“香港社会经济权利的判断”,《国际宪制法学杂志》(2018)16(2),第447期

M. Ramsden
{"title":"“香港社会经济权利的判断”,《国际宪制法学杂志》(2018)16(2),第447期","authors":"M. Ramsden","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3656030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers the constitutional nature of socio-economic rights under the Hong Kong Basic Law, principally through the lens of article 39 which mandates the implementation of the International Covenant on Social, Economic and Cultural Rights into domestic law. So far, the Hong Kong courts have been reluctant to give domestic effect to guarantees under the ICESCR. This article assesses the feasibility of making the ICESCR effective through Hong Kong’s administrative law and constitutional law. It argues that there is latent potential to invoke the ICESCR in the construction of legislation using the principle of legality. This interpretative mandate furthers the purposive and generous approach to constitutional interpretation and the guarantee that the ICESCR shall be implemented into Hong Kong law. More broadly, the article contributes to the scholarly literature on socio-economic rights adjudication and constitutional theory on rights interpretation.","PeriodicalId":340197,"journal":{"name":"Comparative & Global Administrative Law eJournal","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Judging Socio-Economic Rights in Hong Kong', (2018) 16(2) International Journal of Constitutional Law 447\",\"authors\":\"M. Ramsden\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3656030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article considers the constitutional nature of socio-economic rights under the Hong Kong Basic Law, principally through the lens of article 39 which mandates the implementation of the International Covenant on Social, Economic and Cultural Rights into domestic law. So far, the Hong Kong courts have been reluctant to give domestic effect to guarantees under the ICESCR. This article assesses the feasibility of making the ICESCR effective through Hong Kong’s administrative law and constitutional law. It argues that there is latent potential to invoke the ICESCR in the construction of legislation using the principle of legality. This interpretative mandate furthers the purposive and generous approach to constitutional interpretation and the guarantee that the ICESCR shall be implemented into Hong Kong law. More broadly, the article contributes to the scholarly literature on socio-economic rights adjudication and constitutional theory on rights interpretation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative & Global Administrative Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative & Global Administrative Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3656030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative & Global Administrative Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3656030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文主要从《香港基本法》第39条的角度,探讨《香港基本法》下社会经济权利的宪制性质,该条规定《社会、经济及文化权利国际公约》必须纳入国内法。到目前为止,香港法院一直不愿让《经济、社会、文化权利国际公约》规定的保证在国内生效。本文通过香港的行政法和宪制法来评估使《经济、社会、文化权利国际公约》生效的可行性。本文认为,在运用合法性原则进行立法建设时,援引《经济、社会、文化权利国际公约》具有潜在的潜力。这一解释授权进一步促进了对宪制解释采取目的明确和宽宏大量的做法,并保证《经济、社会、文化权利国际公约》在香港法律中得以实施。更广泛地说,本文对社会经济权利裁决的学术文献和权利解释的宪法理论做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'Judging Socio-Economic Rights in Hong Kong', (2018) 16(2) International Journal of Constitutional Law 447
This article considers the constitutional nature of socio-economic rights under the Hong Kong Basic Law, principally through the lens of article 39 which mandates the implementation of the International Covenant on Social, Economic and Cultural Rights into domestic law. So far, the Hong Kong courts have been reluctant to give domestic effect to guarantees under the ICESCR. This article assesses the feasibility of making the ICESCR effective through Hong Kong’s administrative law and constitutional law. It argues that there is latent potential to invoke the ICESCR in the construction of legislation using the principle of legality. This interpretative mandate furthers the purposive and generous approach to constitutional interpretation and the guarantee that the ICESCR shall be implemented into Hong Kong law. More broadly, the article contributes to the scholarly literature on socio-economic rights adjudication and constitutional theory on rights interpretation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信