在线/混合课程质量对美国和马来西亚管理者、教师和学生的意义

E. Smidt, C. Cheong, Emily Dachroeden, Timothy Kochem
{"title":"在线/混合课程质量对美国和马来西亚管理者、教师和学生的意义","authors":"E. Smidt, C. Cheong, Emily Dachroeden, Timothy Kochem","doi":"10.4018/IJDET.2019040103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article compares two studies, investigating administrator, faculty, and student perceptions of quality in online/blended courses conducted in two different contexts, namely (1) two midsize public universities in the United States, and (2) a college in a public university in Malaysia. The research question explored in both studies was: What is the meaning of “quality” in an online/blended course to administrators, faculty, and students? Survey data from the three constituents in both contexts were obtained. Qualitative data analysis revealed the top 7-8 quality features of each context as ranked by number of references. The results revealed similarities and differences in the rankings of the quality features between constituents and between contexts. Similarities suggested that different constituents had different priorities with regards to quality features while differences appeared to be based on where each institution was on their distance education trajectory. These findings should be considered and reflected on in online course design, teaching strategies, and student support.","PeriodicalId":298910,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol.","volume":"280 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Meaning of Quality in Online/Blended Courses to American and Malaysian Administrators, Faculty, and Students\",\"authors\":\"E. Smidt, C. Cheong, Emily Dachroeden, Timothy Kochem\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/IJDET.2019040103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article compares two studies, investigating administrator, faculty, and student perceptions of quality in online/blended courses conducted in two different contexts, namely (1) two midsize public universities in the United States, and (2) a college in a public university in Malaysia. The research question explored in both studies was: What is the meaning of “quality” in an online/blended course to administrators, faculty, and students? Survey data from the three constituents in both contexts were obtained. Qualitative data analysis revealed the top 7-8 quality features of each context as ranked by number of references. The results revealed similarities and differences in the rankings of the quality features between constituents and between contexts. Similarities suggested that different constituents had different priorities with regards to quality features while differences appeared to be based on where each institution was on their distance education trajectory. These findings should be considered and reflected on in online course design, teaching strategies, and student support.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol.\",\"volume\":\"280 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.2019040103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.2019040103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文比较了两项研究,调查了在两种不同背景下进行的在线/混合课程的管理人员、教师和学生对质量的看法,即(1)美国两所中等公立大学,(2)马来西亚一所公立大学的学院。这两项研究探讨的研究问题是:对于管理者、教师和学生来说,在线/混合课程中的“质量”意味着什么?在这两种情况下,从三个组成部分获得了调查数据。定性数据分析显示,根据引用数量,每个上下文的质量特征排名在前7-8位。结果揭示了成分之间和上下文之间质量特征排名的相似性和差异性。相似之处表明,不同的组成部分在质量特征方面有不同的优先级,而差异似乎是基于每个机构在其远程教育轨迹上的位置。这些发现应该在在线课程设计、教学策略和学生支持中得到考虑和反映。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Meaning of Quality in Online/Blended Courses to American and Malaysian Administrators, Faculty, and Students
This article compares two studies, investigating administrator, faculty, and student perceptions of quality in online/blended courses conducted in two different contexts, namely (1) two midsize public universities in the United States, and (2) a college in a public university in Malaysia. The research question explored in both studies was: What is the meaning of “quality” in an online/blended course to administrators, faculty, and students? Survey data from the three constituents in both contexts were obtained. Qualitative data analysis revealed the top 7-8 quality features of each context as ranked by number of references. The results revealed similarities and differences in the rankings of the quality features between constituents and between contexts. Similarities suggested that different constituents had different priorities with regards to quality features while differences appeared to be based on where each institution was on their distance education trajectory. These findings should be considered and reflected on in online course design, teaching strategies, and student support.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信