改进电休克治疗前患者的医学评估:跨两个部位的审计

Hannah R Driver
{"title":"改进电休克治疗前患者的医学评估:跨两个部位的审计","authors":"Hannah R Driver","doi":"10.1097/YCT.0000000000000304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective It is essential that a medical assessment is completed before commencing electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) to identify possible risk factors that may complicate anesthesia. This audit aimed to improve the physical examination and documented medical history of this assessment usually performed by referring psychiatrists. Methods Patients from 2 sites (A and B) were retrospectively audited against standards from the Scottish ECT Accreditation Network. The timing and systems examined for the physical examination were noted. Site A used an examination sheet; at site B there was no standard way of recording examination. Documented medical histories were compared with comprehensive histories obtained using multiple sources. Discrepancies were noted. Site A was reaudited after amending the examination sheet and adding prompts to use multiple sources when gathering histories. Results There were repeat examinations for ECT in 30 patients (100%) at site A and 6 (23%) of 26 at site B. Physical examinations were incomplete in 47% of patients at A and 100% at B. Oral examination was frequently missed at both sites. Medical histories were accurate in 20% at A and 38% at B. In the reaudit of site A, all 12 patients had a complete repeat examination; histories were accurate in 8 (67%), with multiple sources used in 11 (92%). Conclusions Incomplete or inaccurate assessments put patients at risk. Oral examinations should be part of initial medical assessments. This audit shows the benefits of using a physical examination sheet to ensure a repeat complete examination. Using multiple sources to gather medical histories is encouraged.","PeriodicalId":287576,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of ECT","volume":"216 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the Medical Assessment of Patients Before Electroconvulsive Therapy: An Audit Across Two Sites\",\"authors\":\"Hannah R Driver\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/YCT.0000000000000304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective It is essential that a medical assessment is completed before commencing electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) to identify possible risk factors that may complicate anesthesia. This audit aimed to improve the physical examination and documented medical history of this assessment usually performed by referring psychiatrists. Methods Patients from 2 sites (A and B) were retrospectively audited against standards from the Scottish ECT Accreditation Network. The timing and systems examined for the physical examination were noted. Site A used an examination sheet; at site B there was no standard way of recording examination. Documented medical histories were compared with comprehensive histories obtained using multiple sources. Discrepancies were noted. Site A was reaudited after amending the examination sheet and adding prompts to use multiple sources when gathering histories. Results There were repeat examinations for ECT in 30 patients (100%) at site A and 6 (23%) of 26 at site B. Physical examinations were incomplete in 47% of patients at A and 100% at B. Oral examination was frequently missed at both sites. Medical histories were accurate in 20% at A and 38% at B. In the reaudit of site A, all 12 patients had a complete repeat examination; histories were accurate in 8 (67%), with multiple sources used in 11 (92%). Conclusions Incomplete or inaccurate assessments put patients at risk. Oral examinations should be part of initial medical assessments. This audit shows the benefits of using a physical examination sheet to ensure a repeat complete examination. Using multiple sources to gather medical histories is encouraged.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of ECT\",\"volume\":\"216 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of ECT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of ECT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的在开始电休克治疗(ECT)之前,必须完成医学评估,以确定可能使麻醉复杂化的危险因素。该审核旨在改善通常由转诊精神科医生进行的体格检查和记录的病史评估。方法根据苏格兰电痉挛疗法认证网络的标准对A和B两个地点的患者进行回顾性审核。记录了体格检查的时间和系统。站点A使用了一张检查单;B点没有标准的记录检查方法。将记录的病史与多种来源获得的综合病史进行比较。注意到不符之处。在修改了审核表并增加了收集历史记录时使用多种来源的提示后,对A站点进行了重新审核。结果A部位30例(100%)和b部位26例中6例(23%)重复行ECT检查。A部位47%和b部位100%复查不全。A点和b点的病史准确率分别为20%和38%。在A点复查时,所有12例患者都进行了完整的复查;8例(67%)的历史记录是准确的,11例(92%)使用了多个来源。结论:不完整或不准确的评估使患者处于危险之中。口腔检查应是初步医疗评估的一部分。这次审核显示了使用体格检查表确保重复完整检查的好处。鼓励使用多种来源收集病史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving the Medical Assessment of Patients Before Electroconvulsive Therapy: An Audit Across Two Sites
Objective It is essential that a medical assessment is completed before commencing electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) to identify possible risk factors that may complicate anesthesia. This audit aimed to improve the physical examination and documented medical history of this assessment usually performed by referring psychiatrists. Methods Patients from 2 sites (A and B) were retrospectively audited against standards from the Scottish ECT Accreditation Network. The timing and systems examined for the physical examination were noted. Site A used an examination sheet; at site B there was no standard way of recording examination. Documented medical histories were compared with comprehensive histories obtained using multiple sources. Discrepancies were noted. Site A was reaudited after amending the examination sheet and adding prompts to use multiple sources when gathering histories. Results There were repeat examinations for ECT in 30 patients (100%) at site A and 6 (23%) of 26 at site B. Physical examinations were incomplete in 47% of patients at A and 100% at B. Oral examination was frequently missed at both sites. Medical histories were accurate in 20% at A and 38% at B. In the reaudit of site A, all 12 patients had a complete repeat examination; histories were accurate in 8 (67%), with multiple sources used in 11 (92%). Conclusions Incomplete or inaccurate assessments put patients at risk. Oral examinations should be part of initial medical assessments. This audit shows the benefits of using a physical examination sheet to ensure a repeat complete examination. Using multiple sources to gather medical histories is encouraged.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信