K. Mohammed, O. Gudina, Abubekir Jemal, Anteneh Geremew
{"title":"对陶瓷废骨料与再生沥青路面骨料替代基层材料的适宜性进行了对比试验研究","authors":"K. Mohammed, O. Gudina, Abubekir Jemal, Anteneh Geremew","doi":"10.33736/jcest.4781.2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to assess the suitability of ceramic waste aggregate and recycled asphalt pavement aggregate as an alternative for base course material. An experimental research design method and Non-Probability sampling techniques were used. The comparative analysis of ceramic waste aggregate and recycled asphalt pavement aggregate were blended with crushed stone aggregate at different proportions by weight and their laboratory result was compared with standard specifications. The study results shown that the aggregate crushing value (ACV) for neat Crushed stone aggregate (CSA) and Recycle asphalt pavement (RAP) are 19.20% and 8.20% respectively and the blended CSA with 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% and 50% of RAP were 18.20%, 16.4%, 15.90%, 14.40%, and 13.10% respectively. Similarly, a 24.32% - 12.06% for Los Angeles abrasion (LAA) and 18.50% - 12.60% for aggregate impact value (AIV) were found to the lower and higher value in the range of the test result. The CBR test for a different proportion of RAP (10% - 50%) blended with CSA was also conducted and an economically acceptable result of 104.20% was found at 30% RAP mix at 98% maximum dry density (MDD). Additionally, the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test result for 100%RAP at 98%MDD was 49.10%. On the other hand, the experimental tests were conducted on different proportions of Ceramic West aggregate (CWA) (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%) which satisfy the principal mechanical properties of aggregate materials. The ACV result for neat CWA is 26.70% while the blended CWA- CSA aggregate was tested with 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% of CWA with its complement of CSA as indicated and at 20% CWA replacement of CSA test results were (21.60%, for ACV), (26.31% for LAA), (106.9 for CBR) and (20.60 for AIV). For this investigation an economically acceptable results were achieved by satisfying the Ethiopian road authority (ERA) standard specification limit at 20% CWA and 30% RAP blended with CSA for base course construction material.","PeriodicalId":346729,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil Engineering, Science and Technology","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE COMPARATIVE EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES ON THE SUITABILITY OF CERAMIC WASTE AGGREGATE AND RECYCLED ASPHALT PAVEMENT AGGREGATE AS AN ALTERNATIVE FOR BASE COURSE MATERIAL\",\"authors\":\"K. Mohammed, O. Gudina, Abubekir Jemal, Anteneh Geremew\",\"doi\":\"10.33736/jcest.4781.2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aimed to assess the suitability of ceramic waste aggregate and recycled asphalt pavement aggregate as an alternative for base course material. An experimental research design method and Non-Probability sampling techniques were used. The comparative analysis of ceramic waste aggregate and recycled asphalt pavement aggregate were blended with crushed stone aggregate at different proportions by weight and their laboratory result was compared with standard specifications. The study results shown that the aggregate crushing value (ACV) for neat Crushed stone aggregate (CSA) and Recycle asphalt pavement (RAP) are 19.20% and 8.20% respectively and the blended CSA with 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% and 50% of RAP were 18.20%, 16.4%, 15.90%, 14.40%, and 13.10% respectively. Similarly, a 24.32% - 12.06% for Los Angeles abrasion (LAA) and 18.50% - 12.60% for aggregate impact value (AIV) were found to the lower and higher value in the range of the test result. The CBR test for a different proportion of RAP (10% - 50%) blended with CSA was also conducted and an economically acceptable result of 104.20% was found at 30% RAP mix at 98% maximum dry density (MDD). Additionally, the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test result for 100%RAP at 98%MDD was 49.10%. On the other hand, the experimental