尝试校准VHF和UHF范围局部放电测量的局限性

G. Behrmann, D. Gross, S. Neuhold
{"title":"尝试校准VHF和UHF范围局部放电测量的局限性","authors":"G. Behrmann, D. Gross, S. Neuhold","doi":"10.1109/CEIDP49254.2020.9437476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is an obvious desire to assign units of charge (pC) to on-site/on-line partial discharge (PD) measurements made using radio-frequency (RF) techniques by employing some means of calibration in a way similar to that defined in IEC 60270. While moving just a few MHz past the IEC 60270 mandated maximum cut-off frequency (1 MHz) may still allow the principle of quasi-integration to hold, and thus allow a valid charge-based calibration, this is strongly dependent on the test object and test circuit. However, at higher (RF/VHF/UHF) frequency regions in which PD diagnostics are often being made today on GIS and HV transformers, physical effects profoundly affect the RF signal generated at the PD source and its path to the receiving sensor, thus directly impacting the received RF signal strength. We explain the problems inherent in attempting charge calibration at these higher frequencies by looking at the fundamental difference in how the measurement methods acquire the PD signal, and we point out the relative unimportance of charge level for certain critical defects.","PeriodicalId":170813,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena (CEIDP)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limitations of Attempting Calibration of Partial Discharge Measurements in VHF and UHF Ranges\",\"authors\":\"G. Behrmann, D. Gross, S. Neuhold\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CEIDP49254.2020.9437476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is an obvious desire to assign units of charge (pC) to on-site/on-line partial discharge (PD) measurements made using radio-frequency (RF) techniques by employing some means of calibration in a way similar to that defined in IEC 60270. While moving just a few MHz past the IEC 60270 mandated maximum cut-off frequency (1 MHz) may still allow the principle of quasi-integration to hold, and thus allow a valid charge-based calibration, this is strongly dependent on the test object and test circuit. However, at higher (RF/VHF/UHF) frequency regions in which PD diagnostics are often being made today on GIS and HV transformers, physical effects profoundly affect the RF signal generated at the PD source and its path to the receiving sensor, thus directly impacting the received RF signal strength. We explain the problems inherent in attempting charge calibration at these higher frequencies by looking at the fundamental difference in how the measurement methods acquire the PD signal, and we point out the relative unimportance of charge level for certain critical defects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena (CEIDP)\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena (CEIDP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEIDP49254.2020.9437476\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena (CEIDP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEIDP49254.2020.9437476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

显然,人们希望通过采用类似于IEC 60270中定义的校准方法,将电荷单位(pC)分配给使用射频(RF)技术进行的现场/在线局部放电(PD)测量。虽然仅移动几MHz超过IEC 60270规定的最大截止频率(1 MHz)可能仍然允许准积分原理保持不变,从而允许有效的基于电荷的校准,但这强烈依赖于测试对象和测试电路。然而,在较高的(RF/VHF/UHF)频率区域,PD诊断通常在GIS和高压变压器上进行,物理效应会深刻影响PD源产生的RF信号及其到接收传感器的路径,从而直接影响接收到的RF信号强度。我们通过观察测量方法如何获得PD信号的根本差异来解释在这些更高频率下尝试电荷校准所固有的问题,并指出电荷水平对某些关键缺陷的相对不重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Limitations of Attempting Calibration of Partial Discharge Measurements in VHF and UHF Ranges
There is an obvious desire to assign units of charge (pC) to on-site/on-line partial discharge (PD) measurements made using radio-frequency (RF) techniques by employing some means of calibration in a way similar to that defined in IEC 60270. While moving just a few MHz past the IEC 60270 mandated maximum cut-off frequency (1 MHz) may still allow the principle of quasi-integration to hold, and thus allow a valid charge-based calibration, this is strongly dependent on the test object and test circuit. However, at higher (RF/VHF/UHF) frequency regions in which PD diagnostics are often being made today on GIS and HV transformers, physical effects profoundly affect the RF signal generated at the PD source and its path to the receiving sensor, thus directly impacting the received RF signal strength. We explain the problems inherent in attempting charge calibration at these higher frequencies by looking at the fundamental difference in how the measurement methods acquire the PD signal, and we point out the relative unimportance of charge level for certain critical defects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信