outlooks on music, culture, and politics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信