Henry Förster, Michael Kaufmann, Laura Merker, S. Pupyrev, Chrysanthi N. Raftopoulou
{"title":"二部平面图的线性布局","authors":"Henry Förster, Michael Kaufmann, Laura Merker, S. Pupyrev, Chrysanthi N. Raftopoulou","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2305.16087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A linear layout of a graph $ G $ consists of a linear order $\\prec$ of the vertices and a partition of the edges. A part is called a queue (stack) if no two edges nest (cross), that is, two edges $ (v,w) $ and $ (x,y) $ with $ v \\prec x \\prec y \\prec w $ ($ v \\prec x \\prec w \\prec y $) may not be in the same queue (stack). The best known lower and upper bounds for the number of queues needed for planar graphs are 4 [Alam et al., Algorithmica 2020] and 42 [Bekos et al., Algorithmica 2022], respectively. While queue layouts of special classes of planar graphs have received increased attention following the breakthrough result of [Dujmovi\\'c et al., J. ACM 2020], the meaningful class of bipartite planar graphs has remained elusive so far, explicitly asked for by Bekos et al. In this paper we investigate bipartite planar graphs and give an improved upper bound of 28 by refining existing techniques. In contrast, we show that two queues or one queue together with one stack do not suffice; the latter answers an open question by Pupyrev [GD 2018]. We further investigate subclasses of bipartite planar graphs and give improved upper bounds; in particular we construct 5-queue layouts for 2-degenerate quadrangulations.","PeriodicalId":380945,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Algorithms and Data Structures","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linear Layouts of Bipartite Planar Graphs\",\"authors\":\"Henry Förster, Michael Kaufmann, Laura Merker, S. Pupyrev, Chrysanthi N. Raftopoulou\",\"doi\":\"10.48550/arXiv.2305.16087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A linear layout of a graph $ G $ consists of a linear order $\\\\prec$ of the vertices and a partition of the edges. A part is called a queue (stack) if no two edges nest (cross), that is, two edges $ (v,w) $ and $ (x,y) $ with $ v \\\\prec x \\\\prec y \\\\prec w $ ($ v \\\\prec x \\\\prec w \\\\prec y $) may not be in the same queue (stack). The best known lower and upper bounds for the number of queues needed for planar graphs are 4 [Alam et al., Algorithmica 2020] and 42 [Bekos et al., Algorithmica 2022], respectively. While queue layouts of special classes of planar graphs have received increased attention following the breakthrough result of [Dujmovi\\\\'c et al., J. ACM 2020], the meaningful class of bipartite planar graphs has remained elusive so far, explicitly asked for by Bekos et al. In this paper we investigate bipartite planar graphs and give an improved upper bound of 28 by refining existing techniques. In contrast, we show that two queues or one queue together with one stack do not suffice; the latter answers an open question by Pupyrev [GD 2018]. We further investigate subclasses of bipartite planar graphs and give improved upper bounds; in particular we construct 5-queue layouts for 2-degenerate quadrangulations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":380945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Workshop on Algorithms and Data Structures\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Workshop on Algorithms and Data Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.16087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Algorithms and Data Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.16087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
图$ G $的线性布局由顶点的线性阶$ $ prec$和边的划分组成。如果没有两条边嵌套(交叉),则称为队列(堆栈),即两条边$ (v,w) $和$ (x,y) $与$ v \prec x \prec y \prec w $ ($ v \prec x \prec w \prec y $)可能不在同一个队列(堆栈)中。最著名的平面图所需队列数量的下界和上界分别为4 [Alam等人,Algorithmica 2020]和42 [Bekos等人,Algorithmica 2022]。虽然在[Dujmovi\'c et al., J. ACM 2020]的突破性成果之后,特殊类别的平面图的队列布局受到了越来越多的关注,但有意义的二部平面图类别迄今为止仍然难以捉摸,Bekos等人明确要求。本文研究了二部平面图,并在改进现有技术的基础上给出了一个改进的上界28。相反,我们证明了两个队列或一个队列加一个堆栈是不够的;后者回答了Pupyrev [GD 2018]提出的一个开放性问题。进一步研究了二部平面图的子类,并给出了改进的上界;特别地,我们构造了2-简并四边形的5-队列布局。
A linear layout of a graph $ G $ consists of a linear order $\prec$ of the vertices and a partition of the edges. A part is called a queue (stack) if no two edges nest (cross), that is, two edges $ (v,w) $ and $ (x,y) $ with $ v \prec x \prec y \prec w $ ($ v \prec x \prec w \prec y $) may not be in the same queue (stack). The best known lower and upper bounds for the number of queues needed for planar graphs are 4 [Alam et al., Algorithmica 2020] and 42 [Bekos et al., Algorithmica 2022], respectively. While queue layouts of special classes of planar graphs have received increased attention following the breakthrough result of [Dujmovi\'c et al., J. ACM 2020], the meaningful class of bipartite planar graphs has remained elusive so far, explicitly asked for by Bekos et al. In this paper we investigate bipartite planar graphs and give an improved upper bound of 28 by refining existing techniques. In contrast, we show that two queues or one queue together with one stack do not suffice; the latter answers an open question by Pupyrev [GD 2018]. We further investigate subclasses of bipartite planar graphs and give improved upper bounds; in particular we construct 5-queue layouts for 2-degenerate quadrangulations.