利用机器学习辅助听觉处理评价

Hasitha Wimalarathna, Sangamanatha Ankmnal-Veeranna, Minh Duong, Chris Allan, S. Agrawal, P. Allen, J. Samarabandu, H. Ladak
{"title":"利用机器学习辅助听觉处理评价","authors":"Hasitha Wimalarathna, Sangamanatha Ankmnal-Veeranna, Minh Duong, Chris Allan, S. Agrawal, P. Allen, J. Samarabandu, H. Ladak","doi":"10.3389/fauot.2023.1215965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Approximately 0.2–5% of school-age children complain of listening difficulties in the absence of hearing loss. These children are often referred to an audiologist for an auditory processing disorder (APD) assessment. Adequate experience and training is necessary to arrive at an accurate diagnosis due to the heterogeneity of the disorder.The main goal of the study was to determine if machine learning (ML) can be used to analyze data from the APD clinical test battery to accurately categorize children with suspected APD into clinical sub-groups, similar to expert labels.The study retrospectively collected data from 134 children referred for ADP assessment from 2015 to 2021. Labels were provided by expert audiologists for training ML models and derived features from clinical assessments. Two ensemble learning techniques, Random Forest (RF) and Xgboost, were employed, and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) were used to understand the contribution of each derived feature on the model's prediction.The RF model was found to have higher accuracy (90%) than the Xgboost model for this dataset. The study found that features derived from behavioral tests performed better compared to physiological test features, as shown by the SHAP.The study aimed to use machine learning (ML) algorithms to reduce subjectivity in audiological assessments used to diagnose APD in children and identify sub-groups in the clinical population for selective interventions.The study suggests that this work may facilitate the future development of APD clinical diagnosis software.","PeriodicalId":404946,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Audiology and Otology","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using machine learning to assist auditory processing evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Hasitha Wimalarathna, Sangamanatha Ankmnal-Veeranna, Minh Duong, Chris Allan, S. Agrawal, P. Allen, J. Samarabandu, H. Ladak\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fauot.2023.1215965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Approximately 0.2–5% of school-age children complain of listening difficulties in the absence of hearing loss. These children are often referred to an audiologist for an auditory processing disorder (APD) assessment. Adequate experience and training is necessary to arrive at an accurate diagnosis due to the heterogeneity of the disorder.The main goal of the study was to determine if machine learning (ML) can be used to analyze data from the APD clinical test battery to accurately categorize children with suspected APD into clinical sub-groups, similar to expert labels.The study retrospectively collected data from 134 children referred for ADP assessment from 2015 to 2021. Labels were provided by expert audiologists for training ML models and derived features from clinical assessments. Two ensemble learning techniques, Random Forest (RF) and Xgboost, were employed, and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) were used to understand the contribution of each derived feature on the model's prediction.The RF model was found to have higher accuracy (90%) than the Xgboost model for this dataset. The study found that features derived from behavioral tests performed better compared to physiological test features, as shown by the SHAP.The study aimed to use machine learning (ML) algorithms to reduce subjectivity in audiological assessments used to diagnose APD in children and identify sub-groups in the clinical population for selective interventions.The study suggests that this work may facilitate the future development of APD clinical diagnosis software.\",\"PeriodicalId\":404946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Audiology and Otology\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Audiology and Otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fauot.2023.1215965\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Audiology and Otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fauot.2023.1215965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大约0.2% - 5%的学龄儿童在没有听力损失的情况下抱怨听力困难。这些孩子通常被推荐给听力学家进行听觉处理障碍(APD)评估。充分的经验和培训是必要的,以达到准确的诊断,由于异质性的障碍。该研究的主要目标是确定机器学习(ML)是否可以用于分析APD临床测试组的数据,以准确地将疑似APD的儿童分类为临床亚组,类似于专家标签。该研究回顾性收集了2015年至2021年期间接受ADP评估的134名儿童的数据。标签由听力专家提供,用于训练ML模型,并从临床评估中获得特征。采用随机森林(Random Forest, RF)和Xgboost两种集成学习技术,并使用Shapley加性解释(SHAP)来理解每个衍生特征对模型预测的贡献。对于该数据集,发现RF模型比Xgboost模型具有更高的准确性(90%)。研究发现,与生理测试的特征相比,行为测试的特征表现得更好,正如SHAP所显示的那样。该研究旨在使用机器学习(ML)算法来减少用于诊断儿童APD的听力学评估的主观性,并确定临床人群中的亚组以进行选择性干预。本研究为今后APD临床诊断软件的开发提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using machine learning to assist auditory processing evaluation
Approximately 0.2–5% of school-age children complain of listening difficulties in the absence of hearing loss. These children are often referred to an audiologist for an auditory processing disorder (APD) assessment. Adequate experience and training is necessary to arrive at an accurate diagnosis due to the heterogeneity of the disorder.The main goal of the study was to determine if machine learning (ML) can be used to analyze data from the APD clinical test battery to accurately categorize children with suspected APD into clinical sub-groups, similar to expert labels.The study retrospectively collected data from 134 children referred for ADP assessment from 2015 to 2021. Labels were provided by expert audiologists for training ML models and derived features from clinical assessments. Two ensemble learning techniques, Random Forest (RF) and Xgboost, were employed, and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) were used to understand the contribution of each derived feature on the model's prediction.The RF model was found to have higher accuracy (90%) than the Xgboost model for this dataset. The study found that features derived from behavioral tests performed better compared to physiological test features, as shown by the SHAP.The study aimed to use machine learning (ML) algorithms to reduce subjectivity in audiological assessments used to diagnose APD in children and identify sub-groups in the clinical population for selective interventions.The study suggests that this work may facilitate the future development of APD clinical diagnosis software.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信