{"title":"斯洛伐克工作场所信息隐私的可信度和信任度。直觉的运用","authors":"Frithiof Svenson, E. Mikušková, M. Launer","doi":"10.1108/jices-02-2022-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nEmployees may feel overwhelmed with information privacy choices and have difficulties understanding what they are committing to in the digital workplace. This paper aims to analyze the role of different thinking styles for effort reduction, such as the use of intuition, when employees make decisions about the credibility and trustworthiness of workplace information privacy issues in Slovakia. While the General Data Protection Regulation sets precise requirements for valid consent, organizations are classified as data controllers and are subject to credibility judgments by their employees.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nData was collected from 230 employees in Slovakia using a survey questionnaire. Quantitative analysis using SPSS was conducted to describe employees thinking preferences when judging the credibility of information privacy in their organizations.\n\n\nFindings\nThe survey participants revealed their perceived credibility and trust in personal data protection and thinking preferences. Unconscious thinking is the type of effort reduction often reported by participants, who perceive high credibility and trust in personal data protection. This study can help managers and data controllers in small- and medium-sized enterprises in reflecting about the way in which people use different thinking processes for decision-making about information privacy in their organizations.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study set out to explore how decision-making processes at the workplace relate to credibility of data practices. Focusing on the use of different types of intuition, the authors explored whether the preference for a specific decision-making style can explain the perceived credibility of data practices. The part of the workforce in the sample did not have a strict predisposition to use either intuitive or rational thinking.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe contribution provides scholars with an overview of the field of intuition, a field that is likely to grow given the challenges of digitalization for organizations, such as shitstorms, cyberattacks and whistleblowing.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe most well-known concepts from intuition research, e.g. the dual process theory, and practice are tested simultaneously, therewith contributing to the applied literature on domain-specific preferences for intuition and deliberation in decision-making.\n","PeriodicalId":156416,"journal":{"name":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","volume":"163 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Credibility and trust of information privacy at the workplace in Slovakia. The use of intuition\",\"authors\":\"Frithiof Svenson, E. Mikušková, M. Launer\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jices-02-2022-0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nEmployees may feel overwhelmed with information privacy choices and have difficulties understanding what they are committing to in the digital workplace. This paper aims to analyze the role of different thinking styles for effort reduction, such as the use of intuition, when employees make decisions about the credibility and trustworthiness of workplace information privacy issues in Slovakia. While the General Data Protection Regulation sets precise requirements for valid consent, organizations are classified as data controllers and are subject to credibility judgments by their employees.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nData was collected from 230 employees in Slovakia using a survey questionnaire. Quantitative analysis using SPSS was conducted to describe employees thinking preferences when judging the credibility of information privacy in their organizations.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe survey participants revealed their perceived credibility and trust in personal data protection and thinking preferences. Unconscious thinking is the type of effort reduction often reported by participants, who perceive high credibility and trust in personal data protection. This study can help managers and data controllers in small- and medium-sized enterprises in reflecting about the way in which people use different thinking processes for decision-making about information privacy in their organizations.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThis study set out to explore how decision-making processes at the workplace relate to credibility of data practices. Focusing on the use of different types of intuition, the authors explored whether the preference for a specific decision-making style can explain the perceived credibility of data practices. The part of the workforce in the sample did not have a strict predisposition to use either intuitive or rational thinking.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe contribution provides scholars with an overview of the field of intuition, a field that is likely to grow given the challenges of digitalization for organizations, such as shitstorms, cyberattacks and whistleblowing.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe most well-known concepts from intuition research, e.g. the dual process theory, and practice are tested simultaneously, therewith contributing to the applied literature on domain-specific preferences for intuition and deliberation in decision-making.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":156416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.\",\"volume\":\"163 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-02-2022-0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-02-2022-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
员工可能会对信息隐私的选择感到不知所措,并且很难理解他们在数字化工作场所所做的事情。本文旨在分析不同的思维方式的作用,以减少努力,如使用直觉,当员工作出决策的可信性和可信赖的工作场所信息隐私问题在斯洛伐克。虽然《通用数据保护条例》(General Data Protection Regulation)对有效同意设定了精确的要求,但组织被归类为数据控制者,并受制于其员工的可信度判断。设计/方法/方法使用调查问卷从斯洛伐克的230名员工中收集数据。使用SPSS进行定量分析,以描述员工在判断其组织中信息隐私可信度时的思维偏好。调查结果:调查参与者透露了他们对个人数据保护的可信度和信任度,以及他们的思维偏好。无意识思维是参与者经常报告的努力减少的类型,他们认为个人数据保护具有很高的可信度和信任度。本研究可以帮助中小企业的管理者和数据控制者反思人们在组织中使用不同思维过程进行信息隐私决策的方式。研究局限性/意义本研究旨在探讨工作场所的决策过程与数据实践的可信度之间的关系。关注不同类型直觉的使用,作者探讨了对特定决策风格的偏好是否可以解释数据实践的感知可信度。样本中的部分劳动力并没有严格倾向于使用直觉或理性思维。该贡献为学者们提供了直觉领域的概述,考虑到数字化对组织的挑战,例如风暴、网络攻击和告密,这个领域可能会发展。独创性/价值直觉研究中最著名的概念,如双过程理论,与实践同时进行测试,从而有助于在决策中对直觉和深思熟虑的特定领域偏好的应用文献。
Credibility and trust of information privacy at the workplace in Slovakia. The use of intuition
Purpose
Employees may feel overwhelmed with information privacy choices and have difficulties understanding what they are committing to in the digital workplace. This paper aims to analyze the role of different thinking styles for effort reduction, such as the use of intuition, when employees make decisions about the credibility and trustworthiness of workplace information privacy issues in Slovakia. While the General Data Protection Regulation sets precise requirements for valid consent, organizations are classified as data controllers and are subject to credibility judgments by their employees.
Design/methodology/approach
Data was collected from 230 employees in Slovakia using a survey questionnaire. Quantitative analysis using SPSS was conducted to describe employees thinking preferences when judging the credibility of information privacy in their organizations.
Findings
The survey participants revealed their perceived credibility and trust in personal data protection and thinking preferences. Unconscious thinking is the type of effort reduction often reported by participants, who perceive high credibility and trust in personal data protection. This study can help managers and data controllers in small- and medium-sized enterprises in reflecting about the way in which people use different thinking processes for decision-making about information privacy in their organizations.
Research limitations/implications
This study set out to explore how decision-making processes at the workplace relate to credibility of data practices. Focusing on the use of different types of intuition, the authors explored whether the preference for a specific decision-making style can explain the perceived credibility of data practices. The part of the workforce in the sample did not have a strict predisposition to use either intuitive or rational thinking.
Practical implications
The contribution provides scholars with an overview of the field of intuition, a field that is likely to grow given the challenges of digitalization for organizations, such as shitstorms, cyberattacks and whistleblowing.
Originality/value
The most well-known concepts from intuition research, e.g. the dual process theory, and practice are tested simultaneously, therewith contributing to the applied literature on domain-specific preferences for intuition and deliberation in decision-making.