tests were conducted on different proportions of Ceramic West aggregate (CWA) (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%) which satisfy the principal mechanical properties of aggregate materials. The ACV result for neat CWA is 26.70% while the blended CWA- CSA aggregate was tested with 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% of CWA with its complement of CSA as indicated and at 20% CWA replacement of CSA test results were (21.60%, for ACV), (26.31% for LAA), (106.9 for CBR) and (20.60 for AIV). For this investigation an economically acceptable results were achieved by satisfying the Ethiopian road authority (ERA) standard specification limit at 20% CWA and 30% RAP blended with CSA for base course construction material.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Civil Engineering, Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Civil Engineering, Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33736/jcest.4781.2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil Engineering, Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33736/jcest.4781.2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本研究旨在评估陶瓷废骨料和再生沥青路面骨料作为基层材料替代品的适用性。采用实验研究设计方法和非概率抽样技术。将陶瓷废骨料与再生沥青路面骨料按不同重量比例与碎石骨料配合比进行对比分析,并将其实验室结果与标准规格进行比较。研究结果表明,纯碎石骨料(CSA)和再生沥青路面(RAP)的集料破碎值(ACV)分别为19.20%和8.20%,RAP含量为10%、20%、30%、40%和50%的混合CSA的破碎值分别为18.20%、16.4%、15.90%、14.40%和13.10%。同样,在试验结果范围内,Los Angeles abrasion (LAA)的取值范围为24.32% ~ 12.06%,aggregate impact value (AIV)的取值范围为18.50% ~ 12.60%。对不同比例的RAP(10% ~ 50%)与CSA混合进行了CBR试验,在30% RAP混合,最大干密度(MDD)为98%时,经济上可接受的结果为104.20%。此外,98%MDD下100%RAP的加州承载比(CBR)测试结果为49.10%。另一方面,对满足骨料主要力学性能要求的陶瓷西骨料(CWA)的不同掺量(10%、20%、30%、40%和50%)进行了试验试验。纯CWA的ACV结果为26.70%,而混合CWA- CSA骨料分别以10%、20%、30%、40%和50%的CWA及其补体CSA进行测试,在20% CWA替代CSA的测试结果为ACV(21.60%)、LAA(26.31%)、CBR(106.9)和AIV(20.60)。对于这项调查,通过满足埃塞俄比亚道路管理局(ERA)标准规范限制,即20%的CWA和30%的RAP与CSA混合用于基层建筑材料,获得了经济上可接受的结果。
THE COMPARATIVE EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES ON THE SUITABILITY OF CERAMIC WASTE AGGREGATE AND RECYCLED ASPHALT PAVEMENT AGGREGATE AS AN ALTERNATIVE FOR BASE COURSE MATERIAL
The study aimed to assess the suitability of ceramic waste aggregate and recycled asphalt pavement aggregate as an alternative for base course material. An experimental research design method and Non-Probability sampling techniques were used. The comparative analysis of ceramic waste aggregate and recycled asphalt pavement aggregate were blended with crushed stone aggregate at different proportions by weight and their laboratory result was compared with standard specifications. The study results shown that the aggregate crushing value (ACV) for neat Crushed stone aggregate (CSA) and Recycle asphalt pavement (RAP) are 19.20% and 8.20% respectively and the blended CSA with 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% and 50% of RAP were 18.20%, 16.4%, 15.90%, 14.40%, and 13.10% respectively. Similarly, a 24.32% - 12.06% for Los Angeles abrasion (LAA) and 18.50% - 12.60% for aggregate impact value (AIV) were found to the lower and higher value in the range of the test result. The CBR test for a different proportion of RAP (10% - 50%) blended with CSA was also conducted and an economically acceptable result of 104.20% was found at 30% RAP mix at 98% maximum dry density (MDD). Additionally, the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test result for 100%RAP at 98%MDD was 49.10%. On the other hand, the experimental tests were conducted on different proportions of Ceramic West aggregate (CWA) (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%) which satisfy the principal mechanical properties of aggregate materials. The ACV result for neat CWA is 26.70% while the blended CWA- CSA aggregate was tested with 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% of CWA with its complement of CSA as indicated and at 20% CWA replacement of CSA test results were (21.60%, for ACV), (26.31% for LAA), (106.9 for CBR) and (20.60 for AIV). For this investigation an economically acceptable results were achieved by satisfying the Ethiopian road authority (ERA) standard specification limit at 20% CWA and 30% RAP blended with CSA for base course construction material.