安乐死应该在英格兰和威尔士合法化吗?解读约翰·斯图亚特·密尔的伤害原则

Lauren Wharton
{"title":"安乐死应该在英格兰和威尔士合法化吗?解读约翰·斯图亚特·密尔的伤害原则","authors":"Lauren Wharton","doi":"10.19164/SJPPAR.V1I1.795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In September 2017, Margaret Somerville wrote a powerful article in The Guardian arguing that euthanasia offered individuals death rather than loving care. She cautioned against normalising assisted dying and the unavoidable “slippery slope”. This article will explore the arguments put forward in Somerville’s piece, against John Stuart Mill’s harm principle. The author will argue that the harm principle is preferred for the following reasons; an individual’s autonomy is central to a liberal society, individuals should also be free to make their own choices about their life, and the law should be equal to all. The article will look at criticisms and support for the harm principle and will finally reach a conclusion on whether or not assisted suicide and euthanasia should be legalised.","PeriodicalId":191675,"journal":{"name":"The Student Journal of Professional Practice and Academic Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should Euthanasia be legalised in England and Wales? Interpreting John Stuart Mill’s Harm Principle\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Wharton\",\"doi\":\"10.19164/SJPPAR.V1I1.795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In September 2017, Margaret Somerville wrote a powerful article in The Guardian arguing that euthanasia offered individuals death rather than loving care. She cautioned against normalising assisted dying and the unavoidable “slippery slope”. This article will explore the arguments put forward in Somerville’s piece, against John Stuart Mill’s harm principle. The author will argue that the harm principle is preferred for the following reasons; an individual’s autonomy is central to a liberal society, individuals should also be free to make their own choices about their life, and the law should be equal to all. The article will look at criticisms and support for the harm principle and will finally reach a conclusion on whether or not assisted suicide and euthanasia should be legalised.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Student Journal of Professional Practice and Academic Research\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Student Journal of Professional Practice and Academic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19164/SJPPAR.V1I1.795\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Student Journal of Professional Practice and Academic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19164/SJPPAR.V1I1.795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2017年9月,玛格丽特·萨默维尔在《卫报》上发表了一篇强有力的文章,认为安乐死给个人带来的是死亡,而不是关爱。她告诫人们不要将协助死亡正常化,避免不可避免的“滑坡效应”。本文将探讨萨默维尔的文章中提出的反对约翰·斯图亚特·密尔的伤害原则的论点。笔者认为,损害原则是可取的,理由如下:个人的自主权是自由社会的核心,个人也应该自由地对自己的生活做出选择,法律应该对所有人平等。这篇文章将着眼于对伤害原则的批评和支持,并最终得出一个结论,即协助自杀和安乐死是否应该合法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Should Euthanasia be legalised in England and Wales? Interpreting John Stuart Mill’s Harm Principle
In September 2017, Margaret Somerville wrote a powerful article in The Guardian arguing that euthanasia offered individuals death rather than loving care. She cautioned against normalising assisted dying and the unavoidable “slippery slope”. This article will explore the arguments put forward in Somerville’s piece, against John Stuart Mill’s harm principle. The author will argue that the harm principle is preferred for the following reasons; an individual’s autonomy is central to a liberal society, individuals should also be free to make their own choices about their life, and the law should be equal to all. The article will look at criticisms and support for the harm principle and will finally reach a conclusion on whether or not assisted suicide and euthanasia should be legalised.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信