中国的金融纠纷解决:仲裁还是诉讼?

Shahla F. Ali, (Robin) Hui Huang
{"title":"中国的金融纠纷解决:仲裁还是诉讼?","authors":"Shahla F. Ali, (Robin) Hui Huang","doi":"10.1093/arbitration/28.1.77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Determining the appropriate venue for the resolution of financial disputes is a question that has received increased attention in recent years given the growth in financial and banking-related disputes. Within China, the general consensus has been that arbitration is generally to be preferred to in-court litigation due to several factors including practical and court-related considerations. This article critically compares how China’s national arbitration commissions and specialized financial courts are responding to new challenges brought about by an increase in the number of banking related disputes.","PeriodicalId":292366,"journal":{"name":"University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"2014 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial Dispute Resolution in China: Arbitration or Court Litigation?\",\"authors\":\"Shahla F. Ali, (Robin) Hui Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/arbitration/28.1.77\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Determining the appropriate venue for the resolution of financial disputes is a question that has received increased attention in recent years given the growth in financial and banking-related disputes. Within China, the general consensus has been that arbitration is generally to be preferred to in-court litigation due to several factors including practical and court-related considerations. This article critically compares how China’s national arbitration commissions and specialized financial courts are responding to new challenges brought about by an increase in the number of banking related disputes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":292366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"2014 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/28.1.77\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/28.1.77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

鉴于金融和银行相关纠纷的增长,确定解决金融纠纷的适当地点是近年来受到越来越多关注的问题。在中国,普遍的共识是,由于实际和法院相关的考虑等几个因素,仲裁通常比庭内诉讼更受青睐。本文批判性地比较了中国的国家仲裁委员会和专业金融法院是如何应对银行相关纠纷数量增加所带来的新挑战的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Financial Dispute Resolution in China: Arbitration or Court Litigation?
Determining the appropriate venue for the resolution of financial disputes is a question that has received increased attention in recent years given the growth in financial and banking-related disputes. Within China, the general consensus has been that arbitration is generally to be preferred to in-court litigation due to several factors including practical and court-related considerations. This article critically compares how China’s national arbitration commissions and specialized financial courts are responding to new challenges brought about by an increase in the number of banking related disputes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信