无线传感器网络中不同纠错码的物理层安全性性能分析

Mohammed Ahmed Magzoub Albashier, Azlan Abdaziz, Hadhrami Abd. Ghani
{"title":"无线传感器网络中不同纠错码的物理层安全性性能分析","authors":"Mohammed Ahmed Magzoub Albashier, Azlan Abdaziz, Hadhrami Abd. Ghani","doi":"10.1109/WPMC.2017.8301806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays wireless sensor networks are becoming very important part in our daily life as it is adopted in various applications. However wireless sensor networks are vulnerable to many attacks such as denial of service. Therefore, the number of security threats has increased dramatically due to the increase in the number of applications adopted wireless sensor networks. Physical layer security is considered to be more robust than upper layers security. In this paper we address the problem of evaluating popular techniques (Reed Solomon techniques and scrambled error correcting) in term of security gap which is the difference between the signal to noise ratio of the legitimate receiver and the signal to noise ratio of the eavesdropper. Our work compare scrambled t-error correcting codes with Reed Solomon using bit error rate and security gap. Experiments and analysis showed that Reed Solomon has almost the same security gap as scrambled error correcting codes which requires more computational power than Reed Solomon.","PeriodicalId":239243,"journal":{"name":"2017 20th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC)","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance analysis of physical layer security over different error correcting codes in wireless sensor networks\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Ahmed Magzoub Albashier, Azlan Abdaziz, Hadhrami Abd. Ghani\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WPMC.2017.8301806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nowadays wireless sensor networks are becoming very important part in our daily life as it is adopted in various applications. However wireless sensor networks are vulnerable to many attacks such as denial of service. Therefore, the number of security threats has increased dramatically due to the increase in the number of applications adopted wireless sensor networks. Physical layer security is considered to be more robust than upper layers security. In this paper we address the problem of evaluating popular techniques (Reed Solomon techniques and scrambled error correcting) in term of security gap which is the difference between the signal to noise ratio of the legitimate receiver and the signal to noise ratio of the eavesdropper. Our work compare scrambled t-error correcting codes with Reed Solomon using bit error rate and security gap. Experiments and analysis showed that Reed Solomon has almost the same security gap as scrambled error correcting codes which requires more computational power than Reed Solomon.\",\"PeriodicalId\":239243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 20th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC)\",\"volume\":\"119 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 20th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WPMC.2017.8301806\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 20th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WPMC.2017.8301806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

目前,无线传感器网络已成为我们日常生活中非常重要的组成部分,被广泛应用于各种领域。然而,无线传感器网络容易受到许多攻击,如拒绝服务。因此,由于采用无线传感器网络的应用数量的增加,安全威胁的数量急剧增加。物理层安全性被认为比上层安全性更健壮。本文从安全缺口(合法接收方的信噪比与窃听方的信噪比之差)的角度来评价常用的技术(里德-所罗门技术和加扰纠错技术)。本文利用误码率和安全缺口对加扰t-错误纠错码与Reed Solomon纠错码进行了比较。实验和分析表明,Reed Solomon的安全漏洞几乎与打乱纠错码相同,打乱纠错码需要比Reed Solomon更多的计算能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance analysis of physical layer security over different error correcting codes in wireless sensor networks
Nowadays wireless sensor networks are becoming very important part in our daily life as it is adopted in various applications. However wireless sensor networks are vulnerable to many attacks such as denial of service. Therefore, the number of security threats has increased dramatically due to the increase in the number of applications adopted wireless sensor networks. Physical layer security is considered to be more robust than upper layers security. In this paper we address the problem of evaluating popular techniques (Reed Solomon techniques and scrambled error correcting) in term of security gap which is the difference between the signal to noise ratio of the legitimate receiver and the signal to noise ratio of the eavesdropper. Our work compare scrambled t-error correcting codes with Reed Solomon using bit error rate and security gap. Experiments and analysis showed that Reed Solomon has almost the same security gap as scrambled error correcting codes which requires more computational power than Reed Solomon.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信