{"title":"改进电休克治疗前患者的医学评估:跨两个部位的审计","authors":"Hannah R Driver","doi":"10.1097/YCT.0000000000000304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective It is essential that a medical assessment is completed before commencing electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) to identify possible risk factors that may complicate anesthesia. This audit aimed to improve the physical examination and documented medical history of this assessment usually performed by referring psychiatrists. Methods Patients from 2 sites (A and B) were retrospectively audited against standards from the Scottish ECT Accreditation Network. The timing and systems examined for the physical examination were noted. Site A used an examination sheet; at site B there was no standard way of recording examination. Documented medical histories were compared with comprehensive histories obtained using multiple sources. Discrepancies were noted. Site A was reaudited after amending the examination sheet and adding prompts to use multiple sources when gathering histories. Results There were repeat examinations for ECT in 30 patients (100%) at site A and 6 (23%) of 26 at site B. Physical examinations were incomplete in 47% of patients at A and 100% at B. Oral examination was frequently missed at both sites. Medical histories were accurate in 20% at A and 38% at B. In the reaudit of site A, all 12 patients had a complete repeat examination; histories were accurate in 8 (67%), with multiple sources used in 11 (92%). Conclusions Incomplete or inaccurate assessments put patients at risk. Oral examinations should be part of initial medical assessments. This audit shows the benefits of using a physical examination sheet to ensure a repeat complete examination. Using multiple sources to gather medical histories is encouraged.","PeriodicalId":287576,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of ECT","volume":"216 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the Medical Assessment of Patients Before Electroconvulsive Therapy: An Audit Across Two Sites\",\"authors\":\"Hannah R Driver\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/YCT.0000000000000304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective It is essential that a medical assessment is completed before commencing electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) to identify possible risk factors that may complicate anesthesia. This audit aimed to improve the physical examination and documented medical history of this assessment usually performed by referring psychiatrists. Methods Patients from 2 sites (A and B) were retrospectively audited against standards from the Scottish ECT Accreditation Network. The timing and systems examined for the physical examination were noted. Site A used an examination sheet; at site B there was no standard way of recording examination. Documented medical histories were compared with comprehensive histories obtained using multiple sources. Discrepancies were noted. Site A was reaudited after amending the examination sheet and adding prompts to use multiple sources when gathering histories. Results There were repeat examinations for ECT in 30 patients (100%) at site A and 6 (23%) of 26 at site B. Physical examinations were incomplete in 47% of patients at A and 100% at B. Oral examination was frequently missed at both sites. Medical histories were accurate in 20% at A and 38% at B. In the reaudit of site A, all 12 patients had a complete repeat examination; histories were accurate in 8 (67%), with multiple sources used in 11 (92%). Conclusions Incomplete or inaccurate assessments put patients at risk. Oral examinations should be part of initial medical assessments. This audit shows the benefits of using a physical examination sheet to ensure a repeat complete examination. Using multiple sources to gather medical histories is encouraged.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of ECT\",\"volume\":\"216 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of ECT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of ECT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving the Medical Assessment of Patients Before Electroconvulsive Therapy: An Audit Across Two Sites
Objective It is essential that a medical assessment is completed before commencing electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) to identify possible risk factors that may complicate anesthesia. This audit aimed to improve the physical examination and documented medical history of this assessment usually performed by referring psychiatrists. Methods Patients from 2 sites (A and B) were retrospectively audited against standards from the Scottish ECT Accreditation Network. The timing and systems examined for the physical examination were noted. Site A used an examination sheet; at site B there was no standard way of recording examination. Documented medical histories were compared with comprehensive histories obtained using multiple sources. Discrepancies were noted. Site A was reaudited after amending the examination sheet and adding prompts to use multiple sources when gathering histories. Results There were repeat examinations for ECT in 30 patients (100%) at site A and 6 (23%) of 26 at site B. Physical examinations were incomplete in 47% of patients at A and 100% at B. Oral examination was frequently missed at both sites. Medical histories were accurate in 20% at A and 38% at B. In the reaudit of site A, all 12 patients had a complete repeat examination; histories were accurate in 8 (67%), with multiple sources used in 11 (92%). Conclusions Incomplete or inaccurate assessments put patients at risk. Oral examinations should be part of initial medical assessments. This audit shows the benefits of using a physical examination sheet to ensure a repeat complete examination. Using multiple sources to gather medical histories is encouraged.